Breast cancer: Pills that cost 8 Cents could treat women with the illness, but not profitable - GoFuckYourself.com

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 10:34 AM

Eight cents pills already routinely prescribed to strengthen bones could save 1,000 lives a year if used to treat breast cancer, according to eagerly awaited new evidence.

However, experts have warned that unless the Government intervenes, many patients could miss out because the drugs are not licensed for use against cancer.

The drugs, known as bisphosphonates, have been used for years to treat the bone-weakening condition osteoporosis.

A new analysis of evidence from 18,766 patients, published in The Lancet medical journal, reveals that among post-menopausal women with breast cancer, the drugs reduced 10-year mortality risk by 18 per cent.

About two thirds of all women with breast cancer could benefit from the drugs, and according to the leading research charity Breast Cancer Now, 34,000 women could benefit and their routine use could save up to 1,000 lives a year.

Continued Breast cancer: Pills that cost 5p could treat women with the illness - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent

kittykatt · 07-24-2015, 10:44 AM

twats. why does it matter? save the tatas

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kittykatt

twats. why does it matter? save the tatas

It would destroy an industry

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

It would destroy an industry

So on one hand, in your deluded and paranoid state, you rationalize your non stop vaccination bullshit by saying your concern is safer medications... and as a common symptom of paranoia, you constantly refer to everything being a big conspiracy.... in this case "big pharma" protecting profits.... yawwwwn.

Now, in this thread, you are saying that a cheap pill can "POSSIBLY" be used to treat some forms of cancer because that plays along with the big bad pharma profit protecting conspiracy,.... AND therefore reason should the drug should not be subject to study, clinical trials etc before being approved for such an use because after all, why should clinical trials to guarantee safer drugs matter... and why should their efficacy and safety be proven? Really all you care about is your conspiracies and verbalizing your paranoid and anxiety.

Makes perfect sense in Bizarro World.

More crazy stuff from a confused and crazy mind. Love it!

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 10:57 AM

Follow the money

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

So on one hand, in your deluded and paranoid state, you rationalize your non stop vaccination bullshit by saying your concern is safer medications... and as a common symptom of paranoia, you constantly refer to everything being a big conspiracy.... in this case "big pharma" protecting profits.... yawwwwn.

Now, in this thread, you are saying that a cheap pill can "POSSIBLY" be used to treat some forms of cancer AND should not be subject to study, clinical trials etc before being approved for such an use because after all, why should clinical trials to guarantee safer drugs matter.

Makes perfect sense in Bizarro World.

More crazy stuff from a confused and crazy mind. Love it!

kittykatt · 07-24-2015, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

It would destroy an industry

whats an industry without tits

Barry-xlovecam · 07-24-2015, 11:00 AM

In the USA the FDA just has to denote off-label use.

Etidronate disodium | definition of etidronate disodium by Medical dictionary
Bisphosphonates (marketed as Actonel, Actonel+Ca, Aredia, Boniva, Didronel, Fosamax, Fosamax+D, Reclast, Skelid, and Zometa) Information

A lot of side effects but as compared to breast cancer they are not so major.

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Follow the money

Yeah, i'll let you send me into a wild scavenger hunt trying to prove your insane points for you. That makes perfect sense to an insane conspiracy theorist... and its an easy cop out to avoid having to actually argue a point yourself.

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kittykatt

whats an industry without tits

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

In the USA the FDA just has to denote off-label use.

Etidronate disodium | definition of etidronate disodium by Medical dictionary
Bisphosphonates (marketed as Actonel, Actonel+Ca, Aredia, Boniva, Didronel, Fosamax, Fosamax+D, Reclast, Skelid, and Zometa) Information

A lot of side effects but as compared to breast cancer they are not so major.

Cheers for the links

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Yeah, i'll let you send me into a wild scavenger hunt trying to prove your insane points for you. That makes perfect sense to an insane conspiracy theorist... and its an easy cop out to avoid having to actually argue a point yourself.

They prioritize profits, not curing cancer

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

They prioritize profits, not curing cancer

Uhmm... a business has to make a profit. It has to make a profit or it can't spend BILLIONS and BILLIONS on research which cures disease such as the pharmaceutical industry does. You know.. the research that enables to modern medicine to treat almost all diseases known to man? The drugs and treatments which have doubled our lifespan in less than 2 centuries.

Sly · 07-24-2015, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kittykatt

whats an industry without tits

Gay porn does well.

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Uhmm... a business has to make a profit. It has to make a profit or it can't spend BILLIONS and BILLIONS on research which cures disease such as the pharmaceutical industry does.

They spend most money on lobbying and marketing, they are not interested in cures, just treating symptoms

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

The drugs and treatments which have doubled our lifespan in less than 2 centuries.

It was improved nutrition and sanitation you'll find

Sly · 07-24-2015, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

They spend most money on lobbying and marketing, they are not interested in cures, just treating symptoms

How do I get my free password to Downblouse Loving ?

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

How do I get my free password to Downblouse Loving ?

Just ask the webmaster over here

Down Blouse Loving Cash

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

It was improved nutrition and sanitation you'll find

of course, your answer to everything "lizard people and massive conspiracies"... this is because you are mentally ill.... not because you "get it", as you and almost any other mentally ill person would like to believe.

Your thread title is a lie and fabrication by you. Because you need to tell these lies constantly to quiet the constant paranoid and delusional chatter in your brain.

Paul&John · 07-24-2015, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

of course, your answer to everything "lizard people and massive conspiracies"... this is because you are mentally ill.... not because you "get it", as you and almost any other mentally ill person would like to believe.

Your thread title is a lie and fabrication by you. Because you need to tell these lies constantly to quiet the constant paranoid and delusional chatter in your brain.

dont feed the troll

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Your thread title is a lie and fabrication by you. Because you need to tell these lies constantly to quiet the constant paranoid and delusional chatter in your brain.

I've repeated the article itself

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul&John

dont feed the troll

There's one troll in this thread, and it ain't me this time

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

I've repeated the article itself

No, you twisted the thread title to say something the article didn't.

Also, my dear self proclaimed researcher, words like "maybe" and "possibly" are pretty fucking important in research and certainly scream "THERE IS NO CONCLUSION HERE"... and say only "this is worth taking a further look at", yet as per usual, you've turned it into a well formed conspiracy because really all you do all day long is seek out info to support a pre-determined narrative and twist it to your liking, while ignoring anything that doesn't support your narrative.

wehateporn · 07-24-2015, 11:29 AM

Then you haven't read the article, you missed the whole point. (but I know you're just trolling, I hope)

The conclusion is that nobody is going to bother pushing them because it won't make money.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

No, you twisted the thread title to say something the article didn't.

Also, my dear self proclaimed researcher, words like "maybe" and "possibly" are pretty fucking important in research and certainly scream "THERE IS NO CONCLUSION HERE"... and say only "this is worth taking a further look at", yet as per usual, you've turned it into a well formed conspiracy because really all you do all day long is seek out info to support a pre-determined narrative and twist it to your liking, while ignoring anything that doesn't support your narrative.

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Then you haven't read the article, you missed the whole point. (but I know you're just trolling, I hope)

The conclusion is that nobody is going to bother pushing them because it won't make money.

Thats an assumption, the pill hasn't been approved for use for this purpose, hasn't been studied, no clinical trials AND YOU added the "but not profitable" part.

You readily make assumptions to support a narrative. Just because the author did as well, doesn't make you any less culpable for your own behavior. The article clearly doesn't state that any study has reached conclusions regarding the efficacy of the pill as a treatment, simply that it "may..." and "possibly.." and "might..."

Do you need a dictionary? Or are you so insane that you translate "possible" into "with 100% absolute certainty"

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:37 AM

btw... not being a paranoid, delusional lunatic that never met a conspiracy i didn't like, as you... doesn't equate to "troll". Thats just another cop out for a weak and broken mind such as yours

PR_Glen · 07-24-2015, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

btw... not being a paranoid, delusional lunatic that never met a conspiracy i didn't like, as you... doesn't equate to "troll". Thats just another cop out for a weak and broken mind such as yours

or in other words...

TheSquealer · 07-24-2015, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

or in other words...

To be fair, he'd probably make a sort of decent Pet Detective.

aka123 · 07-24-2015, 12:13 PM

Pills!!??

They are just trying to sterilize women, population control, illuminati, aliens, lizards. Do you dare to eat pills, even though you don't know what they have put into there? Come on..

By the way, from where you got the "not profitable" part? They sell it. It was about the licensing. I know that the development of antibiotics lack because it is not enough profitable, but not using something that is already there? Hospitals still use and describe the medicines, at least around here. You know, cheaper is better, unless it is corrupted doctor (there have been few of those too).

EDIT: OK, in Murica everything is differently, but you know.. in developed countries.. or something like that. I forgot that insurance stuff and everything shit associated with it.

07-24-2015, 10:34 AM	#1
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Breast cancer: Pills that cost 8 Cents could treat women with the illness, but not profitable Eight cents pills already routinely prescribed to strengthen bones could save 1,000 lives a year if used to treat breast cancer, according to eagerly awaited new evidence. However, experts have warned that unless the Government intervenes, many patients could miss out because the drugs are not licensed for use against cancer. The drugs, known as bisphosphonates, have been used for years to treat the bone-weakening condition osteoporosis. A new analysis of evidence from 18,766 patients, published in The Lancet medical journal, reveals that among post-menopausal women with breast cancer, the drugs reduced 10-year mortality risk by 18 per cent. About two thirds of all women with breast cancer could benefit from the drugs, and according to the leading research charity Breast Cancer Now, 34,000 women could benefit and their routine use could save up to 1,000 lives a year. Continued Breast cancer: Pills that cost 5p could treat women with the illness - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

07-24-2015, 10:44 AM	#2
kittykatt Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: San Clemente Posts: 584	twats. why does it matter? save the tatas __________________ Kira Basciano - Sales Associate Email: [email protected] Skype: kirakittykatt ICQ: sucks Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet available ad spots \| sign up now

07-24-2015, 11:37 AM	#25
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,144	btw... not being a paranoid, delusional lunatic that never met a conspiracy i didn't like, as you... doesn't equate to "troll". Thats just another cop out for a weak and broken mind such as yours __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard

07-24-2015, 12:13 PM	#28
aka123 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: 64 00 N, 26 00 E Posts: 4,450	Pills!!?? They are just trying to sterilize women, population control, illuminati, aliens, lizards. Do you dare to eat pills, even though you don't know what they have put into there? Come on.. By the way, from where you got the "not profitable" part? They sell it. It was about the licensing. I know that the development of antibiotics lack because it is not enough profitable, but not using something that is already there? Hospitals still use and describe the medicines, at least around here. You know, cheaper is better, unless it is corrupted doctor (there have been few of those too). EDIT: OK, in Murica everything is differently, but you know.. in developed countries.. or something like that. I forgot that insurance stuff and everything shit associated with it. __________________

07-24-2015, 11:00 AM	#7
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	In the USA the FDA just has to denote off-label use. Etidronate disodium \| definition of etidronate disodium by Medical dictionary Bisphosphonates (marketed as Actonel, Actonel+Ca, Aredia, Boniva, Didronel, Fosamax, Fosamax+D, Reclast, Skelid, and Zometa) Information A lot of side effects but as compared to breast cancer they are not so major.