Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I'm confused at what you are getting at here... Because a sixteen year old kid died?
Did the US target a sixteen year old kid? Nope. In fact, the only reason the drone strike took place was because they believed the kid was at another location. This was a military strike on an enemy combatant that had collateral damage.
I'm not gonna loose any sleep over this.
|
no. the original story was they attacked #2, and the kid was 'collateral'
it's now out that this kid was killed, specifically, in a separate attack two weeks later
the justification for this was he was the one masterminding the shoe bombings
you know, the bombings that started 2002, when the kid was 6