Baddog>>Could it be that adult webmasters are so politically unaware, that they are do not know when they are supporting someone whose political beliefs are so diametrically opposed to their own with their hard earned dollars? Or was Dave Thomas such a great spokesman that he could have any political belief, no matter how inane, that you would still support him financially?<<
Two condemnations here, one for Dave's INANE political albeit religious beliefs, and second, condemning all braindead GenX'ers who haven't grown their hippie activist hair long enough for your personal taste, albeit inane.
Another condemnation, "Your argument, while I am sure is valid in your own mind, makes little sense. Sorry."
Again the narrow mindedness you attribute to the Lifers creeps back into your own posts. Both you and Amputate miss my point entirely. I never said Pro-Life wasn't a one-trick pony, I simply stated that the "Pro-Choice End of Story" attitude on this thread is the same NO CHOICE argument you CONDEMN in the Lifers.
I'm pro choice personally, but I never say it, because I find Choicers to be extremely hypocrytical in their debates against Lifers. Lifer's are no bargain either, but there aren't enough on this thread to take up that argument.
My Wendy's is open 24 hours by the way (ok I'm lying)
Nz
|