News Russia Sends Nuclear War Signals To Turkey

[brassmonkey]

With reports that a nuclear war between NATO and Russia is ?likely,? Russia and Turkey have intensified their war of words after Russia?s latest revenge measures for the downing of its fighter jet.

Russia Sends Nuclear War Signals To Turkey

[ZiggiZiggiCrew]

Lie, as usually...no any problem with Goa
proof ????????? ???????? ????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ?? ???

[EddyTheDog]

Click bait - Really bad article...

[EngineCash]

This is all so intense... But there will be no World War III...

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by EngineCash

This is all so intense... But there will be no World War III...

I believe that WWIII is inevitable. Especially now when there is so many nukes in the World and so many reasons to press the button. Humans always did everything to destroy themselves. This is in our nature.

[j3rkules]

Turkey is a NATO member, not going to happen soon...

[romeo22]

This is getting worse

[dyna mo]

whoever pushes the nuke button next will be on the world's shitlist 10x worse than isis.

[Google Expert]

russkies would be annihilated into stone age within seconds

[2MuchMark]

This shit is getting fucking scary. The world needs to dial it back and calm the hell down a little..

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Muad'Dib

russkies would be annihilated into stone age within seconds

30 minutes, my little friend. Both Russia and the USA need about 30 minutes to annihilate a whole life on this planet. If nuclear weapon won't be used (which is totally impossible IMHO) the situation could be a bit different: Legendary US Army Commander Says Russia Would "Annihilate" US In Head-To-Head Battle | Zero Hedge, In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It?s Not Ready for a War With Putin - The Daily Beast, Pentagon Thinks U.S. Would Lose to Russia in a Fight (War), etc...

P.S. Course the GFY sofa war experts like Muad'Di know the situation much better than some clueless kids like General Raymond Odierno

[$money$]

you got a video?

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

30 minutes, my little friend. Both Russia and the USA need about 30 minutes to annihilate a whole life on this planet. If nuclear weapon won't be used (which is totally impossible IMHO) the situation could be a bit different: Legendary US Army Commander Says Russia Would "Annihilate" US In Head-To-Head Battle | Zero Hedge, In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It?s Not Ready for a War With Putin - The Daily Beast, Pentagon Thinks U.S. Would Lose to Russia in a Fight (War), etc...

P.S. Course the GFY sofa war experts like Muad'Di know the situation much better than some clueless kids like General Raymond Odierno

headsup Ivan, your jet in syria got shot down by a 40 year old f-16 and you fail at comprehending how military budgets maintained during cuts in military spending.

besides, from your link:

Could we probably beat the Russians today [in a sustained battle]? Sure, but it would take everything we had,? one defense official said. ?What we are saying is that we are not as ready as we want to be.?

[kkkkkk]

I was dead before I was born.

[wehateporn]

Let's be realistic for a moment, if nukes were flying, they would quickly get disabled by aliens, alien government would take over with mass reeducation and a new religion, our current leaders would be transported to intergalactic criminal courts and punished severely, it would be a new brighter era for humanity

[Barry-xlovecam]

Stand down Russkis ...
https://www.rt.com/business/324121-r...gainst-turkey/

Real Truth says:
Russian government ratifies economic sanctions against Turkey

Go back to your Vodka :OP

[Struggle4Bucks]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

30 minutes, my little friend. Both Russia and the USA need about 30 minutes to annihilate a whole life on this planet. If nuclear weapon won't be used (which is totally impossible IMHO) the situation could be a bit different: Legendary US Army Commander Says Russia Would "Annihilate" US In Head-To-Head Battle | Zero Hedge, In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It?s Not Ready for a War With Putin - The Daily Beast, Pentagon Thinks U.S. Would Lose to Russia in a Fight (War), etc...

P.S. Course the GFY sofa war experts like Muad'Di know the situation much better than some clueless kids like General Raymond Odierno

Russian minority complex is even more annoying then an American one...

[Tdash]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

headsup Ivan, your jet in syria got shot down by a 40 year old f-16 and you fail at comprehending how military budgets maintained during cuts in military spending.

besides, from your link:

Could we probably beat the Russians today [in a sustained battle]? Sure, but it would take everything we had,? one defense official said. ?What we are saying is that we are not as ready as we want to be.?

Let's not gloat about sucker punches, the Russian jet did not even have time to deploy its flares.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Tdash

Let's not gloat about sucker punches, the Russian jet did not even have time to deploy its flares.

sucker punch? lolz. they know the game, and the rules. nevertheless, cyberschmoe is a joke with his ruskie nukes baloney.

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

30 minutes, my little friend. Both Russia and the USA need about 30 minutes to annihilate a whole life on this planet. If nuclear weapon won't be used (which is totally impossible IMHO) the situation could be a bit different: Legendary US Army Commander Says Russia Would "Annihilate" US In Head-To-Head Battle | Zero Hedge, In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It?s Not Ready for a War With Putin - The Daily Beast, Pentagon Thinks U.S. Would Lose to Russia in a Fight (War), etc...

P.S. Course the GFY sofa war experts like Muad'Di know the situation much better than some clueless kids like General Raymond Odierno

I know you'd like to claim Russia has superior military forces to America's but that's not what those articles say at all. Any conventional war between the US and Russia would happen in Europe, where Russia would have a huge advantage because of logistics, the US being located an ocean away.

One of the articles says Russia is as toothless to attack a Western European country as the US is to attack Russia. It says that Russia's military is constituted to defend Russia's borders against attack and that America's is set up to defend itself from a nuclear attack, since absolutely no country on the planet could even think about getting their boots on American ground.

It took the US two full years to prepare to land forces at Normandy and attack what it knew were weakened Nazi forces. And when it dropped atomic bombs on Japan it did so for one reason, to attack and defeat Japan on its home turf would have cost an estimated 1 million American soldiers lives.

There are idiots who think the US with its massive military budget and might can just show up anywhere in the world and kick some ass, you can thank Hollywood for that. It's no embarrassment to the US that it can't, it's just reality.

A conventional war between Russia and the US fought in the Middle East would be a bloodbath for both sides.

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by kkkkkk

I was dead before I was born.

lol that's actually pretty profound for an idiot

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Mutt

There are idiots who think the US with its massive military budget and might can just show up anywhere in the world and kick some ass, you can thank Hollywood for that. It's no embarrassment to the US that it can't, it's just reality.

Just some statistics. The number of the US Spearhead forces (those that can be dropped anywhere in anytime): 10,000 + about 5,000 of airborne troops in the EU vs Russian airborne troops (VDV): 72,000 + 30,000 of Spetsnaz soldiers. So let's calculate it and we'll have 15,000 vs 100,000. That's a simple math. As about the budget, so Russia doesn't spend a cent to a salary of a regular soldier since he does his military service absolutely for free

Originally Posted by Mutt

A conventional war between Russia and the US fought in the Middle East would be a bloodbath for both sides.

It will be a total nuclear war. Believe me - no one will get alive. Even those who live far away from Russia or NATO countries. That will be the and for all of us

[just a punk]

As an addition to the previous post. NATO is only planning to increase its airborne up to 40,000. Still not enough, because it will be just a bit more than a half of Russian regular airborne forces (40,000 vs 72,000), and it's only 4/3 of Russian Spetsnaz forces (I would not compare Spetsnaz efficiency with regular NATO airborne though...)

[Joe Obenberger]

According to one intelligence site, the recent arrival of Russian S-400 missiles in Syria has resulted in a suspension of bombing missions by the US and Turkey. Another article states that the Russians have eliminated every Turkish site and vehicle in Syria.


DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security

[8pt-buck]

Russia To Deploy New ‘Doomsday Plane’ in Readiness For Nuclear War » Infowars Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

[BaldBastard]

If there was an all out nuclear war USA vs Russia, America wins.

That's because when its over and anyone left goes to help

... well no ones helping the Ruskis are they.

The only hope you would have is that America gets back on its feet, and then they would help you, strange.. but it would be the American way.

[Joe Obenberger]

As a veteran of Army service in Germany during the Cold War - I was stationed at Freedom's Frontier from 1979 to 1982 - I just cannot understand any important reason why the United States and Russia cannot be allies today. All of the ideological reasons for antagonism are gone. With their combined force working together, the world could be transformed in incredible ways for the good and for the peace and security of the world. We did it once before in the war against Fascism and we should do it again, with a free Russia. On these pages, there is endless speculation about World War III and a nuclear exchange between Russia and the US. Can anyone think of one honorable, arguable, decent reason why there should or must be any kind of hostility?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

If there was an all out nuclear war USA vs Russia, America wins.

That's impossible because all life on the Earth will be burned out.

... well no ones helping the Ruskis are they.

If that would be real (which will be not) China would not stay aside... But once again, that's just impossible because there will be no winner.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

As a veteran of Army service in Germany during the Cold War - I was stationed at Freedom's Frontier from 1979 to 1982 - I just cannot understand any important reason why the United States and Russia cannot be allies today.

There are many reasons why not. E.g. the economical ones. But the most important reason is their imperial ambitions. Both countries think they are the special ones and they have a mission. That sounds childish, but that's the real problem + all those Cold War fear reminds.

[L-Pink]

^^^^^^^ ... Plus Russians are assholes.

[Horatio Caine]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

30 minutes, my little friend. Both Russia and the USA need about 30 minutes to annihilate a whole life on this planet. If nuclear weapon won't be used (which is totally impossible IMHO) the situation could be a bit different: Legendary US Army Commander Says Russia Would "Annihilate" US In Head-To-Head Battle | Zero Hedge, In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It?s Not Ready for a War With Putin - The Daily Beast, Pentagon Thinks U.S. Would Lose to Russia in a Fight (War), etc...

P.S. Course the GFY sofa war experts like Muad'Di know the situation much better than some clueless kids like General Raymond Odierno

Unemployed left wing idiot throwing stones at Obama administration and his cuts of military spending

Lets see what Mr Ivanov says (for all clueless and drunk russian - its your chief of the Kremlin administration)

Ivanov gave an interview to the Financial Times (FT, June 21), but his colorful speech lost its edge in translation. Ivanov insisted Russia has no intention of unleashing a war with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which would be ?suicidal? since NATO members? combined defense budgets are much bigger than Russia?s and their combined militaries are equally overwhelming. Ivanov compared NATO to an elephant and a behemoth (the Russian term for hippopotamus), while Russia is ?a pug and a house cat.?

[Horatio Caine]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Just some statistics. The number of the US Spearhead forces (those that can be dropped anywhere in anytime): 10,000 + about 5,000 of airborne troops in the EU vs Russian airborne troops (VDV): 72,000 + 30,000 of Spetsnaz soldiers. So let's calculate it and we'll have 15,000 vs 100,000. That's a simple math. As about the budget, so Russia doesn't spend a cent to a salary of a regular soldier since he does his military service absolutely for free



It will be a total nuclear war. Believe me - no one will get alive. Even those who live far away from Russia or NATO countries. That will be the and for all of us

What a load of horseshit. Good luck getting your VDV across the pond. Post some numbers of Aircraft carrier and Marines. Whats it like 20:1 ?
Fucking idiot 2c

[Horatio Caine]

Just to get the feeling who our drunk russian friend Boris is talking about google " Ray Odierno Obama".
This is the same mother fucker who wants to keep US troops in Iraq and Syria for world domination. Oh yes, this would make us so much stronger Another right wing lunatic real life Vendzilla

The top officer said that the 14 percent reduction in U.S. troops — which shrank the number of soldiers from 570,000 to 490,000 — that the Army has seen since 2010 renders the United States unable to “deter conflict and prevent wars.”

“In my mind, we don’t have the ability to deter,” Odierno explained. “The reason we have a military is to deter conflict and prevent wars. And if people believe we are not big enough to respond, they miscalculate.”

Furthermore, he contended that the Obama administration’s move to cut the Army by 40,000 additional troops over the next two years will prompt our enemies to “question” the United States’ ability to respond to conflict. As a result, U.S. adversaries could “take maybe a bit more risk than they might have just a few years ago.”