Is the free porn model here to stay? - GoFuckYourself.com

B.Barnato · 06-19-2012, 07:37 PM

Quick, I need to know.

Colmike9 · 06-19-2012, 07:38 PM

Nah, I'm charging $2 Paypal to view FHGs now..

anexsia · 06-19-2012, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B.Barnato

Quick, I need to know.

This is a very good question and I'm surprised no one has asked it before.

Colmike9 · 06-19-2012, 07:41 PM

Like I said before, there's a big difference between samples and free porn, and a lot of people get those confused..

Helix · 06-19-2012, 07:57 PM

The answer you seek is.................Yes!!

Barry-xlovecam · 06-19-2012, 09:06 PM

Broadcast public television has advertiser supported free content -- TV shows, News, Movies, Sporting Events.

The TV networks pay to produce content, buy syndicated content, or license motion pictures.

Cable networks have both subscriber paid and advertiser sponsored content -- USA, History Channel, etc. .

So, assuming there would be "social acceptance" of the porn content advertisers might support it.

I could envision a subscriber paid and advertiser sponsored porn content channel on cable television or that type of content broadcast on the Internet with just advertiser sponsored content or advertiser sponsored and paid subscriber revenue. This cuts the pirates out of the game sorta even though if it is broadcast digitally it can be copied, period.

This would change the flow of copyright licensing revenue to a front end rather than long term revenue stream. Make your money in the beginning before it is infringed upon which will ultimately happen. This "free" advertiser supported distribution would not stop piracy but it would give the creators higher revenue for newly produced product. People do watch advertiser supported entertainment (suffer the commercial advertisement in return for free content) and are willing to pay for access (e.g.; Netflix) even though they can find most of that same content on torrents, etc... Trick is that they could get it free or at low cost legitimately.

Now, the social acceptable advertising might be of issue but there are many mainstream products that may bite, like; Condoms, Sex Toys, Intimate Apparel, Sexual lubricants, and other products of an adult nature that are not welcomed to hawk their wares on public television or "family rated" Internet entertainment (Hulu, Crackle, Youtube, etc.).

So it works like this in concept; 30 Million viewers world wide pay $10 month to watch the content output of 100 industry players and they all get royalties for broadcast rights -- they profit from the volumes and the advertisers do not support infringement the only issue being the social acceptability of the porn sponsored content covering another $160 million? a month ... That is $460 million a month ... Hypothetical numbers however here is no real historical data to use.

Legitimate free Porn is possible but not a likely scenario short term -- 5 or 10 years on the above level?

Yngwie · 06-19-2012, 09:19 PM

it has been here (in this industry) for a VERY long time now. Let just say 1998/99. Maybe not as much as now, but it has been here for a long time and will not go anywhere any time soon.

papill0n · 06-19-2012, 09:23 PM

forget about it

there is a new model coming out next week

alf6300 · 06-19-2012, 09:46 PM

Nope.
Next big thing is paying the surfers to jerkoff.
This is going to be much more popular than free porn.

Tijuana_Tom · 06-19-2012, 10:02 PM

Yes, nobody is willing to fight it.

freecartoonporn · 06-19-2012, 10:59 PM

Yes Off-course not.

bean-aid · 06-20-2012, 12:03 AM

I think in the next 2 years the model will start to erode. I think it will start with youtube and trickle down. I think the model sucks. Can't stand paying BW on these tubes. I own a few, the conversions just totally suck.

Paul Markham · 06-20-2012, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner

I think in the next 2 years the model will start to erode. I think it will start with youtube and trickle down. I think the model sucks. Can't stand paying BW on these tubes. I own a few, the conversions just totally suck.

You're doing it all wrong Ask Nicky. https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=19014244&postcount=81

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicky

Ok let me argue about the ratios. It's more like $10 per 1k on clicked ad traffic and the click ratio is probably 1-20 not 1-50 So we are talking ~$10k a day not 1200. This is from your example though, the largest tubes out there make waaay more than $10k a day....

chaze · 06-20-2012, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B.Barnato

Quick, I need to know.

Nah, they have always used it to get people to sign up.

Soon advertisers will realize they are throwing their money away with these free sites. Why pay when you get it all for free.

At some point people will learn and a new model will be made.

06-19-2012, 07:37 PM	#1
B.Barnato So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 3,618	Is the free porn model here to stay? Quick, I need to know.

06-19-2012, 07:38 PM	#2
Colmike9 (>^_^)b Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 7,223	Nah, I'm charging $2 Paypal to view FHGs now.. __________________ Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet! I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in. I make a lot more money in the medical field in a lab now, fuck you guys. Don't ask me to come back, but do join Chaturbate in my sig, it still makes bank without me touching shit for years..

06-19-2012, 07:41 PM	#4
Colmike9 (>^_^)b Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 7,223	Like I said before, there's a big difference between samples and free porn, and a lot of people get those confused.. __________________ Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet! I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in. I make a lot more money in the medical field in a lab now, fuck you guys. Don't ask me to come back, but do join Chaturbate in my sig, it still makes bank without me touching shit for years..

06-19-2012, 07:57 PM	#5
Helix Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Michigan Posts: 5,954	The answer you seek is.................Yes!! __________________ Free jscott !!! Free OneHungLo !!! Free Baddog !!!

06-19-2012, 09:06 PM	#6
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Broadcast public television has advertiser supported free content -- TV shows, News, Movies, Sporting Events. The TV networks pay to produce content, buy syndicated content, or license motion pictures. Cable networks have both subscriber paid and advertiser sponsored content -- USA, History Channel, etc. . So, assuming there would be "social acceptance" of the porn content advertisers might support it. I could envision a subscriber paid and advertiser sponsored porn content channel on cable television or that type of content broadcast on the Internet with just advertiser sponsored content or advertiser sponsored and paid subscriber revenue. This cuts the pirates out of the game sorta even though if it is broadcast digitally it can be copied, period. This would change the flow of copyright licensing revenue to a front end rather than long term revenue stream. Make your money in the beginning before it is infringed upon which will ultimately happen. This "free" advertiser supported distribution would not stop piracy but it would give the creators higher revenue for newly produced product. People do watch advertiser supported entertainment (suffer the commercial advertisement in return for free content) and are willing to pay for access (e.g.; Netflix) even though they can find most of that same content on torrents, etc... Trick is that they could get it free or at low cost legitimately. Now, the social acceptable advertising might be of issue but there are many mainstream products that may bite, like; Condoms, Sex Toys, Intimate Apparel, Sexual lubricants, and other products of an adult nature that are not welcomed to hawk their wares on public television or "family rated" Internet entertainment (Hulu, Crackle, Youtube, etc.). So it works like this in concept; 30 Million viewers world wide pay $10 month to watch the content output of 100 industry players and they all get royalties for broadcast rights -- they profit from the volumes and the advertisers do not support infringement the only issue being the social acceptability of the porn sponsored content covering another $160 million? a month ... That is $460 million a month ... Hypothetical numbers however here is no real historical data to use. Legitimate free Porn is possible but not a likely scenario short term -- 5 or 10 years on the above level? Last edited by Barry-xlovecam; 06-19-2012 at 09:11 PM..

06-19-2012, 09:19 PM	#7
Yngwie I am an Alien from space Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 11,118	it has been here (in this industry) for a VERY long time now. Let just say 1998/99. Maybe not as much as now, but it has been here for a long time and will not go anywhere any time soon. __________________ ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca Last edited by Yngwie; 06-19-2012 at 09:21 PM..

06-19-2012, 09:23 PM	#8
papill0n Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 15,547	forget about it there is a new model coming out next week

06-19-2012, 09:46 PM	#9
alf6300 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 766	Nope. Next big thing is paying the surfers to jerkoff. This is going to be much more popular than free porn. __________________ --

06-19-2012, 10:02 PM	#10
Tijuana_Tom So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Location: 90210 Posts: 668	Yes, nobody is willing to fight it.

06-19-2012, 10:59 PM	#11
freecartoonporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: NC Posts: 7,683	Yes Off-course not. __________________ SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting \| DigitalOcean

06-20-2012, 12:03 AM	#12
bean-aid So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: the land of woke sleuths Posts: 16,493	I think in the next 2 years the model will start to erode. I think it will start with youtube and trickle down. I think the model sucks. Can't stand paying BW on these tubes. I own a few, the conversions just totally suck.