Quote:
Originally Posted by trevesty
My understanding is that the land in question(as well as other remote areas of Nevada) were in dispute amongst claimants(ranchers, miners, etc) at the time right before statehood, thus the federal government took over the titles to these properties to expedite the process of making Nevada a state. The idea was to sell the land back to the state and/or an auction of sorts amongst those claimants. This last part never happened, so the BLM has been in control since that agency was created.
That also doesn't sound as good in a blog article meant to stir up fervor of "lol government bad".
|
myunderstanding of this was the right to graze cattle would remain, land ownership regardless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla
|
cooler heads prevail.