If Republicans ignore our laws and standards

[crockett]

Is it ok to treat them like criminals and start shooting them? We are a nation of law and order, if those laws are ignored by a few in power is it then acceptable for citizens to also ignore law and order to deal with corruption and threat to democracy?

Its always Republican nutters who use threat of violence with their little chants like the NRA's "from my cold dead hands" and Sarah Palins notorious cross hairs on elected officials faces..or Trump telling a crowd of people that a heckler should be beaten..

The right wing has a long history of vailed threats of use of violence as a scare tactic.

Is it time sane and rational people start forecably removing these tryants from power?


I know for myself if Republicans confirm this guy after all the shit he's been accused of with no investigation, then it means they dont represent the people of this nation nor our Constitutional Republic

At that point they are clearly a domestic enemy of the people and need to be dealt with.. Is this SC nomination the deal breaker on what becomes required to start forecably removing them from power?

There has to be a line in the sand..I think we are long past the point of checks and balances dealing with their corruption. Sooner or later the people will have to take a stand or tryants becomes the new normal.. What should the line in the sand be if not absolute corruption?

[Acepimp]

^^ Another dumb Crockette thread inciting violence.






Suggestion: Get a clue

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ Another dumb Crockette thread inciting violence.






Suggestion: Get a clue

It didnt seem to bother you when onwebcam said the accusers should be drug into the streets and beaten..

Why the double standard asspimple?

[tony286]

Originally Posted by crockett

It didnt seem to bother you when onwebcam said the accusers should be drug into the streets and beaten..

Why the double standard asspimple?

They are party of double standards. lol

[Martin]

Yes great idea! Start shooting at the people who own all the guns. Please do. Thin the lefty loonie club out a little..

[onwebcam]

Please do

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Please do

So you think violence is the answer?

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Martin

Yes great idea! Start shooting at the people who own all the guns. Please do. Thin the lefty loonie club out a little..

You're reallly dumb if you think just Conservatives own guns..but your a Canadian hillbilly anyway..

[dyna mo]

I abhor violence. and reject it as a solution.

Originally Posted by Martin

Yes great idea! Start shooting at the people who own all the guns. Please do. Thin the lefty loonie club out a little..

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

It didnt seem to bother you when onwebcam said the accusers should be drug into the streets and beaten..

Why the double standard asspimple?

I didn't see his quote, but anyone who is *falsely* accusing should be charged with a crime.

Why didn't Feinstein ask about it during the recent confirmation hearings? No one brought it up when they had the chance. Waiting til the last minute makes it seem like an obvious delay tactic

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

So you think violence is the answer?

Go with your gut

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I abhor violence. and reject it as a solution.

Threat of violence is called diplomacy and has been for 1000s of years.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Go with your gut

My gut tells me you are 350lbs of fat sitting in a worn out lazy boy with cigarette stains around it on the floor of your single wide trailer..

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

Threat of violence is called diplomacy and has been for 1000s of years.

is that a Trump quote?

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

is that a Trump quote?

No, it's in the history books..

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

No, it's in the history books..

is that a trump quote too?

yes, plenty of violence in history. unfortunately, you assume that means it is the best way and worse, you think it's the right way.

[Phoenix]

lol calling for death squads a little too soon i think

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

is that a trump quote too?

yes, plenty of violence in history. unfortunately, you assume that means it is the best way and worse, you think it's the right way.

I never said it's the best way or the right way, only that it's a way that's been used for thousands of years.. because it works..

Clearly upvoting and hitting like on articles talking about corruption is doing nothing. Voting has done nothing.. perhaps it's time to use a well tested method with a proven track record..

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

I never said it's the best way or the right way, only that it's a way that's been used for thousands of years.. because it works..

Clearly upvoting and hitting like on articles talking about corruption is doing nothing. Voting has done nothing.. perhaps it's time to use a well tested method..

i disagree amigo. 100% disagree. violence won't solve things. ever. besides, as Martin points out, while dems have a shit ton of guns, it does seem the real gun nutters are conservatives. it won't necessarily end in your favor.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

My gut tells me you are 350lbs of fat sitting in a worn out lazy boy with cigarette stains around it on the floor of your single wide trailer..

180lbs sitting in my 12000+sf building waiting on you to man up, shoot first, ask questions later..

[dyna mo]

jeez guys, let's all chillax please.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

lol calling for death squads a little too soon i think

When is soon enough? Imagine if someone stopped Hitler and the Nazi party.. or Pol Pot, or Stalin early on..or modern examples of
Erdoğan, Duterte or Chávez? Imagine if the people of those countries stood up when things were going obviously out of order and removed the corrupt leaders before they started destroying their countries..

So again when is soon enough? You think because its America it can't happen here? You think the Philippines thought Duterte was going to kill thousands 10 years ago? Do you think Russians thought when the USSR collapsed and they voted for democracy that they'd end up with a dictatorship?

Again when is soon enough? The longer you wait, the harder it becomes to win because it's now a new normal..

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it does seem the real gun nutters are conservatives.

Yes, that's why nearly all mass shooters are Democrats. When was the last time a Republican shot up a softball field full of Democrats?

[dyna mo]

let's let the special investigation do its job first of all.

come on.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

180lbs sitting in my 12000+sf building waiting on you to man up, shoot first, ask questions later..

Why are you inciting violence? I'm having a discussion about when is violent action appropriate and all you can do is rush to wanting to shoot people.. You really are sick in the head..

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

let's let the special investigation do its job first of all.

come on.

What special investigation? Do you mean Mueller? The one based entirely on a fraud?

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

let's let the special investigation do its job first of all.

come on.

Any convictions of Trump will end up in the SC . If the SC is stacked, then where is justice?

The point I make is law and order only works if we have checks and balances. Republicans are actively removing the checks and balances while people upvote and hit like buttons on social media about their outrage.

When checks and balances no longer work, the onlything left us threat of violence.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Yes, that's why nearly all mass shooters are Democrats. When was the last time a Republican shot up a softball field full of Democrats?

your research skills suck.


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/de...shooters-list/

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

Why are you inciting violence? I'm having a discussion about when is violent action appropriate and all you can do is rush to wanting to shoot people.. You really are sick in the head..

I'm not the one who started a thread about shooting people up

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

What special investigation? Do you mean Mueller? The one based entirely on a fraud?

correct, the one based on trump fraudulently winning the election with ruski help.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

your research skills suck.


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/de...shooters-list/

LOL @ snopes

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

Any convictions of Trump will end up in the SC . If the SC is stacked, then where is justice?

that's a huge risk, I agree. And if kavanaugh makes it, he's going to be even more pissed off than Thomas. I'm not sure what to do about that, if anything can even be done. I have ruled out violence though. I know the halls of Justice and such in DC yesterday were packed with demonstrators against kavanaugh.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

LOL @ snopes

i forgot you prefer "wait for it" evidence.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

I'm not the one who started a thread about shooting people up

Yet here you are wanting people shot..

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that's a huge risk, I agree. And if kavanaugh makes it, he's going to be even more pissed off than Thomas. I'm not sure what to do about that, if anything can even be done. I have ruled out violence though. I know the halls of Justice and such in DC yesterday were packed with demonstrators against kavanaugh.

There have been demonstrations for 2 years.. Yet Republicans still push forward with their corruption.

Peaceful demonstrations and protests only work if the representatives care or have something to lose. Clearly they dont care or think they have anything to lose which means the demonstrations or worthless.

This means either massive protest like occupy wall street which ended with no success or the tried and tested threat of force . Aka Diplomacy..

Example, people in Russia protest Putin all the time but he is never at risk of being removed from power. Is that what we want in the US because it sure seems like what Republicans want..

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

There have been demonstrations for 2 years.. Yet Republicans still push forward with their corruption.

Peaceful demonstrations and protests only work if the representatives care or have something to lose. Clearly they dont care or think they have anything to lose which means the demonstrations or worthless.

This means either massive protest like occupy wall street which ended with no success or the tried and tested threat of force . Aka Diplomacy..

well, there's a moral reckoning moment that a couple female republican senators will be having to make if it gets to the full senate. Collins and the other one. but now with the 1 week delay, what's trump going to do? not order an FBI investigation? for a week? shit.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

well, there's a moral reckoning moment that a couple female republican senators will be having to make if it gets to the full senate. Collins and the other one. but now with the 1 week delay, what's trump going to do? not order an FBI investigation? for a week? shit.

I dont think you realize. They are pushing the vote through today to have the Senate floor vote.



This is not going to be a FBI investigation or anymore hearings.

Clearly protest, public opinion, rule of law mean nothing to Republicans. They do whatever they want as if they believe their are tryants

I'm not ok with that and clearly protest is not working .



Washington (CNN) — BREAKING: The Senate Judiciary Committee has voted 11-10 along party lines to advance the nomination of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh to the Senate floor.
After tense negotiations behind the scenes, Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona, a GOP swing vote, announced he would support moving forward with the understanding of an investigation into allegations against Kavanaugh.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

I dont think you realize. They are pushing the vote through today..

This is not going to be a FBI investigation or anymore hearings.

Clearly protest, public opinion, rule of law mean nothing to Republicans. They di whatever they want as if they believe their are tryants

I'm not ok with that and clearly protest is not working .

flake is currently in the way of that is my understanding.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

flake is currently in the way of that is my understanding.

Flake is what is name is. He's a flake.. hes on and off at the drop of a hat.. He stated that he will support it and he's said he wont. Hes like Trump.. he says whatever the people in the room at that time want to hear.

He doesn't have balls enough to be the only no voice. No means yes to Republicans..

They already passed the vote 11-10 to hold the confirmation vote.

[dyna mo]

got it...

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crockett

Why are you inciting violence? I'm having a discussion about when is violent action appropriate and all you can do is rush to wanting to shoot people.. You really are sick in the head..

He's the conspiracy guy a clear sign of mental illness is thinking you have special info and because it's from a secret Source it must be correct. And when hes wrong time and time again, he denies it and fills the space with s new conspiracy. He's mentally ill & filled with hate.

Don't forget his other nic said that he was a wealthy businessman with multiple fully paid properties no debts and no taxes and about to retire early

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by crockett

Is it ok to treat them like criminals and start shooting them? We are a nation of law and order, if those laws are ignored by a few in power is it then acceptable for citizens to also ignore law and order to deal with corruption and threat to democracy?

Its always Republican nutters who use threat of violence with their little chants like the NRA's "from my cold dead hands" and Sarah Palins notorious cross hairs on elected officials faces..or Trump telling a crowd of people that a heckler should be beaten..

The right wing has a long history of vailed threats of use of violence as a scare tactic.

Is it time sane and rational people start forecably removing these tryants from power?


I know for myself if Republicans confirm this guy after all the shit he's been accused of with no investigation, then it means they dont represent the people of this nation nor our Constitutional Republic

At that point they are clearly a domestic enemy of the people and need to be dealt with.. Is this SC nomination the deal breaker on what becomes required to start forecably removing them from power?

There has to be a line in the sand..I think we are long past the point of checks and balances dealing with their corruption. Sooner or later the people will have to take a stand or tryants becomes the new normal.. What should the line in the sand be if not absolute corruption?

They've already been showing us for years what a disgusting bunch of assholes they are since Obama became president (and way before that while Bush was prez)...it's been more severe since Trump became president. They've been complicit in his lawless behavior. Every Republican member should be expelled.

[$5 submissions]

GFY version of antifa?

[baddog]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

correct, the one based on trump fraudulently winning the election with ruski help.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

correct, the one based on trump fraudulently winning the election with ruski help.

^^ This is wild conspiracy theory.

It's mind-boggling that anyone would believe such a foolish accusation. There's not a single shred of evidence that supports it. He won because Hillary is awful. Period.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

Clearly upvoting and hitting like on articles talking about corruption is doing nothing. Voting has done nothing..

What corruption? The people voted against the most corrupt politician in the history of the world.

But keep resisting and cheerleading for the psychotic liar who stole the election from Sanders

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by crockett

Is it ok to treat them like criminals and start shooting them? We are a nation of law and order, if those laws are ignored by a few in power is it then acceptable for citizens to also ignore law and order to deal with corruption and threat to democracy?

No. It is never ok in a nation of laws, regardless of what you imagine is correct, to circumvent the due process. This makes you a criminal, not a good guy. It is also the same justification used by all dictators and fascist states. Please examine your thought process.

Its always Republican nutters who use threat of violence with their little chants like the NRA's "from my cold dead hands" and Sarah Palins notorious cross hairs on elected officials faces..or Trump telling a crowd of people that a heckler should be beaten..

It is not always the republicans. Many different groups on all parts of the political spectrum threaten violence.

The right wing has a long history of vailed threats of use of violence as a scare tactic.

Again, this is a common tactic to all parts of the political spectrum.

Is it time sane and rational people start forecably removing these tryants from power?

A tyrant does not follow due process. Have you heard anyone in the senate advocate for shooting people, as you asked above? Even the most liberal member has not called for that. So no, again, it isn't. If, as opposition, you are allowed to vote, and your vote is counted, then there is by definition no tyrant.


I know for myself if Republicans confirm this guy after all the shit he's been accused of with no investigation, then it means they dont represent the people of this nation nor our Constitutional Republic

You do not know that. You may feel you are not represented, but indeed you are, and millions of others feel they are well represented. You have two senators, a representative, a governor, and local politicians. If you feel one is not doing a good job, then work to elect someone who would.

At that point they are clearly a domestic enemy of the people and need to be dealt with.. Is this SC nomination the deal breaker on what becomes required to start forecably removing them from power?

They are not in any way "clearly a domestic enemy". What does that even mean? Many of those you disagree with serve in the military and saw combat. You asked questions above, and then leaped to an unjustified conclusion. You have the means to remove politicians you don't agree with from power through the vote. If others do not vote as you want them to, then welcome to living in a free society. You can peacefully attempt to change their minds, or become a criminal yourself. Your choice.

There has to be a line in the sand..I think we are long past the point of checks and balances dealing with their corruption. Sooner or later the people will have to take a stand or tryants becomes the new normal.. What should the line in the sand be if not absolute corruption?

These are all things you think. You are one person. There are also people who think the moon is made of cheese. Your opinion matters, and your vote matters, but you are not, and never will be, a dictator. You are not an elected official, or a judge, or even a council member.

See my answers in your quote. I suggest you register to vote, find candidates you believe in, and go and volunteer and phone bank for them. Good luck.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ This is wild conspiracy theory.

It's mind-boggling that anyone would believe such a foolish accusation. There's not a single shred of evidence that supports it. He won because Hillary is awful. Period.

hardly. People smarter than you and me put together suspect somethingS. that's why there's a special investigation and dozens of people already indicted and flippers galore and gobs of evidence suggesting so.

well, I guess you are right about it being a conspiracy, a conspiracy committed by the trump family crime syndicate and its henchmen to commit fraud on the American People.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

hardly. People smarter than you and me put together suspect somethingS. that's why there's a special investigation and dozens of people already indicted and flippers galore and gobs of evidence suggesting so.

well, I guess you are right about it being a conspiracy, a conspiracy committed by the trump family crime syndicate and its henchmen to commit fraud on the American People.

You made all that up. There are no no convictions related to Trump or his campaign. Gobs of evidence? We've seen none. The evidence we do have points to the DNC email leak being inside job- someone at the server with a flash drive, not a "Russian hacker."

Also this

[dyna mo]

I didn't make jack crap up!