cropping erotic photos, what are the rules/guidelines?

[dyna mo]

what's the rule for cropping above or below the knee? cropping out an arm. things like that. what are the rules for where to put such crop lines?

[Vendzilla]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

what's the rule for cropping above or below the knee? cropping out an arm. things like that. what are the rules for where to put such crop lines?

NO rules, we don't need no stinking rules

Depends on what you're using the cropped image for

[bronco67]

Just don't cut out the titties.

[fatfoo]

The crops can be for categories. Crop feet for foot fetish.

[L-Pink]

It's more aesthetically appealing to crop before knees and elbows.


.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

It's more aesthetically appealing to crop before knees and elbows.


.

before = above? so thighs and upper arms?

[TeenCat]

crop head, tits and pussy, keep the rest ...

[dyna mo]

here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

[Vendzilla]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

NOt if it's foot fetish site or about her legs

[dyna mo]

another example. is this cropped properly?

[justinsain]

The first internet forum I joined was one about photography. It was filled with mostly beginners with a few intermediate guys sprinkled in and rarely would a professional chime in.

I watched as they went back and forth on all the " rules " of photography and cropping was always a hot topic. Many said that you cannot crop just below a joint ( knee, elbow or above like an ankle or wrist ). I remember a heated discussion about cropping at the shin was an absolute mistake. These were all photographers who probably have never been published yet were setting the rules and criticizing others work.

So later that day I went to the mall and as I was walking though I noticed in the window of at least three major chain womens clothing stores pictures hanging that were breaking all the rules those forum photographers were stating. Here were pictures that were part of a national ad campaign breaking all the rules believed by photographers that will never get a picture in a national ad campaign.

" Beginners follow the rules and an artist has no boundaries " I don't know the source of that quote but I always liked it.

While there shouldn't be any set rule about cropping that would automatically dismiss it as a reject there are a few things that can be done to make the photo more pleasing.

Where you crop at the joint makes a difference and care should be taken not to them look like an amputee. A classic 3/4 shot would start at the head and crop just above the knee in a pleasing point to accentuate the thigh.

Sometimes you might have to crop something out of the background or foreground that would be distracting to the picture. In doing so your crop line might end up being in an undesirable position on the model. Then you have to decide which is more distracting to the overall photograph, bad crop or bad element.

Another factor in cropping is size constraints. If you are going to keep all your pictures the same size you are limited to some extent as to what you can achieve when cropping.

The example you've posted looks fine even though it's broken the " rule " of cropping just below the knee. There is far too much good stuff going on for that crop to be distracting in any way and it would take someone focused on it to even notice it.

When I make a gallery of model pictures I hand crop each one and every so often I'll crop one just below the knee for those that might admire that part of the leg. It's really hard to please everyone all the time but it doesn't hurt to step outside the box and throw them a bone.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by justinsain

The first internet forum I joined was one about photography. It was filled with mostly beginners with a few intermediate guys sprinkled in and rarely would a professional chime in.

I watched as they went back and forth on all the " rules " of photography and cropping was always a hot topic. Many said that you cannot crop just below a joint ( knee, elbow or above like an ankle or wrist ). I remember a heated discussion about cropping at the shin was an absolute mistake. These were all photographers who probably have never been published yet were setting the rules and criticizing others work.

So later that day I went to the mall and as I was walking though I noticed in the window of at least three major chain womens clothing stores pictures hanging that were breaking all the rules those forum photographers were stating. Here were pictures that were part of a national ad campaign breaking all the rules believed by photographers that will never get a picture in a national ad campaign.

" Beginners follow the rules and an artist has no boundaries " I don't know the source of that quote but I always liked it.

While there shouldn't be any set rule about cropping that would automatically dismiss it as a reject there are a few things that can be done to make the photo more pleasing.

Where you crop at the joint makes a difference and care should be taken not to them look like an amputee. A classic 3/4 shot would start at the head and crop just above the knee in a pleasing point to accentuate the thigh.

Sometimes you might have to crop something out of the background or foreground that would be distracting to the picture. In doing so your crop line might end up being in an undesirable position on the model. Then you have to decide which is more distracting to the overall photograph, bad crop or bad element.

Another factor in cropping is size constraints. If you are going to keep all your pictures the same size you are limited to some extent as to what you can achieve when cropping.

The example you've posted looks fine even though it's broken the " rule " of cropping just below the knee. There is far too much good stuff going on for that crop to be distracting in any way and it would take someone focused on it to even notice it.

When I make a gallery of model pictures I hand crop each one and every so often I'll crop one just below the knee for those that might admire that part of the leg. It's really hard to please everyone all the time but it doesn't hurt to step outside the box and throw them a bone.

thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

[ottopottomouse]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

Well there's a woman sat in the way and the music system is all out of focus

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse

Well there's a woman sat in the way and the music system is all out of focus

looks like either NAD or Nakamichi.....

[justinsain]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

Glad my point came across as I tend to ramble on

With photography being a creative art there shouldn't be any rules set in stone however there are plenty of guidelines with the rule of thirds being a fine example.

You can create a photograph to just please yourself or you can create it for an intended audience or create it specifically to a client's requirements. Each one may need a different approach and if you can pull off all three at once it's a great day at work.

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

general guidelines are no amputations of fingers, hands, toes or feet. crop between knee and thigh, but not usually between ankles and feet, except the 'cowboyheadshot' because of the guns

be best to show BOTH hands in a shot... still an amputation if the hand is behind the body etc... now these are photography guidelines, most of the work you see has been gone over by print editors who follow no guidelines what so ever and this is why you see weird stuff in the mags...

there are also different posing for men than women... i.e. masculine and feminine posing... then everything goes out the window shooting for members...

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by bm bradley

general guidelines are no amputations of fingers, hands, toes or feet. crop between knee and thigh, but not usually between ankles and feet, except the 'cowboyheadshot' because of the guns

be best to show BOTH hands in a shot... still an amputation if the hand is behind the body etc... now these are photography guidelines, most of the work you see has been gone over by print editors who follow no guidelines what so ever and this is why you see weird stuff in the mags...

there are also different posing for men than women... i.e. masculine and feminine posing... then everything goes out the window shooting for members...

thank you!