Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
I’m not choosing your made-up binary.
Legacy is not my employee. If he overstated his role on LinkedIn, that’s on him not me. Ask him, not me.
You released public software. It had security issues. You claimed they are now fixed after being pointed out. Good.
Done and done.
|
You don't get to "done and done" your way out of this, Mark.
You keep saying "ask him, not me" - but TheLegacy named YOU specifically.
Post #61 in this thread, TheLegacy wrote that "Mark Prince reviewed the code" and found the issues. He didn't say "some guy" - he said YOUR NAME.
So either:
TheLegacy coordinates with you and you're lying about the relationship
TheLegacy is making up that you reviewed code you never saw
Which is it?
And "overstated his role" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
"Chief Program Director in charge of Marketing and SEO" isn't an overstatement - it's a completely fabricated executive position at your company. For four years. That's not a LinkedIn whoopsie.
You're also still dodging:
Why did you ask me the same questions 11 times after being told to leave? That's not scrutiny. That's harassment.
Why did you post "This is your last chance to prove your SEO really works" if you weren't questioning my honesty?
You want "done and done" - answer those two questions and you can have it.
