Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
The process in natural, they just interrupted it (unnatural, but acceptable for our society).
The same as above.
|
Hold on, let me get this... "straight"
A man and a woman interrupting the natural process of procreation by artificial means or having anal sex is "natural", even though it's biologically clear that the anus is NOT a sexual organ because a man and a woman can still "potentially" procreate?
After all, the human anus is not a sexual organ. "Nature" designed it as a way for our bodies to dispose of waste.
Thus if you're using the "natural" angle then any sexual congress which does not involve a penis going into a vajajay is, by your definition, unnatural.
But if it happens between a man and a woman it's okay because they could still "potentially" make a baby.
That my friend, is the very definition of a double standard.
Now if we were turtles and have
cloacas instead of dicks/pussies/asses then I'd have no argument.
But that's not the case. Butt-sex is unnatural per your definition, thus a perversion. Oh God how that makes me laugh.
And yeah, it's funny how Russia is getting all the heat about their position about homosexuality when they make the Saudi Arabia and the Emirates seem like San Francisco by comparison.
But that's what happens when you host the Olympics.