View Single Post
Old 03-29-2020, 07:33 AM  
celandina
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoGuy View Post
Did you actually read the article in the linked thread?

What am I confusing? What distinction do I not see? You are the one who seems misguided. Are you saying it's ok for adults to watch actual rape videos of UA girls and fantasize about them? Are you saying it's ok for adults to fantasize about UA girls in their minds, if they don't act on their impulses and have physical contact? Are you saying watching or possessing CP is ok and victimless?

While there may be some protection for artistic creation under the First Amendment, there are exceptions. See how far you get if you create or distribute something that the government classifies as obscene. There's a reason why billers don't process payments for sleep porn, even though it's scripted and consensual.
I have NO doubt that somewhere there " float" real rape videos, just as killing videos and certainly pedo videos and other such "shit".. AND YES !! the perps of these, if found, should be severely punished ( if it was up to me, I shoot then out of hand) ! HOWEVER, you are talking about PornHUB ( yes they steal videos, but that is not under discussion now) and other legit sites where they stage some sort of fantasy like Dollcet, Crux, Ponies, BDSM of all kinds and yes even " school girls".....and that is what I was talking about. Anybody with reasonable IQ can distinguish the real thing from staged (acted) material. And as I have said elsewhere a woman whio is over 18 years should be able to enter into an legal agreement to perform what ever she feels suits her.

and BTW 1: I consider British Board of Censors or some "local" US obscenity backwater as illegal statutes. In the 70 ties you went to jail if you were a homosexual and it was according to a valid law ! It was legal in Germany to kill Jews. It is still legal in Middle East to marry 9 years old girls yada yada...

and BTW 2 I did read the article and can only say that if true, it would have been an exception, otherwise PH execs would be doing a hard time by now. As for the whole GirlsDoPorn saga ? It was all about women not reading a fine print of their agreements. Their victory is quite dangerous since it confirms the view, that a woman is not mentally or intellectually competent to enter into a legally binding agreement.

and BTW 3: We agree that billers do not process sleep porn ( and all other staged/acted porn I have listed above), because they are scared of VISA pulling their privileges.
celandina is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote