Someone Altered Iowa Caucus Results to Favor Hillary Clinton - GoFuckYourself.com

wehateporn · 02-07-2016, 04:25 PM

Iowa â?? Chaos and confusion over Democratic party rules have now been blamed for unilateral changes to Monday nightâ??s caucus results in at least one precinct. As the Guardian reported:

â??In Grinnell Ward 1, the precinct where elite liberal arts college Grinnell College is located, 19 delegates were awarded to Bernie Sanders and seven were awarded to Hillary Clinton on caucus night. However, the Iowa Democratic Party decided to shift one delegate from Sanders to Clinton on the night and did not notify precinct secretary J. Pablo Silva that they had done so. Silva only discovered that this had happened the next day, when checking the precinct results in other parts of the country.â?

Though the night was, indeed, disorganized and mismanaged, as the Des Moines Register noted in an editorial, â??What happened Monday night at the caucuses was a debacle, period. Democracy, particularly at the local party level, can be slow, messy, and obscure. But the refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy.â?

A lack of sufficiently trained volunteer staff wasnâ??t the only issue during and after Monday nightâ??s caucuses. Voter confusion, queues stretching outside, inadequate numbers of voter registration forms, and general mayhem were also reported. Those problems might have been compensated by a diligent tallying of the results â?? but that simply didnâ??t happen.

Party officials informed the Sanders campaign it wouldnâ??t be issuing any statement on results until the morning after, saying â??they would reconvene at 9am and letâ??s talkâ? â?? shortly before issuing the statement of results and delegate counts announcing Clinton had won. As the Guardian pointed out, however, Clintonâ??s lead at present only amounts to slightly more than two-tenths of one percent, or Clinton would receive 23 delegates to the national convention, and Sanders, 21.

But despite this virtual tie, the Iowa Democratic Party has refused to audit the results.

â??The Iowa Democratic Party must act quickly to assure the accuracy of the caucus results, beyond a shadow of a doubt,â? the Register implored. â??A caucus should not be confused with an election, but itâ??s worth noting that much larger margins trigger automatic recounts in other states.â? In fact, â??Too many of us, including members of the Register editorial board who were observing caucuses, saw opportunity for error amid Monday nightâ??s chaos.â?

With so many questions and doubts raised about Monday nightâ??s fiasco, the refusal to audit results only heightens suspicions of both Sandersâ?? supporters and the public-at-large. Clintonâ??s phenomenal coin-toss luck seems inconsequential compared to blatantly switched results â?? no matter if such a switch was accidental or not.

If youâ??ve done nothing wrong, as Homeland Security might say, then you have nothing to hide.

Someone Altered Iowa Caucus Results to Favor Hillary Clinton

dyna mo · 02-07-2016, 04:30 PM

That someone is the DNC.

CaptainHowdy · 02-07-2016, 05:12 PM

Joshua G · 02-08-2016, 05:10 AM

amazes me, & saddens me, there are liberals, like mark prince, suckonthis, tclgirls, who will vote for her just because she is a woman, regardless that a torrent of slime follows her everywhere she goes.

just LOL that all the errors accrued to benefit hilary. slime.

02-07-2016, 04:25 PM	#1
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Someone Altered Iowa Caucus Results to Favor Hillary Clinton Iowa â?? Chaos and confusion over Democratic party rules have now been blamed for unilateral changes to Monday nightâ??s caucus results in at least one precinct. As the Guardian reported: â??In Grinnell Ward 1, the precinct where elite liberal arts college Grinnell College is located, 19 delegates were awarded to Bernie Sanders and seven were awarded to Hillary Clinton on caucus night. However, the Iowa Democratic Party decided to shift one delegate from Sanders to Clinton on the night and did not notify precinct secretary J. Pablo Silva that they had done so. Silva only discovered that this had happened the next day, when checking the precinct results in other parts of the country.â? Though the night was, indeed, disorganized and mismanaged, as the Des Moines Register noted in an editorial, â??What happened Monday night at the caucuses was a debacle, period. Democracy, particularly at the local party level, can be slow, messy, and obscure. But the refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy.â? A lack of sufficiently trained volunteer staff wasnâ??t the only issue during and after Monday nightâ??s caucuses. Voter confusion, queues stretching outside, inadequate numbers of voter registration forms, and general mayhem were also reported. Those problems might have been compensated by a diligent tallying of the results â?? but that simply didnâ??t happen. Party officials informed the Sanders campaign it wouldnâ??t be issuing any statement on results until the morning after, saying â??they would reconvene at 9am and letâ??s talkâ? â?? shortly before issuing the statement of results and delegate counts announcing Clinton had won. As the Guardian pointed out, however, Clintonâ??s lead at present only amounts to slightly more than two-tenths of one percent, or Clinton would receive 23 delegates to the national convention, and Sanders, 21. But despite this virtual tie, the Iowa Democratic Party has refused to audit the results. â??The Iowa Democratic Party must act quickly to assure the accuracy of the caucus results, beyond a shadow of a doubt,â? the Register implored. â??A caucus should not be confused with an election, but itâ??s worth noting that much larger margins trigger automatic recounts in other states.â? In fact, â??Too many of us, including members of the Register editorial board who were observing caucuses, saw opportunity for error amid Monday nightâ??s chaos.â? With so many questions and doubts raised about Monday nightâ??s fiasco, the refusal to audit results only heightens suspicions of both Sandersâ?? supporters and the public-at-large. Clintonâ??s phenomenal coin-toss luck seems inconsequential compared to blatantly switched results â?? no matter if such a switch was accidental or not. If youâ??ve done nothing wrong, as Homeland Security might say, then you have nothing to hide. Someone Altered Iowa Caucus Results to Favor Hillary Clinton __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

02-07-2016, 05:12 PM	#3
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,153	__________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

02-07-2016, 04:30 PM	#2
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,233	That someone is the DNC.

02-08-2016, 05:10 AM	#4
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	amazes me, & saddens me, there are liberals, like mark prince, suckonthis, tclgirls, who will vote for her just because she is a woman, regardless that a torrent of slime follows her everywhere she goes. just LOL that all the errors accrued to benefit hilary. slime.