|
I have a question for those who think Bush should attack Saddam (I'm neutral in the debate - just curious). What makes you think he will be easy to find/catch? I mean he has like 20 palaces, underground tunnels and the like. Ben Ladin had only caves and maybe a couple of tunnels to hide and he ran away. Saddam might lose the control of Iraq but most likely he will be harder to find than Ben Ladin and probably escape.. And if he got all these massive-destruction weapons, I would guess he will run away with them - or samples of them, along with his "elite" force. So in the end, besides taking the control of the country, the US army won't have changed anything about the threat level.
Anyway all this to say that when everybody talks about attacking Iraq, they always seem to imply Saddam will be easy to catch or don't mind about him; anybody ever thought he will most likely run away? HE is the threat after all..
|