Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
I hear what you are saying but that doesn't mean they can't contribute. You take that same argument and compare men and you get the same issues. It is a myth that they are all 220 lbs dynamos made of solid muscle who move in perfect form at all times and shoot centre mass with their eyes closed. That is simply not true. They are people and they range like the rest of us. Some are better soldiers than others, some are faster, some are stronger, some are smarter but all of them can function as a unit in whatever way helps the core best. A large part of basic is placement. They don't lump everyone together, they are assigned to a specific unit that suits the core best and there is no reason to deny anyone from contributing their part IF they make the cut.
but yeah, making 'gender neutral' titles is ridiculous.
|
Male soldiers aren't the same, their endurance varies.
But then there are female soldiers, whos strength and endurance varies. And they are a couple levels below men.
So if you take the strongest female soldier, she can barely compare to the weakest male soldier.
All in all, if you factor in personal "variables", women still can't compete with men on the battlefield.