View Single Post
Old 01-08-2015, 11:21 AM  
PAR
Confirmed User
 
PAR's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyber View Post
The conclusion must be that there exist sponsors who can magically provide legal licensed jailbait content? How is that possible?

Isn't it technically impossible for a girl to sign a legally binding model release contract if she hasn't reached the age of consent yet?
Not defending AK, that term should really not be used to define content on an adult site.
I have seen it used a few times but never see it as a great term to use.

I do wondering if he is using the term (rather stupidly) in-place of "barely legal"...
If so then the lineup of people with full 2257 of such content is long...

But then, it could also be of non nude pics (still a stupid term to use) and I'm not sure we here can say much about that with the hot girl on FB thread no on how many pages. I think it could be assumed that not all are over 18 and people posting them may not have 100% right to do so.

Regardless or the content why would someone opt to use the very term on an adult site?
PAR is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote