Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
aha and because you did NOT DO IT you know ?
|
I know from testing, I know because I have studied Google's practices extensively over a long period of time while developing my own search technology.
I also read. In 2008 Google made it clear about Static vs Dynamic pages. They have not changed this advice.
The only benefit a static page would have, if that page does not dynamically load resources because it's pure HTML, is one of page speed. Obviously a plain HTML file will load quicker when served direct from the web server, as opposed to being generated on the fly by a CMS. However page speed is not the only ranking factor when it comes to generating SERPS.
https://moz.com/blog/dynamic-urls-vs...is-still-clear
https://webmasters.googleblog.com/20...atic-urls.html