Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
No. AV laws are not based on what someone can see they are based on what the site actually sells or offers to its members or visitors...
|
couldn't one legally do something like a SFW tour, and then for those in the AV states they need to verify after clicking the join button?
wouldn't that technically comply with the laws as no one in those states could join without verifying? if a person in an AV state hits a wall before being able to enter payment info, that would NOT be offering adult content w/o AV, correct? unless they know how to use a VPN of course
still cheaper than verifying every visitor, or blocking a huge state like Texas
could something like that keep one legally safe/not risk their processing?
curious as to your thoughts on the above. I get that every AV state wrote their own law but is there an over-arching theme relating to SFW tours with AV prior to reaching the join page?
or in the case of free sites driven by affiliate rev, SFW graphics/ads leading to the juicy stuff the AV paywall on the sponsor sites
curious as well how this has affected cam aggregator sites. for ex, if an aff has a site featuring cb cams (not a WL), are those blocked to anyone viewing from Texas etc?
the whole thing is bullshit, we all know it's about an attack on adult and cost-prohibitive for smaller sites (which is really the aim of these govs, they don't give a fuck about protecting minors or adult user privacy)
I just think the more we learn about the specifics of each law the more effectively our industry can strategize. and yes, also fight them in court