Republicans are such whiny bitches..

[crockett]

“Let me tell you my Democratic friends,” Graham said, “if this is the new norm, you better watch out for your nominees.” Ghram


Um hello Ghram do you remember your role in denial of Obama's nomination and actually stealing the SC nomination from him..

Its almost as funny as watching the Turtle McDumbass complain..


Such sore losers Republicans are.. pretty much anyone who still calls themselves a Republican is a scumbag.. All the decent ones walked away after Trump..

[kane]

The funny thing is they started this shit with the SCOTUS nominees by stealing one of Obama's lol.

[tony286]

Its all fucking theater.

[Rochard]

Let me see if I understand this correctly.... Multiple women coming forward and accusing someone of sexual assault is bad, but asking President Clinton if he got a blow job in the Oval Office for no reason is perfectly acceptable.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Let me see if I understand this correctly.... Multiple women coming forward and accusing someone of sexual assault is bad, but asking President Clinton if he got a blow job in the Oval Office for no reason is perfectly acceptable.

I've never met a Republican who wasnt a hypocrite..

[crockett]

Originally Posted by tony286

Its all fucking theater.

It would be theater if they weren't fucking shit up...

[dyna mo]

This is great news guys! A republican spectacle broadcast on all networks!

[Acepimp]

That's right, guilty until proven innocent (if you're a Republican)

I'm an independent but most of what Crockette is saying is BS.

Crockett, presidents can make nominations in their last year but historically they're almost always rejected. It's nothing new and it's not just one sided

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

That's right, guilty until proven innocent

you mean like all 3 accusers or?

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crockett

Such sore losers Republicans are..

So true

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

That's right, guilty until proven innocent (if you're a Republican)

No, it's innocent until proven guilty. However, the Republicans are refusing to so much as have an investigation into accusations. The Republicans are also saying the FBI cannot have an investigation into this when we know for a fact they can; In fact, it's routine. Even worse, just moments ago they said they did investigate this - by having a single six sentence statement from one witness which wasn't made under oath, and wasn't even signed by the witness.

They are trying to ram this through. There is no reason not to have an investigation.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

That's right, guilty until proven innocent (if you're a Republican)

I'm an independent but most of what Crockette is saying is BS.

Crockett, presidents can make nominations in their last year but historically they're almost always rejected. It's nothing new and it's not just one sided

You've never once held that opinion about Hillary.. in fact even when she was found innocent of any wrong doing you helped promote conspiracies about her..

Everyone of you right wing morons claims he's independent... you lie..

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Rochard

No, it's innocent until proven guilty.

Brett Kavanaugh's defense was "It wasn't written in my calendar so I didn't do it"

Crying over his calendar was classic

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Brett Kavanaugh's defense was "It wasn't written in my calendar so I didn't do it"

Crying over his calendar was classic

You know what was very telling of his guilt? The fact that he hadn't watched Ford's testimony. If you were innocent of this accusation, wouldn't you want to listen to what the accuser had to say to figure out how she mixed you up with someone else?

If he had done the assault, he'd most likely not want to listen. Let's say that from that point in his life onward, he's been a stellar human being and treats women with respect. It would be painful to listen to a woman give tearful testimony about how he sexually assaulted her.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by bronco67

You know what was very telling of his guilt? The fact that he hadn't watched Ford's testimony. If you were innocent of this accusation, wouldn't you want to listen to what the accuser had to say to figure out how she mixed you up with someone else?

He knew he did it

He didn't want to watch her testimony because he did it and knew what she was going to say.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

You've never once held that opinion about Hillary.. in fact even when she was found innocent of any wrong doing you helped promote conspiracies about her..

Everyone of you right wing morons claims he's independent... you lie..

She tried to delete/BleachBit 30,000+ emails that had already been subpoenaed by Congress, then had her minions smash devices with a hammer. That is a crime. She mishandled classified material. That is a crime. james Comey changed the finding from gross negligence (a crime) to "extreme carelessness."

But keep ignoring the coverup and cheerleading for a known criminal and liar

PS- I was an Obama and Sanders voter. #WalkAway

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by bronco67

You know what was very telling of his guilt? The fact that he hadn't watched Ford's testimony. If you were innocent of this accusation, wouldn't you want to listen to what the accuser had to say to figure out how she mixed you up with someone else?

If he had done the assault, he'd most likely not want to listen. Let's say that from that point in his life onward, he's been a stellar human being and treats women with respect. It would be painful to listen to a woman give tearful testimony about how he sexually assaulted her.

I think he's guilty just because he said "I wasn't at THAT party" when she hasn't told anyone what party it was.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I think he's guilty just because he said "I wasn't at THAT party" when she hasn't told anyone what party it was.

He means any of the parties where she was in attendence

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I think he's guilty just because he said "I wasn't at THAT party" when she hasn't told anyone what party it was.

Great point

He also drank for 4 years while underage, the drinking age was changed from 18 to 21 at the time.

I'm pretty sure all of us have drank underage but he refuses to admit it which really shows his lack of honor and respect for the truth and for the confirmation process.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Great point

He also drank for 4 years while underage, the drinking age was changed from 18 to 21 at the time.

I'm pretty sure all of us have drink underage but he refuses to admit it which really shows his lock of Honor and respect for the truth of the confirmation process.

^^ None of that is true. He openly admitted to drinking a lot of beer

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Great point

He also drank for 4 years while underage, the drinking age was changed from 18 to 21 at the time.

I'm pretty sure all of us have drank underage but he refuses to admit it which really shows his lack of honor and respect for the truth and for the confirmation process.

We all did certain things during our youth. It's a time where rules and laws are not something that interest kids.... ALL of us drank under age. I didn't drink much in high school, but I did. I am sure nearly all of us have smoked pot too. (Ironically, I have NEVER smoked pot.)

Looking back at my past... I remember some parties, but not many details. I surely don't recall pinning any girl down and groping her against her will. But here is the thing - that person that did this doesn't remember it because it wasn't a big deal, but the person it happened to does remember it because it was a HUGE deal to them.

There are some things you can say "Oh, I was a kid then". But not sexually assaulting someone.

[crockett]

Another fine quote from Lindsey...



Lindsey Graham is mad and maddening. “What you want to do is destroy this guy’s life, hold this seat open, and hope you win in 2020,” the senator shouted at the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee on Thursday, when it was nominally his turn to question Brett Kavanaugh. “Boy, y’all want power,” he added. “I hope to God you never get it.”



Its almost like he knows a thing or two about that playbook.. Its totally not like he took part in the samething or anything.. oh no he's totally innocent.. In fact he is likely pissed that his little Republican party is having to suck up to the same shit they pulled..

Cant wait till the mid terms when he gets shoveled shit each and everyday..

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Rochard

We all did certain things during our youth. It's a time where rules and laws are not something that interest kids.... ALL of us drank under age. I didn't drink much in high school, but I did. I am sure nearly all of us have smoked pot too. (Ironically, I have NEVER smoked pot.)

Looking back at my past... I remember some parties, but not many details. I surely don't recall pinning any girl down and groping her against her will. But here is the thing - that person that did this doesn't remember it because it wasn't a big deal, but the person it happened to does remember it because it was a HUGE deal to them.

There are some things you can say "Oh, I was a kid then". But not sexually assaulting someone.

You are not talking about "normal" teenage boys here.. They were privileged rich kid's at a private school.. They were little Trump's in the making with entitlement issues..

[Rochard]

Republicans are great.

A Republican friend of mine hit me up just now and said "Democrats need to clean their house" and he demanded an Investigation into someone named Keith Ellison. Some quick research tells me Keith Ellison is a Democrat, and some woman has accused him of crimes. Keith Ellison himself is demanding an investigation to clear his name.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...-monahan-abuse

Do you see the difference?

Democrat is accused of a crime, and wants an investigation to clear his name. Republican is accused of sexually assaulting six women, and Congress wants refuses to investigate.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Republicans are great.

A Republican friend of mine hit me up just now and said "Democrats need to clean their house" and he demanded an Investigation into someone named Keith Ellison. Some quick research tells me Keith Ellison is a Democrat, and some woman has accused him of crimes. Keith Ellison himself is demanding an investigation to clear his name.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...-monahan-abuse

Do you see the difference?

Democrat is accused of a crime, and wants an investigation to clear his name. Republican is accused of sexually assaulting six women, and Congress wants refuses to investigate.

He's the #2 guy at the DNC. The difference is there is actual evidence, police reports, 911 calls, basically indisputable proof. Judge K has already passed FBI investigations 6 times, and there's no way to do an investigation on this- the woman has no details and her witnesses say it didn't happen

[TheSquealer]

great commentary from the uber emotional, unhinged idiots who have gone so far off the rails and departed so radically from reality and care more about virtue signaling than facts, that they think this is a racist symbol... because a 14 yr old on 4chan.org told them it was.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

you mean like all 3 accusers or?

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by baddog

They are all being tried in this court of public opinion. They should all be innocent until proven guilty.

[Martin]

Man you're a fuckin FAGG Cockett..

[dyna mo]

Our choice of Canadians has boiled down to Martin vs Mark prince..

[xKingx]

Party on, Wayne

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Rochard

We all did certain things during our youth. It's a time where rules and laws are not something that interest kids.... ALL of us drank under age. I didn't drink much in high school, but I did. I am sure nearly all of us have smoked pot too. (Ironically, I have NEVER smoked pot.)

Looking back at my past... I remember some parties, but not many details. I surely don't recall pinning any girl down and groping her against her will. But here is the thing - that person that did this doesn't remember it because it wasn't a big deal, but the person it happened to does remember it because it was a HUGE deal to them.

There are some things you can say "Oh, I was a kid then". But not sexually assaulting someone.

and also, that kind of thing disqualifies a person from being a Supreme Court Justice. It's a look into his character. Most revered, honored men walking around in the world didn't get there by being the kind of person who rapes women. Even if he did no more rapes or attempted rapes from that point up until now, it still disqualifies him.

You know a woman didn't say Neil Gorsuch tried to raped her? It's because he didn't try to rape anyone. If you're not being rapey, you won't get accused of it.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

They are all being tried in this court of public opinion. They should all be innocent until proven guilty.

Nice troll attempt.

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Our choice of Canadians has boiled down to Martin vs Mark prince..

Originally Posted by xKingx

Party on, Wayne

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by bronco67

and also, that kind of thing disqualifies a person from being a Supreme Court Justice. It's a look into his character. Most revered, honored men walking around in the world didn't get there by being the kind of person who rapes women. Even if he did no more rapes or attempted rapes from that point up until now, it still disqualifies him.

You know a woman didn't say Neil Gorsuch tried to raped her? It's because he didn't try to rape anyone. If you're not being rapey, you won't get accused of it.

This is another argument Republicans have that crack me up. Someone told me today it's the "Trump Haters" who are trying to prevent this nomination. No, not at all. If that was the case we would have stopped the other nomination.

[Rochard]

The Republicans are aware they can impeach someone from the Supreme Court, RIGHT?

[GAMEFINEST]

A new low indeed

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by baddog

Nice troll attempt.

[PornDiscounts-V]

Reps = snowflakes

Most unstable people at my poker games. No Democrats ever wanted to box somebody over someone talking smack about Obama. But one gripe about a stupid tweet and suddenly every Republican is an mma fighter, ready to make heads roll.

No, no, I'm tired of this shit!

What shit, bro?

You guys always talking shit about our president. Your president.

Buddy, don't you remember slamming Obama every week? Telling us how he's a monkey and is from Africa, not America? You don't remember any of the shit you said?

This is way different! We didn't talk shit like you guys do.


... And around and around it goes. Snowflakes telling everyone else they are snowflakes and retarded and it's time to, cash me outside!

Idiots!

End rant.

[Matt 26z]

Originally Posted by Rochard

However, the Republicans are refusing to so much as have an investigation into accusations.

All the accuser has to do is go to the local police where this happened and file a report. They will then investigate it.

Why hasn't she done that yet?

[Martin]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Our choice of Canadians has boiled down to Martin vs Mark prince..

You can have the weird frenchy.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Martin

You can have the weird frenchy.

He's not a likeable guy. At least you have your own opinion.