View Single Post
Old 01-03-2019, 10:50 AM  
marcop
Content Producer
 
marcop's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio View Post
you dumb twat...there is nothing wrong with a journalist editing a photo to present his story better...nothing in that photo is a lie...he inserted a standing guy to give the photo better composition and it is not a dishonest edit because he took the picture of the standing guy in the same concentration camp...there is nothing morally wrong with what the photographer did nor does it change the meaning of the photograph in any dishonest way...the original photo begs for the right side to be filled considering it will be printed in black and white...furthermore, the prisoners of war who are lying down do not really demonstrate how skinny they are...the standing one does...this justifies the edit in every professional way possible...it is what every good journalist or photographer would do and it does not compromise them in any way...

your argument could not have a smaller penis
News organizations have very strict rules about the editing of images--photojournalists have been fired for making alterations way less noticeable than the removal of the person in that concentration camp photo. More info:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nal-image.html

10 Photojournalists Disciplined For Doctoring Pictures - Listverse
marcop is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote