Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua G
problem is your premise. its the "should be allowed" part. as if the USA or anybody else can control what iran wants to do. they will do it if they want, agreement or not.
the key problem, dyna mo, is the USA telling other countries they cant have nukes while we say we have to have them. there is an issue of class amongst the nations where the have-nots feel second class to the haves. this is understandable given how we care so much about useless north korea.
fact is, until the USA gives up nukes, we are hypocrites to tell any other nation they cant have them. So who cares if crokett or anything else thinks what iran "should be allowed" to do. such an imperialist thought you made.

|
it's not my premise, Joshua G.. Moreover, Joshua G., it's NATO and the entire western world USA is representing here.
Finally, Joshua G., no it's not hypocritical. you seem to think the world can put the nuclear genie back in its bottle, that's not reality.
But thanks Joshue G. for letting us know you have no problems with more nukes in the ME. somehow that's OK, because the opposite would be hypocritical and that's much worse.
