jon osoff: doesn't even live in the district he's running in?

[Joshua G]

why do you liberals keep shooting yourselves in the foot with such awful candidates?

first, you lose to a pussy grabbing hitler because your candidate was even uglier. She was too entitled to bother to campaign in the deplorable rust belt. Bye bye to a generation of liberal supreme courts.

now, you need a W in the worst way. & your candidate in Georgia doesnt even live in the district???

dumb libs.

[Joshua G]

how can you dumb libs run a city, a state or a country, when you cant even select qualified candidates?

there is supposed to be a swing back to democrats these next couple cycles. Its not gonna happen. you dumb libs are too dysfunctional. Too busy being offended by everybody & everything. whose leading the democrats? CNN? the protesters at evergreen college?

dumb libs.

[Joshua G]

realclearpolitics published a recent poll that puts osoff up. Same outfits that had hilary up too.

remember those polls, dumb libs? Hilary was a lock. remember, dumb libs?

so when liberal polls say the liberal will win, we all know what happens next. the pussy grabbing troll wins.

hahahaaaaaaa.

dumb libs.

[Axeman]

He was born and raised in the district, but does now live 5 miles outside of the district while his fiance completes Medical school at Emory. So not like he is "out of touch" with the district. But sure he can't vote for himself. There are many reasons I wouldn't vote for Osoff, but him living 5 miles outside of it, would be at the very bottom of the list.

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by Axeman

He was born and raised in the district, but does now live 5 miles outside of the district while his fiance completes Medical school at Emory. So not like he is "out of touch" with the district. But sure he can't vote for himself. There are many reasons I wouldn't vote for Osoff, but him living 5 miles outside of it, would be at the very bottom of the list.

maybe. but this is newt gingrich's district. AKA traditional values voters, not urban types who auto-vote the liberal ticket, blindly.

so he's running in the wrong district to not even be a resident in it.

[Joshua G]

if jon osoff wins, the liberal media will throw a huge party & talk about trump losing for the rest of the week.

& WHEN mandel wins, & she will...the liberal media will downplay it & drop the whole topic by mid morning. just like when a GOP congressman got shot by a hostile liberal. anything that does not fit the anti-trump resistance bullshit is ignored by the liberal media. NYTimes will report that spot the white house dog is under investigation for colluding with russia, just to deflect from the stink of yet another liberal loss.

dumb libs. you will never win another race outside dark blue states at this rate. not with a gaggle of angry hostile liberals fraudulently claiming to be "independent" & "objective" when they report the news.

dumb libs.

[tony286]

Im not voting for him but got to do better then that. He lives maybe 15 mins away. At least everything he says isnt a noun,a verb and Nancy Pelosi.

[bronco67]

Joshua G... get AIDS soon. Please.

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Joshua G... get AIDS soon. Please.

hey look its one of the hostile dumb libs whose rhetoric made a bernie bro shoot up a baseball field of GOP.

no surprise you engage in such toxic shit. idiot dumbfuck.

dont you have a play to watch with trump being murdered dumb lib???

[Joshua G]

hey dumb libs!

will you be blaming misogyny if the white male beats the woman? of course not.

but if the tables were opposite, like trump vs hilary? of course. its only racist or sexist when a GOP beats a liberal. not the other way around.

hahahahaaaaa, hypocrite dumb libs.

[Bladewire]

I thought people didn't want political threads why is JoshuaG making 6 anti liberal threads today?

My last Trump thread was 4 days ago.

[Bladewire]

[Joshua G]

each hour that passes. osoff sinks further & further.

its looking like a BLOWOUT WIN for Trump & the GOP. didnt realclearpolitics have osoff up by 2? another polling fail by fudged liberal polls. wont stop rochard from believing the next round of bullshit polls. they can be off by 10 points & he will keep on believing. like a lap dog.

nighty night dumb libs. you are on track to actually lose seats next cycle, which is a really hard thing to do.

at what point do you dumb libs look at your own hate rhetoric, your trump murder plays, your attempted murder of GOP congressmen, Hilary's slam dunk victory crashing down, endless lies & fairy tales from a hostile partisan media that pretends to be independent, & realize you are uglier than trump???

[Joshua G]

MSNBC - narrow lead...6 point is a narrow lead? LOL.

politico - slight edge? LOL.

credit the NYTimes for bothering to report actual numbers.

how did we get from osoff +2 to handel +6??? why does realclearpolitics keep publishing polls full of liberal fraud??? when will you dumb libs wake up from the endless bullshit of the press you read? everytime there is a vote, the polls are way off, always saying the liberal will win. then they lose. & lose. & lose.

dumb libs.

[Joshua G]

where are the GFY dumb libs tonight? watching rachel maddow spin up some bullshit how this was about local politics, not about trump? dont count on rachel to tell you the truth. liberal ugly is killing the left. & rachel is one of the biggest bullshit artists in the media.

dumb libs.

[kane]

It's looking like the Republican is going to win this one. If I were the Democrats I would be sad that they lost and that they spent a huge amount of money, but the result was still pretty good for them. That seat has been Republican since 1979. Since 2000 the Republican has won every election by at least 30 points. That this was even close should make Dems happy that they can make some inroads in 2018, although that is still a long way off and anything could happen.

BTW. RealClearPolitics showed three polls in the last few days before the election that showed them within a few points of each other or tied. Their final RCP average gave Handel +.2. They have had the race within the margin of error for several days.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by kane

It's looking like the Republican is going to win this one. If I were the Democrats I would be sad that they lost and that they spent a huge amount of money, but the result was still pretty good for them. That seat has been Republican since 1979. Since 2000 the Republican has won every election by at least 30 points. That this was even close should make Dems happy that they can make some inroads in 2018, although that is still a long way off and anything could happen.

BTW. RealClearPolitics showed three polls in the last few days before the election that showed them within a few points of each other or tied. Their final RCP average gave Handel +.2. They have had the race within the margin of error for several days.

It's so red that even Trump won there, even if slightly. This is where gerrymandering fucks the voter it's a +7 red redistricted area, which means without redistricting Dems would win there. The new supreme Court case on redistricting might change the cheating permanently.

The supreme Court has a chance to reign in gerrymandering

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by kane

BTW. RealClearPolitics showed three polls in the last few days before the election that showed them within a few points of each other or tied. Their final RCP average gave Handel +.2. They have had the race within the margin of error for several days.

5 points is not near the margin of error. accurate polling would be in range of the actual result not numerous points off. please do point out the RCP poll that had handel +5. somehow, their polls are always wrong, & to the left of reality. Gee why does this keep happening?

can someone lib-splain to RCP that polls are supposed to reflect reality not liberal wishful thinking?

[hottoddy]

Desperate for every election down to dogcatcher to be a referendum against Trump, the Democrats (mostly out-of-state) far outspent the Republicans ... and still lost.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...-election.html

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

It's so red that even Trump won there, even if slightly. This is where gerrymandering fucks the voter it's a +7 red redistricted area, which means without redistricting Dems would win there. The new supreme Court case on redistricting might change the cheating permanently.

The supreme Court has a chance to reign in gerrymandering

how can this dumb asshat possibly live in one of the most scenic areas of the USA, & spend all his time in life posting lies, hate, videos of handicapped people, & penis pics?

what a loser.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Joshua G

why do you liberals keep shooting yourselves in the foot with such awful candidates?

first, you lose to a pussy grabbing hitler because your candidate was even uglier. She was too entitled to bother to campaign in the deplorable rust belt. Bye bye to a generation of liberal supreme courts.

now, you need a W in the worst way. & your candidate in Georgia doesnt even live in the district???

dumb libs.

[beerptrol]

Lemmings will vote red even if it kills them

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by beerptrol

Lemmings will vote red even if it kills them

QfT

[kane]

Originally Posted by Joshua G

5 points is not near the margin of error. accurate polling would be in range of the actual result not numerous points off. please do point out the RCP poll that had handel +5. somehow, their polls are always wrong, & to the left of reality. Gee why does this keep happening?

can someone lib-splain to RCP that polls are supposed to reflect reality not liberal wishful thinking?

If you look at the list of polls RCP uses you will see one called Trafalgar that had her up by 2 points a couple of days ago. It has a margin of error 2.9 meaning her up by 4.9 is in the margin of error. The WSB poll done on the same day had it tied but had a 4.4 margin of error. The only poll that was done within the week of the election that was off was the Fox 5 poll which had Ossoff +1, but it also had a margin of error of 4.2 so they weren't off by a whole lot.

These polls did reflect reality which is that it was a very close race. The Republicans got a higher turnout than expected so they clearly did a better job of getting their voters out and to the polls.