Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse202
The reason they were not banned earlier by hawk was:
So, essentially, if you sent him proof a file host they allow to conduct business on their website, is supporting and promoting the abuse of children, he won't bother checking or deal with it because it may bother his eyes and his bottom line.
I look at this as he (WJ) is supporting it just as much as the guy (lumfile) posting the links.
|
Ah, there's the catch he was pretold what he was linked to was safe. the "abuse" had been removed and you could only see the girls face and the "Lumfile info" even then he could have just check the who.is information against the user info from WJ.
In my eyes this is a cop out. I hate to say this but I reckon he might have been paid.
Just like Capone/Simon. Who I will say it here HAS been proven to be linked to child abuse/underage content. Not just by me but WDF and a hacker named "Z" who put a rat on Simon's desktop and found the content on his drives. A simple check on his Skype name linked him to it. Another thing, Hawk has known me since 2008 and everytime I say something it is fact and not fiction. that's how I ended up as staff on WJ as I didn't even need staff access to know who was who.
Anyway, enough derailing this topic.
AK, Not sure if you're aware you posted a sharpfile.com link above. seems they're coming back and also linked to FileBox.com