Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
Still don't understand? Let me explain this for you, retard. The analogy is saying that Trump is throwing around wiretapping accusations because his campaign and administration is guilty of collusion with Russia. Why would he need to make these claims if there was nothing there?
Does anyone you know not want to punch you in the face because you're so brain dead?
|
You do know they can wiretap people illegally, right?
Where's the proof and evidence that there was any collusion? And what is the purpose of this collusion? Please provide evidence