Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
That's what I was talking about here: https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...luff-isis.html
Should not be a fun for the locals actually. However those cruise missiles should not detonate if they don't hit the target, so there must be no victims IMHO.
P.S. The only thing I don't like in those "news" is "unnamed US officials say". WFT is "unnamed officials"? A homeless drunk street whore? Why don't they mention the source? Who should we trust to? So if the information is correct, those "officials" have nothing to be afraid of, am I right? When I read the Russian news, I can always see the source of the information, because otherwise it's just a rumor, but not a proven fact. Who in the sane mind will want to read a "rumor newsletter"? I don't want to call it a bullshit, but please show the sources and bring some facts (e.g. satellite pictures etc). "He said, she said" arguments don't work here. We need facts and details. |
"Unnamed officials" are usually military brass who don't have the written authorization to release info to the press but are not releasing classified info. Meaning it's ok the press is told but they aren't an "official" spokesman or it wasn't an official press release.