Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Again, you are being silly. If you provide bad results... you have no users and as such, no revenue.
|
Nope. Just need to be better than the other 2 which aren't that good. You don't have to be great. Yahoo and Bing don't set the bar very high so it is easy to be better than them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Furthermore, no search engine can dethrone them, so clearly they are doing a great job no matter what people think.
|
Again who cares if 2 others who suck can't dethrone them. It's cause they suck. Not cause google is so great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Approximately 25% of their search queries each day are new. They aren't going to give a spot to a new article on a new domain with no back links vs an older article on an older domain with tons of back links.
|
Why not? I thought it was supposed to be about 'user experience' ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
And in your analogy, plumber b spends weeks or months making his article rank. Not minutes. And he has to do it in a way which not only goes undetected and unreported... but he has to provide good content, otherwise, it won't get clicks in the SERPs and will drop out anyway. Plumber B, still has to provide good content.... as does Plumber A. The only question is "all things being equal, who will win".
|
So once again it is about the work a person puts into his site. NOT ABOUT USER EXPERIENCE.
Again you keep making my points for me.