Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd
If I am a surfer why would I PAY to enter a site just to see a tour?
|
every site with NSFW content, should or must have AVS, an impossible situation, but for now, is happening
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerulean
This is basically the problem with these laws, and why they will absolutely destroy the economy of legitimate adult content.
My understanding is that the safest approach is to verify people before they hit the tour, and since there is no state-provided age verification system, sites have to either eat this cost for every user, or pass it on to the users before they see the tour.
As you said, why would a surfer pay to view a tour?
|
This would be good if there was a state provided AVS, no cost to no one, yes, this could work
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseQuinn
word
as a performer there are sites I can't use cuz apparently my face doesn't match my passport. a doc issued last year. in fairness the photo is awful but I think that's the law for passport pics
using the same cam I use to actually work in this biz (my beloved logitech), with great lighting, on some sites I cannot verify. at best they force you to switch to a phone if on laptop. not an inconvenience/hassle in any way
now imagine a man, who may have grown new facial hair or removed it since his last ID photo, just chilling in his bedroom with crap lighting and a shitty webcam tryna actually pay for porn?
madness
|
agreed...
many times iīve had similar problems, verifying for tubes and other sites & a big red x, re do, better lighting needed & things like this...
could be a real pain in the ass for any one wanting to jerk off over some porn
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseQuinn
curious about this too
|
MC couldnīt have some sites with & some without, as, if the site is viewed in UK, then by law, needs AV, no choice....