Google just killed Nudevista.com (OUCH!)

[freak22]

He was doing very good in google for couple of years now. Looks like he got hit pretty hard starting april. Biggest hit i have seen in adult so far.

Any reason as to why?

[FreeHugeMovies]

Google hates pr0n!

[Jel]

damn. panda/penguin wiped out literally 90% of my traffic, but that's a huge hit

[amateurcanada]

wow

[tokmansta]

damns, thats huge

[freecartoonporn]

time to take panda seriously.

[nexcom28]

The funny thing is it's still ranking at 858 in Alexa, dropping 200+ places yet page views and time on site are shown as being up.

[Mutt]

where does that graph come from?

[NinjaSteve]

Look OK from here https://siteanalytics.compete.com/nudevista.com/

[freak22]

Anyone know the cause of this? Couple of things:

1] All this content is scrapped from other tubes (title, tags, thumbs). (zero original content)
2] He has TONS of paid links from adult blog networks
3] There are better search sites on the market. They prob gets more "time on site" than him.

[nexcom28]

[freak22]

Originally Posted by NinjaSteve

Look OK from here https://siteanalytics.compete.com/nudevista.com/

http://suite.searchmetrics.com/en/re...ista.com&cc=US

[HomerSimpson]

Originally Posted by freak22

Anyone know the cause of this? Couple of things:

1] All this content is scrapped from other tubes (title, tags, thumbs). (zero original content)
2] He has TONS of paid links from adult blog networks
3] There are better search sites on the market. They prob gets more "time on site" than him.

4] popups google hates them

[Klen]

Originally Posted by freak22

Anyone know the cause of this? Couple of things:

1] All this content is scrapped from other tubes (title, tags, thumbs). (zero original content)
Irevelant
2] He has TONS of paid links from adult blog networks
Relevant
3] There are better search sites on the market. They prob gets more "time on site" than him.
It's all same shit one way or another

[janosik]

I would say he actually lost a tons of backlinks :



And the second reason why he went down is that he did not buy my
backlinks while his competitors did

[Klen]

Originally Posted by janosik

I would say he actually lost a tons of backlinks :



And the second reason why he went down is that he did not buy my
backlinks while his competitors did

Yes indeed,the sad things at google despise how they constantly bullshit how they monitor tons of signals it's all about backlinks.

[pornguy]

Originally Posted by FreeHugeMovies

Google hates pr0n!

No they hate porn you pay for they Love the tubes though.

Why he got hit I dont know.

[seeandsee]

But they like user uploaded tubes? god loves us all

[arock10]

Google decided that the ridiculous ranks given to the tube searc sites have finally damaged adult enough so they just replaced all nudevistas ranks with YouTube cat videos

[3om3]

fcuk google try bing
verey good with facebook
if u know what i mean

[Jel]

Originally Posted by HomerSimpson

4] popups google hates them

Yet tubes, which dominate the serps, all have them

[~Ray]

never stop building backlinks

[stephane76]

no real content gets my vote.
Titles, descriptions, tags etc are all dups...

[James_Hotmovies]

In April there was a major update that disrupted many sites.

I believe it was some of the copyright issues that Google hinted at combined with bad link neighborhoods.

I've seen a 30% increase in Google traffic since then.

[Lichen]

Originally Posted by janosik

I would say he actually lost a tons of backlinks :



And the second reason why he went down is that he did not buy my
backlinks while his competitors did

he is trying to recover by cleaning up linking profile

[Lykos]

Jesus, that's a hit

[pornguy]

Originally Posted by James_Hotmovies

In April there was a major update that disrupted many sites.

I believe it was some of the copyright issues that Google hinted at combined with bad link neighborhoods.

I've seen a 30% increase in Google traffic since then.

So because I had to DMCA the shit out of tubes they took all my rankings?? The same people I had to dmca took the rankings. How does that work?

Oh wait. they have hundreds of sites and they are willing to pay to keep them listed even though the results are not relevant.

[fris]

no page rank anymore, but still in the top 900 alexa site

[PR_Dave]

Live by google, die by google.

It's as easy as just making a solid good site people actually want to use. SEO is nonsense.

[James_Hotmovies]

Originally Posted by PR_Dave

Live by google, die by google.

It's as easy as just making a solid good site people actually want to use. SEO is nonsense.

a free tube site is a site people want to use and they are a dime a dozen.
without SEO you are nothing.

[Antonio]

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Yes indeed,the sad things at google despise how they constantly bullshit how they monitor tons of signals it's all about backlinks.

Sape all the way

[tokmansta]

Originally Posted by Antonio

Sape all the way

Are you doing direct to sape or a service?

[PR_Dave]

Originally Posted by James_Hotmovies

without SEO you are nothing.

Untrue.

[LeRoy]

Even though you're using embeds, you're still displaying stolen content

http://www.nudevista.com/?q=caribbeancom&s=t

http://www.nuvid.com/video/16695/car...i-wmv-new-0000

I think we've sent a few DMCA's your way too. We also include Google in the notices.

Wonder if Google is taking that into consideration when they killed off your traffic.

[notjoe]

Originally Posted by Lichen

he is trying to recover by cleaning up linking profile

Too late for that. His domain is burned. Might as well pack up shop and close the site down.

[Adult SEO Traffic]

Originally Posted by Lichen

he is trying to recover by cleaning up linking profile

I definitely agree that link velocity is important, especially if your competitors are gaining quality links while you are losing them.

Another important factor is over optimization of anchor text. The discrepancy between total links and referring domains probably means that you have far too many site wide anchor text linking to your site. If you can, contact all of the webmasters where you have site wide anchor text and ask them to change it to the home page only, if you can get these links to be contextual as well then it's even better.

Another problem is that you don't have very many branded keywords. We've come to learn that Google loves branded keywords and naked URLs far more than keyword rich anchor texts recently. This is probably because when someone links to you, they'll most likely link to your brand and not with a carefully researched and high volume keyword anchor text. Branded keywords should be the most linked to your site, but make sure to do this in a natural way from quality and contextual sites.

I see that you've been targeted with negative seo with the keyword anchor text "child porn". I've seen this before and it really hurt the search engine traffic of a site. We were able to get back the search engine traffic with the strategies mentioned above as well as contextual forum and blog comment links from sites within the niche that are below 1 million alexa and get decent search engine traffic. This also helps with your link diversity, as many of these links are no follow. No follow links tend to be "natural" in Google's eyes. So in the bigger picture, no follow links are actually great. I forget which study I read recently but it showed the similarities between sites that have awesome search engine traffic and one of the top aspects of the amount of nofollow links, something to keep in mind.

I hope this helps you. If you need anything else you can contact my email. Best of luck.

[tokmansta]

Originally Posted by Adult SEO Traffic

This also helps with your link diversity, as many of these links are no follow. No follow links tend to be "natural" in Google's eyes. So in the bigger picture, no follow links are actually great. I forget which study I read recently but it showed the similarities between sites that have awesome search engine traffic and one of the top aspects of the amount of nofollow links, something to keep in mind.
f luck.

Probably because google sees these links as mentions

[bluebook18]

that's huge

[PR_Dave]

Originally Posted by Adult SEO Traffic

I definitely agree that link velocity is important, especially if your competitors are gaining quality links while you are losing them.

Another important factor is over optimization of anchor text. The discrepancy between total links and referring domains probably means that you have far too many site wide anchor text linking to your site. If you can, contact all of the webmasters where you have site wide anchor text and ask them to change it to the home page only, if you can get these links to be contextual as well then it's even better.

Another problem is that you don't have very many branded keywords. We've come to learn that Google loves branded keywords and naked URLs far more than keyword rich anchor texts recently. This is probably because when someone links to you, they'll most likely link to your brand and not with a carefully researched and high volume keyword anchor text. Branded keywords should be the most linked to your site, but make sure to do this in a natural way from quality and contextual sites.

I see that you've been targeted with negative seo with the keyword anchor text "child porn". I've seen this before and it really hurt the search engine traffic of a site. We were able to get back the search engine traffic with the strategies mentioned above as well as contextual forum and blog comment links from sites within the niche that are below 1 million alexa and get decent search engine traffic. This also helps with your link diversity, as many of these links are no follow. No follow links tend to be "natural" in Google's eyes. So in the bigger picture, no follow links are actually great. I forget which study I read recently but it showed the similarities between sites that have awesome search engine traffic and one of the top aspects of the amount of nofollow links, something to keep in mind.

I hope this helps you. If you need anything else you can contact my email. Best of luck.

If people applied that much effort to their sites to make them good they wouldn't need "SEO". SEO isn't about gaming GOOG.

[fris]

Originally Posted by PR_Dave

Untrue.

have to agree with you there, just cause your site doesnt rank the best, doesnt mean it doesnt make money.

[TumblrPRO]

Fuck that's crazy.

Now I understand all that people joining the black hat world to take revenge.

[anexsia]

It's funny because I just had a large site e-mail me this past week requesting I take down their paid link because it was "negatively" effecting this SE rankings...yet my site got a HUGE boost from Google the past week .

[nexcom28]

Originally Posted by LeRoy

Even though you're using embeds, you're still displaying stolen content

http://www.nudevista.com/?q=caribbeancom&s=t

http://www.nuvid.com/video/16695/car...i-wmv-new-0000

I think we've sent a few DMCA's your way too. We also include Google in the notices.

Wonder if Google is taking that into consideration when they killed off your traffic.

Hope so..

[brassmonkey]

no more getting a ton of back links from spam sites

[xshake]

this hurts

[TheDatingNetwork]

Maybe it's time to focus generating SEO traffic from Yahoo and Bing since they aren't as picky or difficult as Google. They still account for 25% of daily web searches.