How exactly does 'liberal' fit in with war crimes and corruption? - GoFuckYourself.com

nico-t · 05-08-2016, 05:05 PM

Apparently liberal voters are pro war crimes and pro corruption. Since those two things describe Hillary Clinton (which is a fact).

I never knew that being liberal means supporting war crimes and corruption. They always say they want peace, are for human rights, that the weak should be taken care of. Seems to me that bombing citizens for oil and keep a currency under control is contradictory to that? So can anyone who supports Hillary explain to me why they support a corrupt war criminal? Thanks.

pimpmaster9000 · 05-08-2016, 05:30 PM

war inc is too big to fail...the US economy is not in a good place and the outlook is not good either, unfortunately the global position of the US dollar and the exploitation of others play a vital role...the USA can not afford not to war...china and russia know this...trump pulling back US troops would make billions for russia and china in weapons sales and deals...you think pooty did not get some concessions from assad?

racketeering is what the USA does...it depends on it and the ruling class make mucho $$$ from it and as I said: the USA can not afford to shut down war inc at this point in time...

but I agree with the stuff you say about hillary its spot on

galleryseek · 05-08-2016, 05:40 PM

The phenomenon exists on the right as well.

The right worships Reagan, (the right, a collective who's supposedly for smaller government), a president that grew the government by 2/3.

There's a lot of contradictions on both sides, and ultimately that's indoctrination speaking, ushered by public education, directed by the state.

ITraffic · 05-08-2016, 05:44 PM

how can one vote for someone who is campaigning on policies which would be war crimes?

Horatio Caine · 05-08-2016, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

Apparently liberal voters are pro war crimes and pro corruption. Since those two things describe Hillary Clinton (which is a fact).

.

I thought you were going to talk about George and Dick. But I guess its Hillary again.

galleryseek · 05-08-2016, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

I thought you were going to talk about George and Dick. But I guess its Hillary again.

They're war criminals too.

klinton · 05-08-2016, 11:40 PM

yes we all know that. Trump is different, Trump is honest, Trump is a real change and hope for America.
just like Barack Obama was

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

Apparently liberal voters are pro war crimes and pro corruption. Since those two things describe Hillary Clinton (which is a fact).

I never knew that being liberal means supporting war crimes and corruption. They always say they want peace, are for human rights, that the weak should be taken care of. Seems to me that bombing citizens for oil and keep a currency under control is contradictory to that? So can anyone who supports Hillary explain to me why they support a corrupt war criminal? Thanks.

Paul Markham · 05-09-2016, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

Apparently liberal voters are pro war crimes and pro corruption. Since those two things describe Hillary Clinton (which is a fact).

I never knew that being liberal means supporting war crimes and corruption. They always say they want peace, are for human rights, that the weak should be taken care of. Seems to me that bombing citizens for oil and keep a currency under control is contradictory to that? So can anyone who supports Hillary explain to me why they support a corrupt war criminal? Thanks.

Trump is clearly pro-war. No debate needed on a man who will build huge armed forces and walk away from the table on negotiations. He has no options but to go to war or let others do as they please.

What's his record on corruption in business?

Rep v Dem on war? The two Bushes. Sadly America is crap at deciding where it should go to war. They only entered WW2 because of the Japanese. Korea was a disaster, Vietnam a shameful scandal, Cambodia, Bay of Pigs, Iraq, etc.

If they force you to pay to build all those weapons. They have to go to war to justify the costs.

05-08-2016, 05:05 PM	#1
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	How exactly does 'liberal' fit in with war crimes and corruption? Apparently liberal voters are pro war crimes and pro corruption. Since those two things describe Hillary Clinton (which is a fact). I never knew that being liberal means supporting war crimes and corruption. They always say they want peace, are for human rights, that the weak should be taken care of. Seems to me that bombing citizens for oil and keep a currency under control is contradictory to that? So can anyone who supports Hillary explain to me why they support a corrupt war criminal? Thanks.

05-08-2016, 05:30 PM	#2
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	war inc is too big to fail...the US economy is not in a good place and the outlook is not good either, unfortunately the global position of the US dollar and the exploitation of others play a vital role...the USA can not afford not to war...china and russia know this...trump pulling back US troops would make billions for russia and china in weapons sales and deals...you think pooty did not get some concessions from assad? racketeering is what the USA does...it depends on it and the ruling class make mucho $$$ from it and as I said: the USA can not afford to shut down war inc at this point in time... but I agree with the stuff you say about hillary its spot on __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

05-08-2016, 05:40 PM	#3
galleryseek Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 8,234	The phenomenon exists on the right as well. The right worships Reagan, (the right, a collective who's supposedly for smaller government), a president that grew the government by 2/3. There's a lot of contradictions on both sides, and ultimately that's indoctrination speaking, ushered by public education, directed by the state.

05-08-2016, 05:44 PM	#4
ITraffic Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,725	how can one vote for someone who is campaigning on policies which would be war crimes?