I would have another question here, if possible. This one is a little more advanced, related to one of the questions, that I've already asked.
There are two networks of pornstar blogs:
1) http://MyPornstarBlogs.com - 1206 blogs total.
2) http://PornstarBlogWorld.com - 259 blogs total
All websites can be viewed, and compared, but they are all based on the same model (meaning, set 1 and 2, not all of them together). Websites 1 are older, and they receive regular updates. The first network of websites gets around 400k uv a day, and 40% of traffic comes from Google.com. The second network of sites, receives only around 7,5k uv a day, with 18% of traffic from Google.com (other search engines too, but these are not included).
One thing, that could be done, in order to improve performance of the smaller network (this is the question here), would be to schedule posts, and update all websites, at least once per month (I understand that twice a month would be better, once a week even better, every five day, even better, and so on).
All websites are connected to the same social media accounts. You said, that this is not good for the websites. Would you just delete it? The thing with this, should be, that accounts receive a lot of automatic followers from the websites (and very relevant, interested in the sites), and it would be a lot easier to promote these websites, on the included social media accounts. Would you say something like this is not good, and not worth it? I think, that accumulating a lot of relevant followes, on all social media accounts, that can be useful, can be a very good thing. Would you delete it all, anyway (follow us on social media section), and just dont worry about the social sites at all? Does it really affects the rankings of the websites in google.com, and other search engine sites?
What else can be done with the #2 network, in order to make it as successful, as the network #1. Regular updates, are probably the most important, but what else can be done here, in order to improve the search engine results?
Thanks.
|