Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
it depends what you want to do.
i know some blog sites with quite good results per unique visitor but you know the result between 1000x1 and 1x1000 is actually the same.
if you are focused on selling a specific product you will possibly do better with blogs.
if you donīt care what products you sell and you are familiar how to "talk with google"
you are possibly doing better with a tube.
but a very big handycap is WP (except you are one of a million who REALLY knows how to get the right things out of it). WP might be a solution for blogs but not for a tube with really high traffic.
I know a lot of people using WP with tubes but i do not know even ONE who run a really big site with a few 100 k or million per day users.
they might exist but I personally havenīt seen anyone getting really on the tops with WP and embedded videos from the big tubes.
|
A lot of my content now has moved from WP sites to a Headless CMS. I write lightweight front ends in Laravel to present data sourced from an API exposed by the Headless CMS.
That way I can centralise the content and distribute it via CDN and present that same content a zillion different ways depending upon the facing front end.
For example with a Headless CMS you could have embeds data, photos and photo galleries, blog posts, any kind of content you like and keep it all on one central repository. Then you could write very simple front ends to present the content fetched via your Headless CMS API.