Quote:
Originally Posted by plsureking
there's definitely a money incentive  |
Excuse the following novel, but I'm actually pretty mind-blown by just how much money is involved here, considering it's early days and a relatively small simple site producing worthless pictures, and in how much potential porn AIs have the more I think about it.
I mean if you ever rued the switchover from fat hairy bellies, mustaches and sideburns to plastic tits, hairspray and bleach, you could relive the glory days of porn with AIs from companies with 60s and 70s archives.
With training on material from a particular porn star, users could create more of that model, to their heart's content.
You could put 21st century pornstars into 1970s settings, or vice versa.
(All with official approval and royalties duly paid to the models, of course, because ethics, apart from being the right thing to do, is also the smart thing in today's social media world).
Any porn star, genre, type, 60s, 70s, hard, soft, medium, rare can be re/created. When video AI is more established, cam models could train AIs on all the recordings of themselves out there and retire, with their fans having an endless supply of content they get to direct.
One thing content owners should not make the mistake of doing is trying to produce their own 'new' material from old and trying to sell it. That's dinosaur thinking.
The fun and attraction of porn AIs, as Pornpen shows, is users having the freedom to create their own stuff the way they want it. For most it's probably not even about making something to jack off over, but just messing around, or a creative/artistic exercise.
If I was a CEO at Big Porn, with a lot of content in the vaults, I'd already be on the phone to Pornpen to talk about licensing or otherwise using the tech, preferably exclusively, the way Microsoft did with ChatGPT.
(And I'd definitely give whoever posted such an idea in forum at least 10% of such a deal.)