Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2017, 08:17 AM   #1
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 27,661
NBER finds Seattle wage increase reduced earnings

This paper evaluates the wage, employment, and hours effects of the first and second phase-in of the Seattle Minimum Wage Ordinance, which raised the minimum wage from $9.47 to $11 per hour in 2015 and to $13 per hour in 2016. Using a variety of methods to analyze employment in all sectors paying below a specified real hourly rate, we conclude that the second wage increase to $13 reduced hours worked in low-wage jobs by around 9 percent, while hourly wages in such jobs increased by around 3 percent. Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees? earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016. Evidence attributes more modest effects to the first wage increase. We estimate an effect of zero when analyzing employment in the restaurant industry at all wage levels, comparable to many prior studies.

Minimum Wage Increases, Wages, and Low-Wage Employment: Evidence from Seattle
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 08:34 AM   #2
Steve Rupe
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
This paper evaluates the wage, employment, and hours effects of the first and second phase-in of the Seattle Minimum Wage Ordinance, which raised the minimum wage from $9.47 to $11 per hour in 2015 and to $13 per hour in 2016. Using a variety of methods to analyze employment in all sectors paying below a specified real hourly rate, we conclude that the second wage increase to $13 reduced hours worked in low-wage jobs by around 9 percent, while hourly wages in such jobs increased by around 3 percent. Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees? earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016. Evidence attributes more modest effects to the first wage increase. We estimate an effect of zero when analyzing employment in the restaurant industry at all wage levels, comparable to many prior studies.

Minimum Wage Increases, Wages, and Low-Wage Employment: Evidence from Seattle
If the article is true then it simply means that minimum wage workers are working less hours and making more per hours worked than ever before.
Steve Rupe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:19 AM   #3
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 27,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe View Post
If the article is true then it simply means that minimum wage workers are working less hours and making more per hours worked than ever before.
"Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees’ earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016."

It says right there it cut their "earnings" on average.

As a business owner if I only have x amount of dollars to spend on "help" that's all I have to spend no matter what the hourly is.
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:27 AM   #4
CoolMikey
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe View Post
If the article is true then it simply means that minimum wage workers are working less hours and making more per hours worked than ever before.
The goal wasn't to fuck business owners so minimum wage workers can have more time for leisure. The objective was to lift minimum wage workers out of poverty, a worthy goal, but clearly that goal was NOT accomplished.

So the whole plan is a complete failure, as both business owner and employee became worse off after the minimum wage increase.
__________________
CoolMikey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:40 AM   #5
Steve Rupe
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolMikey View Post
The goal wasn't to fuck business owners so minimum wage workers can have more time for leisure. The objective was to lift minimum wage workers out of poverty, a worthy goal, but clearly that goal was NOT accomplished.

So the whole plan is a complete failure, both parties (business owner and employee) became worse off after the minimum wage increase.
Historically raising the minimum wage has never been a failure other than on a temporary basis. To my knowledge there is not any reason to expect the present to be any different. The problem with studies about any subject is they can and often are manipulated to obtain the result that the sponsor of the study wants to obtain or based upon faulty information or conclusions.
Steve Rupe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:46 AM   #6
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolMikey View Post
The goal wasn't to fuck business owners so minimum wage workers can have more time for leisure.
You are I'll informed.

Minimum wage workers in expensive areas require more money as "minimum" wage to pay higher rent, gas, utilities & food costs, like where I live.
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:50 AM   #7
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
"Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees? earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016."

It says right there it cut their "earnings" on average.

As a business owner if I only have x amount of dollars to spend on "help" that's all I have to spend no matter what the hourly is.
this is where the issues start, lawmakers have no budgets, they just print more money
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 09:54 AM   #8
CoolMikey
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire View Post
You are I'll informed.

Minimum wage workers in expensive areas require more money as "minimum" wage to pay higher rent, gas, utilities & food costs, like where I live.
You may have missed the detail that after minimum wage increase:

"Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees’ earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016."

so minimum wage workers ended up with LESS money, so they certainly are not better off, business owner is not better off, and neither is the tax payer as that $125 reduction in earnings likely has to be covered by government assistance.

So like I said, it's a complete failure.
__________________
CoolMikey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 10:02 AM   #9
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Lower skilled jobs are being automated, robotized or eliminated perhaps?

To be expected ...
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 10:07 AM   #10
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolMikey View Post
You may have missed the detail that after minimum wage increase:

"Consequently, total payroll fell for such jobs, implying that the minimum wage ordinance lowered low-wage employees? earnings by an average of $125 per month in 2016."

so minimum wage workers ended up with LESS money, so they certainly are not better off, business owner is not better off, and neither is the tax payer as that $125 reduction in earnings likely has to be covered by government assistance.

So like I said, it's a complete failure.
Think with your own mind.

Companies raise wages to pay BETTER than minimum wage to be competative with those paying minimum wage.

We've been through this before in California you're spreading false propaganda.

Example: I have a store with 2 minimum wage employees ($5 an hour) and one manager ($6 an hour) working a total of 120 hours a week. Minimum wage goes up to $6 an hour. Instead of paying 3 employees minimum wage @ $6 an hour, I raise the wage of the manager to $7 an hour, taking it out of the minimum wage bracket. Instead of having 3 minimum wage employees, I now have 2, and a manager @ $7 an hour (above minimum wage).

See how that works? Use your mind.
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
wage, jobs, minimum, employment, increase, hourly, hour, $13, low-wage, ordinance, hours, seattle, reduced, effects, percent, earnings, $125, average, payroll, month, implying, lowered, employees?, fell, levels



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.