Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
So, why do you think the MPAA, RIAA, and software companies aren't banging your door down to work with you. You claim you've achieved something on a very, very small budget they have failed to achieve after decades and billions of dollars...
Seems odd doncha think?
 |
Rest assured, Adultking . / . Copycontrol is not working in conjunction with The Motion Picture Association or The Recording Industry Association investigators.
It's laughable at best mentioning those companies in the same sentence with Adultking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
This has been explained to you many times, but I'll explain it again.
We have a collaboration system backend in which stakeholders participate. You are not a part of that system so you have no idea who we work with or what communication we have with any organisation.
All you know is what I post to GFY, which is a fraction of what we do.
You're on the outside Damian, you're not a stakeholder and you are certainly not qualified to talk about who we collaborate with and how we undertake our operations.
|
Interesting factoid Robert King.
To put it in layman's terms,
Copy Control is not a licensed private investigation company legally able to look into open share folders, take screenshots, legally post screenshots, download copyrighted files or obtain offending IP addresses or names.
Mum's the word due to a majority of Copy Controls compelling evidence is obtained illegally. On a few occasions Adultking was instructed to remove & suppress his illegally obtained screenshots and information off these forums.
Food for thought.