Originally Posted by dyna mo

so you disagree that the debate distracts from taking real action? why does everyone need to agree on an unbelievably complex science subject? literally only a few people on the entire planet can grasp the subject and even then they struggle.

was listening to a climatolagist super expert on a morning news show sunday, he was being interviewed on account of the 5% snowpack measurement. He ended with guaranteeing everyone listening that it will not rain again in California for >8 more months. it rained solid here last nite. and for me, that doesn't mean man-made global warming doesn't exist, it highlights that if the one side is going to make the science behind taking action the critical issue, then you have to be right on things like guarantees else that puts a chink in the armor and allows doubt, which stops action.

the science is settled is a phrase that encompasses all of those errors in judgement.

that's why i like the old 1970s ad campaign- give a hoot, don't pollute. it was simple and effective, like most take-action projects are and need to be.


woodsy's the man! i mean owl.