Quote:
Originally Posted by UploadMonkey
I am pissing myself laughing.  We all know what that evidence look like now. It's just like the 'evidence' that you posted and quickly removed after it turned out to be fake, nothing more than a password protected compressed file containing a useless avi file that nobody will ever be able to watch because the uploader obviously added an unguessable password for that reason, because his upload is useless and fake. But you fell for it. Guess what! These are the other movies he uploaded, all 633.9 MB. Coincidence? Ofcourse not. It's the same useless file uploaded multiple times. |
So what you're saying is that Lumfile.com is full of mislabeled files. Ok, well Lumfile is selling access to download these files. People are being charged money to download these files - so Lumfile is fraudulently billing people for access to non-existent content. However, that's fine in your world - as long as Lumfile can keep billing people for access to content that it does not have any right to distribute or content which is misleadingly labeled then everything is ok.
If you sell copies of Windows on eBay and send blank disks then thats fraud. So what you're saying is that Lumfile is committing fraud.
Quote:
|
So thank you for giving us an insight in how you put together your so-called 'evidence'. You have just proven yourself that your claims against Lumfile are worth shit. Because you didn't even download the file to check the content.
|
If content on Lumfile is labeled as bestiality, rape, child pornography, incest or other illegal content then
this is sufficient for the credit card associations to force their merchant acquirers to terminate their merchant accounts.
The very fact that Lumfile carries files which purport to contain illegal content is enough evidence - there is no need to download anything. The mere suggestion of this content being made available and billed by credit card is enough to seal the fate of the merchant.
Quote:
|
I bet you never do. If you have shelves of this evidence you may as well start all over again because it isn't worth shit.
|
In the past month we have collected tens of thousands of urls in DMCA complaints made by rights holders against Lumfile. None of these DMCA complaints have been complied with.
All of these have been sorted, catalogued and filed along with evidence that the files still exist one , two, three and more weeks after the DMCA was issued.
Quote:
|
And guess what, Mega, Kim Dotcom's file locker you mentioned in your last blog post now has PayPal as a payment processor directly, not just through resellers. This just proves your claims are worthless and your efforts are useless.
|
At the moment Mega is complying with the law, it is removing files that are the subject of DMCA notices, it is not rewarding uploaders of content and is doing nothing for which it should lose it's Paypal account. Paypal placed Mega through the very same stringent compliance checks that it allows any file host to go through in order to become a pre-approved merchant.
Our initial opposition to Mega resellers having Paypal is that they had NOT gone through the necessary pre-approval process thus the required oversight of the operations of Mega had not taken place.
Until Mega stops complying with the law and with Paypal's policies then it's fully entitled to have a Paypal account.