Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed - GoFuckYourself.com

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 04:28 PM

Ever wonder why gun nuts always seem paranoid?

Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed

Quote:

If you?ve been following the news about Trayvon Martin, the unarmed teen who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch volunteer claiming he acted in self defense, you may be wondering why the man thought the teen was armed. The 17-year old evidently had nothing in his hands except a bag of skittles and a can of ice tea. He never brandished a weapon of any sort, gun or otherwise.

Researchers at the University of Notre Dame may have uncovered the answer: their research suggests that holding a gun influences you to think others have a gun, too.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddis...ers-are-armed/

StickyGreen · 01-14-2013, 04:31 PM

Bullshit...

xNetworx · 01-14-2013, 04:33 PM

Should I imagine they want to buy me lunch instead?

Smut · 01-14-2013, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Ever wonder why gun nuts always seem paranoid?

Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed

http://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddis...ers-are-armed/

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Bullshit...

Right. What do those dummys at Notre Dame know?

We don't need no dumb "studies."

Smut · 01-14-2013, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Right. What do those dummys at Notre Dame know?

We don't need no dumb "studies."

They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

Killswitch · 01-14-2013, 05:04 PM

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut

Stupid? Maybe. But the researchers at one of the finest schools on Earth aren't.

Take it up with them.

Smut · 01-14-2013, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Stupid? Maybe. But the researchers at one of the finest schools on Earth aren't.

Take it up with them.

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=19425041&postcount=6

L-Pink · 01-14-2013, 05:44 PM

ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut

They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

They don't know anything? Who does?

Deej · 01-14-2013, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads... We have nothing to do with guns. I can understand a thread or two.. but not ten a day for a month...

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

It's an important topic. If you don't like them, there are 98,274,552,238,813 other threads on GFY.

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads... We have nothing to do with guns. I can understand a thread or two.. but not ten a day for a month...

It's an important topic.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 01-14-2013, 05:54 PM

This thread needs more syrup...

ADG

L-Pink · 01-14-2013, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

It's an important topic. If you don't like them, there are 98,274,552,238,813 other threads on GFY.

Did some bad man molest you with the barrel of his .45? Now you seek anti-gun attention as a way of lashing out when what you really want is to feel the cold hard steel go up your ass again?

Am I close?

.

StickyGreen · 01-14-2013, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads

It's because the media literally controls what these zombies think about...

Smut · 01-14-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

They don't know anything? Who does?

Just shut your cock hole retard. Go read the article you posted. Go read the source article it was taken from. Go read the lame research attached to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you information. If you want to be informed, do your own fucking research like I did, otherwise, eat my asshole.

Rochard · 01-14-2013, 08:51 PM

I can see this as being true. If you live in fear of everyone else, you start seeing things.

If thought I was threatened by someone, I would leave. I don't want to get into a fist fight over some stupid shit, nor do I want to be involved in a shooting.

kyro · 01-14-2013, 09:24 PM

i agree, i always wonder who is packing heat.

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Did some bad man molest you with the barrel of his .45? Now you seek anti-gun attention as a way of lashing out when what you really want is to feel the cold hard steel go up your ass again?

Am I close?

.

Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

But thanks for that glimpse into your psyche.

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

It's because the media literally controls what these zombies think about...

Yeah. You see the "big picture." Not like us lemmings. You get the "straight dope." You see through the haze of media smoke while the rest of us stumble about in a state of confusion.

dynastoned · 01-14-2013, 10:51 PM

i can't believe some of you guys are still arguing over this shit as if you haven't beaten this topic to death yet... move the fuck on already.

GrantMercury · 01-14-2013, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut

Just shut your cock hole retard. Go read the article you posted. Go read the source article it was taken from. Go read the lame research attached to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you information. If you want to be informed, do your own fucking research like I did, otherwise, eat my asshole.

I read it, dicklick. I read everything I post. I figure it's only polite to do so, if I expect others to spend time on it. It's an interesting study that came out of a outstanding school.

The Ph.D. who conducted the study has an impressive curriculum vitae. http://psychology.nd.edu/assets/8034...kmole_vita.pdf

Smut · 01-14-2013, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

I read it, dicklick. I read everything I post. I figure it's only polite to do so, if I expect others to spend time on it. It's an interesting study that came out of a outstanding school.

The Ph.D. who conducted the study has an impressive curriculum vitae. http://psychology.nd.edu/assets/8034...kmole_vita.pdf

I call bullshit. Give details about the study you read. How many people were in the study? Was this double-blind? How many in the control group? What were the backgrounds of the people? What were the nationalities?

Let's hear what you know about this study.

L-Pink · 01-15-2013, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

But thanks for that glimpse into your psyche.

Everyone has an opinion you seem to have an agenda. And using murdered children as a crutch for getting attention and a reason for your dumb-ass posts is pitiful.

.

StickyGreen · 01-15-2013, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

Who wouldn't be disturbed by that? Bad things happen sometimes in this world, it's far from perfect, and it can't be perfect without taking away people's freedom.

mechanicvirus · 01-15-2013, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut

They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

Smut · 01-15-2013, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

Yes, I am qualified. Please leave this thread before you hurt yourself.

kyro · 01-15-2013, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

i'll take you up on that offer, wire money first

kyro · 01-15-2013, 02:30 PM

I like what this person has to say

I am really tired of the NRA. The second amendment might give people the right to bear arms, but I don't think it was a guarantee outside of a regulated militia. It doesn't say any thing about not taxing it.

I would like to see ammunition taxed at a rate that would recover the cost of swat teams, the increased security made necessary in public places by gun violence, victim compensation, emergency room costs for victims etc. The tax would likely have to be far in excess of the 50% being proposed to cover the costs. We pay all sorts of other user taxes (gas tax for instance), it is only fair to pass the cost of gun ownership to the user instead of the general public. I think it should be applied nationally against gun powder on a per grain of weight basis, to create a fund that reimburses the states for the above cost. I know this is a tall order, so I really appreciate the effort to get it started. Hopefully the national government will finally get it's act together, but I am not holding my breath

GrantMercury · 01-15-2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Who wouldn't be disturbed by that? Bad things happen sometimes in this world, it's far from perfect, and it can't be perfect without taking away people's freedom.

Well, that's one way to look at it. A lazy way, but a way nonetheless.

And do you really think "taking away people's freedom" would make this a perfect world?

GrantMercury · 01-15-2013, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Everyone has an opinion you seem to have an agenda. And using murdered children as a crutch for getting attention and a reason for your dumb-ass posts is pitiful.

.

"An agenda"

Well, if you call wanting sane, common-sense legislation an "agenda," then I guess you're right.

And I'm supposed to ignore the fact 20 children were obliterated by a lone gunman wielding weapons of war? Is that your plan?

GrantMercury · 01-15-2013, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut

I call bullshit. Give details about the study you read. How many people were in the study? Was this double-blind? How many in the control group? What were the backgrounds of the people? What were the nationalities?

Let's hear what you know about this study.

I read the article that I posted. That's all I meant. I'm not privy to the research papers.
http://newsinfo.nd.edu/news/29684-ho...esearch-shows/

The actual study will be published here: http://www.apa.org/about/index.aspx

L-Pink · 01-15-2013, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

"An agenda"

Well, if you call wanting sane, common-sense legislation an "agenda," then I guess you're right.

And I'm supposed to ignore the fact 20 children were obliterated by a lone gunman wielding weapons of war? Is that your plan?

Fuck you, all you care about is getting attention with thread after thread rehashing the same old shit.

.

GrantMercury · 01-15-2013, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Fuck you, all you care about is getting attention with thread after thread rehashing the same old shit.

.

Fuck you. It's an important issue and should be the subject of rigorous debate. If you aren't interested in the subject, read another thread.

GrantMercury · 01-15-2013, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyro

I like what this person has to say

I am really tired of the NRA. The second amendment might give people the right to bear arms, but I don't think it was a guarantee outside of a regulated militia. It doesn't say any thing about not taxing it.

I would like to see ammunition taxed at a rate that would recover the cost of swat teams, the increased security made necessary in public places by gun violence, victim compensation, emergency room costs for victims etc. The tax would likely have to be far in excess of the 50% being proposed to cover the costs. We pay all sorts of other user taxes (gas tax for instance), it is only fair to pass the cost of gun ownership to the user instead of the general public. I think it should be applied nationally against gun powder on a per grain of weight basis, to create a fund that reimburses the states for the above cost. I know this is a tall order, so I really appreciate the effort to get it started. Hopefully the national government will finally get it's act together, but I am not holding my breath

Some good ideas in there. I imagine they would to appeal to any "fiscal conservative" or libertarian who understands the cost of gun violence in taxpayer dollars.

Quote:

In this report we share the findings of the Center for American Progress?s survey of the monetary costs incurred as a result of the murderous rampage at Virginia Tech five years ago. This paper assesses this cost at $48.2 million for the taxpayers of the United States and the commonwealth of Virginia, and for Virginia Tech, a public university. This report also demonstrates how the loopholes in the background-check system failed to protect American citizens from an armed and dangerous Seung-Hui Cho, costing innocent lives?many of them young ones. This was compounded by the legal use of high capacity magazines which transform often traditional firearms into killing machines.

http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/1134

L-Pink · 01-15-2013, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury

Fuck you. It's an important issue and should be the subject of rigorous debate. If you aren't interested in the subject, read another thread.

bla bla gun gun bla bla gun bla bla same old shit in every thread you start.

John-ACWM · 01-16-2013, 09:46 AM

brilliance from Notre Dame.

bronco67 · 01-16-2013, 10:48 AM

....it also adds 3 very much needed inches to the holder's dick.

GrantMercury · 01-16-2013, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

....it also adds 3 very much needed inches to the holder's dick.

GrantMercury · 01-16-2013, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

bla bla gun gun bla bla gun bla bla same old shit in every thread you start.

Go read something else then, retard.

01-14-2013, 05:04 PM	#7
Killswitch 👏 REVOLUTIONARY 👏 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 2,152	__________________

01-14-2013, 05:54 PM	#15
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	This thread needs more syrup... ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

01-14-2013, 08:51 PM	#19
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 71,050	I can see this as being true. If you live in fear of everyone else, you start seeing things. If thought I was threatened by someone, I would leave. I don't want to get into a fist fight over some stupid shit, nor do I want to be involved in a shooting. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

01-16-2013, 09:46 AM	#39
John-ACWM Work Work Work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: EU Posts: 20,060	brilliance from Notre Dame. __________________ Video Chat Forum

01-16-2013, 10:48 AM	#40
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	....it also adds 3 very much needed inches to the holder's dick. __________________

01-14-2013, 04:31 PM	#2
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	Bullshit...

01-14-2013, 04:33 PM	#3
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	Should I imagine they want to buy me lunch instead?

01-14-2013, 05:44 PM	#10
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air. .

01-14-2013, 09:24 PM	#20
kyro So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 783	i agree, i always wonder who is packing heat.

01-14-2013, 10:51 PM	#23
dynastoned mmm yeah! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: roseville, ca Posts: 5,061	i can't believe some of you guys are still arguing over this shit as if you haven't beaten this topic to death yet... move the fuck on already.

01-15-2013, 02:30 PM	#31
kyro So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 783	I like what this person has to say I am really tired of the NRA. The second amendment might give people the right to bear arms, but I don't think it was a guarantee outside of a regulated militia. It doesn't say any thing about not taxing it. I would like to see ammunition taxed at a rate that would recover the cost of swat teams, the increased security made necessary in public places by gun violence, victim compensation, emergency room costs for victims etc. The tax would likely have to be far in excess of the 50% being proposed to cover the costs. We pay all sorts of other user taxes (gas tax for instance), it is only fair to pass the cost of gun ownership to the user instead of the general public. I think it should be applied nationally against gun powder on a per grain of weight basis, to create a fund that reimburses the states for the above cost. I know this is a tall order, so I really appreciate the effort to get it started. Hopefully the national government will finally get it's act together, but I am not holding my breath