Quote:
Originally Posted by newB
Read that 'finding out' as incontrovertible proof - not as a cover story concocted to protect those involved. However, assume for a moment that is exactly what happened - what proof would you need in order to accept it? Video footage of him flailing about in the back of the police van before collapsing, maybe? Anything short of that will be perceived as a coverup.
My advice to the people of Baltimore would be to board up your windows and make sure your insurance premiums are paid, but don't sink a dime of your own money into fixing things until all this is well and truly over.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newB
Read that 'finding out' as incontrovertible proof - not as a cover story concocted to protect those involved. However, assume for a moment that is exactly what happened - what proof would you need in order to accept it? Video footage of him flailing about in the back of the police van before collapsing, maybe? Anything short of that will be perceived as a coverup..
|
Of course he won't change his view. The narrative was determined the moment there was a body and facts had nothing to do with it, as per usual. It's good to be someone like the rioters, looters and brassmoneky/blackmonsters. If there is incontrovertible proof that Grau did it to himself, they will just say "it's bullshit" and further proof of corruption. If there is proof the police did it, they get to say "I told you so". It's win/win for them no matter what and their "win" comes at the expense of another city turned into a war zone and because they believe themselves to be right, they get to rationalize and justify a city being turned into a war zone. The truth is always the first casualty of conflict