Quote:
Originally Posted by bigluv
^^ To above, thanks jackass I missed the one sentence "this has been fixed now". Doesn't really change anything.
If it indeed existed and has been fixed then I expect an announcement from Paxum that their database was compromised and they have no idea who or what info may have been disseminated.
Until that happens as far as I'm concerned the jury is out because no convincing screen shots or documents were posted. The chat with support I don't find convincing necessaryily, I've dealt with enough 3rd world monkeys saying stupid stuff at paxum and at other companies.
If there was enough drama to create a thread why not post the actual evidence and blow the lid off what would be pretty stupid policies over at paxum.
I've observed first hand their shitty coding, but in this case it seems like the OP and paxum support deserve each other. For someone with a rock solid provable case I don't understand why this was so roundabout.
|
It looks like they were trying to not even acknowledge it here. The feeling I got was that they were trying to brush off the people who took their time to bring this to our attention. In fact it seemed they were treating them like shit. That's all too common now. Obviously they aren't a very honest company. Surprise, surprise.
Of course I'm a hater for calling it as it is and what Ruth attempted to do to the people reporting this here is all well and good because she's a bro (or sis!). I should just shut up and go find someone's ass to kiss. It's just more of the same these days. I need to quit coming here for the sake of my blood pressure I think.