Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
The "World Health Organization" ruled by whom?... 
Man, the only excuse for your mumbling about profit of circumcision for health is that "foreskin may lock microbes inside after a sexual act", but let's get real... You are not some Arab nomad and not Moses in the sands. You are a modern man and I believe that even in your trailer you have a hot water and a piece of soap. Haven't your schoolteacher of anatomy told you that you must wash your penis with a soap after every (yes, I say EVERY) sexual contact? This is obvious, isn't it? Course if you are a dirty camel who say: "I don't need to clean my cock because I'm circumcised" - that's your choice. You may even don't wipe your ass and don't wash your hands after a toilet. Good luck on that  |
Are you going to discredit peer-reviewed studies? Is there a big conspiracy to shame uncircumcised men?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127372/
-The majority of men who are HIV positive have been infected through the penis
-There is conclusive epidemiological evidence to show that uncircumcised men are at a much greater risk of becoming infected with HIV than circumcised men
-The inner surface of the foreskin contains Langerhans' cells with HIV receptors; these cells are likely to be the primary point of viral entry into the penis of an uncircumcised man
-Male circumcision should be seriously considered as an additional means of preventing HIV in all countries with a high prevalence of infection
-The development of HIV receptor blockers, which could be applied to the penis or vagina before intercourse, might provide a new form of HIV prevention