JohnnyClips aka TheFootMan5: Should he be banned? - GoFuckYourself.com

Harmon · 04-20-2013, 01:34 AM

Now that JohnnyClips is back with a new nick (TheFootman5) after being banned before, should he be re-banned?

kane · 04-20-2013, 01:43 AM

He was banned once. He shouldn't be allowed to just change his nick and come back.

Markul · 04-20-2013, 03:56 AM

So many people come back with a new nick after being banned and according to the rules they should be banned on that new nick.

Personally I just add them to the ignore list and move on.

shake · 04-20-2013, 12:40 PM

Bump for taking out the trash.

Double trouble · 04-20-2013, 01:01 PM

RyuLion · 04-20-2013, 03:24 PM

Voted.............

PR_Glen · 04-20-2013, 08:11 PM

ban all the kooks that voted no as well.. would be a big step to cleaning up this cesspool..

sarettah · 04-20-2013, 08:32 PM

I am remaining neutral. I never see any reason to ban someone. I would much rather watch them getting their ass beat on the board. It's good entertainment.

I couldn't vote no because that includes that part about insightful and his posts are far from insightful. If you had substituted ridiculous for insightful I would have been able to vote.

.

lazycash · 04-21-2013, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

ban all the kooks that voted no as well.. would be a big step to cleaning up this cesspool..

Agreed, ban these morons who think his posts are insightful.

2013, duk75, Matt 26z, nexcom28, ninavain, TheFootMan5

Coincidentally 2013(Chris Butler) and ninavain(simonsynister) have received lifetime bans and are back also with different nicks.

Ringo · 04-21-2013, 01:54 AM

looking for a good point of view?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah

I am remaining neutral. I never see any reason to ban someone. I would much rather watch them getting their ass beat on the board. It's good entertainment.

.

EddyTheDog · 04-21-2013, 03:59 AM

It gives us something to moan about on slow days - Same as sarettah though I can't vote because of the wording...

Dirty F · 04-21-2013, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash

Agreed, ban these morons who think his posts are insightful.

2013, duk75, Matt 26z, nexcom28, ninavain, TheFootMan5

Coincidentally 2013(Chris Butler) and ninavain(simonsynister) have received lifetime bans and are back also with different nicks.

Matt26z, that guy is probably the most fucked in his head conspiracy idiot on this forum.
He is seriously so fucking mentally ill. Johnnyclips looks sane compared to this freak.
I have no clue how this guy isn't locked up somewhere where he can get help.

helterskelter808 · 04-21-2013, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah

I am remaining neutral. I never see any reason to ban someone. I would much rather watch them getting their ass beat on the board. It's good entertainment.

I agree. My personal view is that on a board for supposed adults, with an ignore facility for people who can't use their own brain, there's no reason for anyone to be banned, other than serious abuse like potentially illegal posts or 'deleterious' actions like flooding the board or hacking.

Quote:

I couldn't vote no because that includes that part about insightful and his posts are far from insightful. If you had substituted ridiculous for insightful I would have been able to vote.

I didn't vote because it's not my business who is banned or not, or for what reason. And his posts are no less insightful than the fuckwits spamming non-stop about Bitcoins, hoping to cause it to rise, or childishly calling for bans so they can claim some kind of Internet 'win'.

View Poll Results: Should JohnnyClips aka TheFootMan5 be re-banned?
Yes, please ban this douchebag.	29	74.36%
No, his posts are insightful	6	15.38%
Who the fuck is JohnnyClips?	4	10.26%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

04-20-2013, 01:34 AM	#1
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,007	JohnnyClips aka TheFootMan5: Should he be banned? Now that JohnnyClips is back with a new nick (TheFootman5) after being banned before, should he be re-banned? __________________ [email protected]

04-20-2013, 12:40 PM	#4
shake frc Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bitcoin wallet Posts: 4,663	Bump for taking out the trash. __________________ Crazy fast VPS for $10 a month. Try with $20 free credit

04-20-2013, 01:01 PM	#5
Double trouble So Fucking What? Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 22,251	__________________

04-20-2013, 03:24 PM	#6
RyuLion ClubDomCash.com Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 32,239	Voted............. __________________ Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995

04-20-2013, 01:43 AM	#2
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	He was banned once. He shouldn't be allowed to just change his nick and come back.

04-20-2013, 03:56 AM	#3
Markul Likes Pie Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: The land that liberated porn Posts: 12,401	So many people come back with a new nick after being banned and according to the rules they should be banned on that new nick. Personally I just add them to the ignore list and move on.

04-20-2013, 08:11 PM	#7
PR_Glen Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 9,058	ban all the kooks that voted no as well.. would be a big step to cleaning up this cesspool.. __________________ webmaster at pimproll dot com

04-20-2013, 08:32 PM	#8
sarettah see you later, I'm gone Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 14,099	I am remaining neutral. I never see any reason to ban someone. I would much rather watch them getting their ass beat on the board. It's good entertainment. I couldn't vote no because that includes that part about insightful and his posts are far from insightful. If you had substituted ridiculous for insightful I would have been able to vote. . __________________ All cookies cleared!

04-21-2013, 03:59 AM	#11
EddyTheDog Just Doing My Own Thing Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London, Spain, New Zealand, GFY - Not Croydon... Posts: 25,066	It gives us something to moan about on slow days - Same as sarettah though I can't vote because of the wording...