V_RocKs

I am referring to DMCA complaints sent to Google. There are no "crap ones" in this case because Google acts on all complaints. Even when they don't give correct information that should be denied just because it is crap.

For instance... Lets say I run a cam site called Chaturbate.com and the complaint states that I want Chaturbate.com/modelprofile removed from Google because it infringes on my content located at: Chaturbate.com/modelprofile

Now, any monkey with half a brain should say, denied! Why? Because the URL you are complaining about is the same as the URL you are using as your proof of ownership of the content.

But now lets say you own something like Nudelive.com and the same thing happens. How does it make any sense? It doesn't and that is why there are no "crap ones" with Google.

Just the other month or so a model from OnlyFans got one of my sites index page banned in Google. How? Why?

She said I infringed on her somehow. How? I have no fucking clue because my site pushes porn sites like Brazzers, Evil Angel and Scoreland. So there is ZERO way for her to have been on my site since she doesn't do hardcore porn and only does pornographic stuff on her OnlyFans profile. All of my marketing materials come from the sponsors in question and none of them used her in them.

But... my index page is banned. So yeah... there are no crap ones with Google.

However... we do get DMCAs sent to Google from models who haven't done anything meaningful in 2 years or more. And they are basically trying to erase themselves from the Internet anyway that they can. In this case we delete their profile and content and then ignore the DMCA. The complaint is only for their page so no use in crying over it if she isn't a money maker.

But... if she is a money maker. We will counter with her content being owned by whatever respective party shot it or were able to include it into marketing materials. And get it reinstated. If she really wants to fight it she should have went to the content owners first and had them contact us. That happens from time to time and we remove it. No use in biting the hand that feeds you.

We also get requests from models/performers directly. If they are no longer active we almost always remove them. Unless they are a money maker. Then they can bring it up with the company that pays us. If they are still active we have a template that explains why we are able to use the content in question and what affiliate marketing is. If they have more questions, send them to their own management company. And we send them to spam so that any more banter goes to spam.