ALL of Clinton's emails were being CC'ed to a "foreign source" - GoFuckYourself.com

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 12:09 PM

Boom!!!!!

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 12:12 PM

Matt-ADX · 07-12-2018, 12:14 PM

This thread is useless

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Wait for it... wait for it....

This is fucking EXPLOSIVE.. Democrats were throwing a fit that was revealed. LOL

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

This thread is useless

It won't be...

RedFred · 07-12-2018, 12:30 PM

The Kool-Aid you drink must have some strong psychedelic qualities.

PR_Glen · 07-12-2018, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It won't be...

who needs proof when you can just have conjecture and wishes right?

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 12:34 PM

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

who needs proof when you can just have conjecture and wishes right?

No conjecture.. It was just revealed in the Strzok hearing.. Strzok completely ignored it.

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 12:36 PM

Matt-ADX · 07-12-2018, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

who needs proof when you can just have conjecture and wishes right?

Why are you taking shots at Bladwire?

Matt-ADX · 07-12-2018, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

No conjecture.. It was just revealed in the Strzok hearing.. Strzok completely ignored it.

Didn't hear that, but boy oh boy has this been must see TV. Thoroughly entertaining.

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 12:44 PM

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

Didn't hear that, but boy oh boy has this been must see TV. Thoroughly entertaining.

Yep, it will make it's rounds no doubt... He was being asked about the "anomaly" on Clinton's server.. That anomaly was that all mails were being sent to a foreign source. They didn't specify whether it was a hack or what but either way.... Dems went ape shit when it was being discussed.

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 12:58 PM

8pt-buck · 07-12-2018, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Wait for it... wait for it....

It appears the confirmed bisexual racist hate troll is expecting another budging crotch picture from Rochard?

Why does is this current non-industry failed webcam schmuck insist on posting in every single political thread. His / her all day abundant time spent daily on GFY is testimony to his non-industry status.

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 01:01 PM

8pt-buck · 07-12-2018, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Yep, it will make it's rounds no doubt... He was being asked about the "anomaly" on Clinton's server.. That anomaly was that all mails were being sent to a foreign source. They didn't specify whether it was a hack or what but either way.... Dems went ape shit when it was being discussed.

Crooked, crooked Hillary.
Not only that, The Clinton Foundation is the largest Organized Crime racket in the world. They're currently seeking new members and donors. Curious if they'll be treated to Hillary tripping, falling and being carried away for treatment?

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 01:15 PM

RedFred · 07-12-2018, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8pt-buck

It appears the confirmed bisexual racist hate troll is expecting another budging crotch picture from Rochard?

You made it clear you have a hatred for porn stars by calling them sluts, and now bisexuals. Has GFY been infiltrated by the fucking Church Lady?

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 01:20 PM

no, they weren't.

Bladewire · 07-12-2018, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred

You made it clear you have a hatred for porn stars by calling them sluts, and now bisexuals. Has GFY been infiltrated by the fucking Church Lady?

I don't see his stuff unless someone not blocked quotes it. Too funny

This thread is about Hillary Clinton and he's thinking about me sexually and bulging crotch pics

2MuchMark · 07-12-2018, 01:23 PM

but the bengazz- oh nevermind.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

no, they weren't.

According to someone that wasn't paid by the DNC who actually analyzed the server they were... I've been on the lake

I'm sure there's a clip up by now.

The Porn Nerd · 07-12-2018, 03:20 PM

Here's the thing: why do so many on an Adult Industry (porn) board choose to endlessly/uselessly discuss Hillary/Trump instead of shooting, editing or watching porn?

I don't want to hang out with any of you lame asses. LOL

AmeliaG · 07-12-2018, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Here's the thing: why do so many on an Adult Industry (porn) board choose to endlessly/uselessly discuss Hillary/Trump instead of shooting, editing or watching porn?

I don't want to hang out with any of you lame asses. LOL

You've got my vote, Porn Nerd!

What you describe is why I almost never come here any more.

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Here's the thing: why do so many on an Adult Industry (porn) board choose to endlessly/uselessly discuss Hillary/Trump instead of shooting, editing or watching porn?

I don't want to hang out with any of you lame asses. LOL

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

You've got my vote, Porn Nerd!

What you describe is why I almost never come here any more.

yet here you two are.
weird.

Rochard · 07-12-2018, 04:15 PM

I happened to catch this line of questioning while I was eating lunch today. It's fucking disgusting.

The accusation was that there was no evidence of a crime against Hillary Clinton while secretly every email was being copied to a third party outside of the United States. My jaw dropped when I heard this - really, we are still bitching about the Hillary emails?

I demand that this be investigated immediately. If there is any truth to this, this information to should be handed out to the public. If this is false, the person who made the accusation should be removed from office immediately. This was a Congressional hearing, not a school yard. You know this is pure bullshit - if there was any truth to this the Republicans would have released this information years ago.

This entire hearing was nothing more than an attempt to smear the FBI and FBI agents running the investigation into the President. There is zero evidence of bias. He is an FBI agent; He has the right have an opinion AND a right to state his opinion in private. There is nothing wrong with that at all. He said shit about Hillary Clinton too.

This is insane. They are holding hearings into a an investigation before the investigation has concluded. They have zero proof of any wrong doing and their only intention is to smear the campaign. The truth no longer matters.

It's just like their investigations into Hillary Clinton. A dozen investigations, no charges. Their ONLY intention was to smear a political candidate. The truth isn't important to them.

directfiesta · 07-12-2018, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Please .... NO !!!!

Would like to have a south neighboor that is run by normal sain person ...

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I happened to catch this line of questioning while I was eating lunch today. It's fucking disgusting.

The accusation was that there was no evidence of a crime against Hillary Clinton while secretly every email was being copied to a third party outside of the United States. My jaw dropped when I heard this - really, we are still bitching about the Hillary emails?

I demand that this be investigated immediately. If there is any truth to this, this information to should be handed out to the public. If this is false, the person who made the accusation should be removed from office immediately. This was a Congressional hearing, not a school yard. You know this is pure bullshit - if there was any truth to this the Republicans would have released this information years ago.

This entire hearing was nothing more than an attempt to smear the FBI and FBI agents running the investigation into the President. There is zero evidence of bias. He is an FBI agent; He has the right have an opinion AND a right to state his opinion in private. There is nothing wrong with that at all. He said shit about Hillary Clinton too.

This is insane. They are holding hearings into a an investigation before the investigation has concluded. They have zero proof of any wrong doing and their only intention is to smear the campaign. The truth no longer matters.

It's just like their investigations into Hillary Clinton. A dozen investigations, no charges. Their ONLY intention was to smear a political candidate. The truth isn't important to them.

The truth isn't important to you obviously.... This shit is just now coming out because it was BURIED... Strzok ignored the information...... If you were watching he told you he did.. And the Dems flipped the fuck out because it was brought up.. That's what this is all about...... Instead of following that information they instead went with the DNC paid crowdstrike claims of "Russia done it" to distract from Hillary's email server.. It was stated the "foreign source" WAS NOT RUSSIA... So what country was it? Was it a hack? Or was it PAID access????

What if Trump's emails were being CC'ed to a foreign entity?

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 04:33 PM

So you're expecting us to believe all 50000+ emails were cc'ed to Russia?

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

So you're expecting us to believe all 50000+ emails were cc'ed to Russia?

Not Russia, that was stated.... Yes, apparently EVERY email was being cc'ed to a foreign entity..

This shit should not be surprising to ANYONE in the tech industry.... She was doing all business on a fucking unsecured server.....

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Not Russia, that was stated.... Yes, apparently EVERY email was being cc'ed to a foreign entity..

This shit should not be surprising to ANYONE in the tech industry.... She was doing all business on a fucking unsecured server.....

You'll have to forgive me for not being able to follow your coocoo conspiracy theories that lead nowhere. where was it stated "not Russia"? Last you stated to me was there "should be a clip" as if that's proof.

RedFred · 07-12-2018, 04:47 PM

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

You'll have to forgive me for not being able to follow your coocoo conspiracy theories that lead nowhere. where was it stated "not Russia"? Last you stated to me was there "should be a clip" as if that's proof.

You'll have to watch yourself or wait . Still watching and behind myself. BTW there were hundreds of thousands of emails on Weiners laptop....

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 04:51 PM

Actually, I'm fine knowing it's not true.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Actually, I'm fine knowing it's not true.

And you know this how? Did Hillary allow you to analyze the server?

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

And you know this how? Did Hillary allow you to analyze the server?

Because you haven't proven me wrong.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Because you haven't proven me wrong.

Your information is that there were only 50,000 emails. It's now fact that hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails were found on Weiner's laptop. Everything since even before she became SOS. Including blackberry text messages. Strzok and everyone else at the FBI completely ignored ALL that..

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 05:21 PM

that makes your assumption even more ludicrous.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that makes your assumption even more ludicrous.

What assumption? It's been stated about 50 times today that there were in fact hundreds of thousands of Clinton's emails on his laptop and not one person including Strzok denied that.

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 05:26 PM

read your own thread topic if you want to know what your own assumption is.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

read your own thread topic if you want to know what your own assumption is.

You're arguing with me about something you claim to know so much about when you aren't even watching the testimony.... Which I still am btw..

Rochard of all people confirmed my post topic.....

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 05:36 PM

you think I'm arguing with you?

I was initially open to what you were exclaiming and inquired about it.

richard backing you up on something only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about.

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

you think I'm arguing with you?

I was initially open to what you were exclaiming and inquired about it.

richard backing you up on something only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about.

Your first response is "No, they weren't"

How is that "open?"

You sound like Strzok...

Rochard · 07-12-2018, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

You'll have to forgive me for not being able to follow your coocoo conspiracy theories that lead nowhere. where was it stated "not Russia"? Last you stated to me was there "should be a clip" as if that's proof.

During the hearing it was stated the emails were "being copied to a country that is not Russia" which is a bit vague. If any of this was true, why wouldn't he disclose which country or who the emails were being copied to?

onwebcam · 07-12-2018, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

During the hearing it was stated the emails were "being copied to a country that is not Russia" which is a bit vague. If any of this was true, why wouldn't he disclose which country or who the emails were being copied to?

Because he wanted to insert the fact but not finger the likely "ally" foreign entity? Strzok didn't deny the actual fact.. He argued his actions on them. Or at least he tried but Dems went all crazy in interruptions.

Since it was brought out.. It means it will eventually be revealed... Can't put the genie back in the bottle.

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Your first response is "No, they weren't"

How is that "open?"

You sound like Strzok...

why shouldn't I be skeptical of your claims? you've not been right one single time. skepticism doesn't preclude being open to facts.

dyna mo · 07-12-2018, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

During the hearing it was stated the emails were "being copied to a country that is not Russia" which is a bit vague. If any of this was true, why wouldn't he disclose which country or who the emails were being copied to?

thanks, i can't sit through nonsensical congressional inquiries.

crockett · 07-12-2018, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Boom!!!!!

There appears to be no limit to your gullibility..

07-12-2018, 12:09 PM	#1
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,679	ALL of Clinton's emails were being CC'ed to a "foreign source" Boom!!!!! __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

07-12-2018, 12:36 PM	#10
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	__________________ Skype: CallTomNow

07-12-2018, 12:44 PM	#13
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	__________________ Skype: CallTomNow

07-12-2018, 01:01 PM	#17
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	__________________ Skype: CallTomNow

07-12-2018, 01:15 PM	#19
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	__________________ Skype: CallTomNow

07-12-2018, 12:12 PM	#2
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229

07-12-2018, 12:14 PM	#3
Matt-ADX Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Posts: 1,497	This thread is useless

07-12-2018, 12:30 PM	#6
RedFred Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9,782	The Kool-Aid you drink must have some strong psychedelic qualities.

07-12-2018, 12:34 PM	#8
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229

07-12-2018, 12:58 PM	#15
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229

07-12-2018, 01:20 PM	#21
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	no, they weren't.

07-12-2018, 01:23 PM	#23
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,481	but the bengazz- oh nevermind. __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net

07-12-2018, 03:20 PM	#25
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,635	Here's the thing: why do so many on an Adult Industry (porn) board choose to endlessly/uselessly discuss Hillary/Trump instead of shooting, editing or watching porn? I don't want to hang out with any of you lame asses. LOL __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

07-12-2018, 04:15 PM	#28
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,293	I happened to catch this line of questioning while I was eating lunch today. It's fucking disgusting. The accusation was that there was no evidence of a crime against Hillary Clinton while secretly every email was being copied to a third party outside of the United States. My jaw dropped when I heard this - really, we are still bitching about the Hillary emails? I demand that this be investigated immediately. If there is any truth to this, this information to should be handed out to the public. If this is false, the person who made the accusation should be removed from office immediately. This was a Congressional hearing, not a school yard. You know this is pure bullshit - if there was any truth to this the Republicans would have released this information years ago. This entire hearing was nothing more than an attempt to smear the FBI and FBI agents running the investigation into the President. There is zero evidence of bias. He is an FBI agent; He has the right have an opinion AND a right to state his opinion in private. There is nothing wrong with that at all. He said shit about Hillary Clinton too. This is insane. They are holding hearings into a an investigation before the investigation has concluded. They have zero proof of any wrong doing and their only intention is to smear the campaign. The truth no longer matters. It's just like their investigations into Hillary Clinton. A dozen investigations, no charges. Their ONLY intention was to smear a political candidate. The truth isn't important to them. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

07-12-2018, 04:33 PM	#31
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	So you're expecting us to believe all 50000+ emails were cc'ed to Russia?

07-12-2018, 04:47 PM	#34
RedFred Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9,782

07-12-2018, 04:51 PM	#36
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	Actually, I'm fine knowing it's not true.

07-12-2018, 05:21 PM	#40
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	that makes your assumption even more ludicrous.

07-12-2018, 05:26 PM	#42
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	read your own thread topic if you want to know what your own assumption is.

07-12-2018, 05:36 PM	#44
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	you think I'm arguing with you? I was initially open to what you were exclaiming and inquired about it. richard backing you up on something only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about.