LOL! National Enquirer is going down

[2MuchMark]

Is anyone following this?

The tools at National Enquirer signed an agreement to help the FBI. Among other things, it says that the FBI won't go after them, as long as they tell the truth, and commit no crimes for the next 3 years.

But now it looks like they tried to extort Bezos.

If that's true, then everything NE has admitted to the FBI can be used against them.

Grabbing popcorn.

[celandina]

Bezos' home made ( out of wedlock) porn..

[Axeman]

I'm always surprised the tabloids last this long.

[crockett]

Trump is Making America Great Again because he
Attracted all the criminals like flies on shit and now they are all going down.

[Rochard]

That company is so fucking dirty it's not even funny....

[2MuchMark]

LOL!


https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...33399049168862

"National Enquirer's big Pecker tried to shaft me – but I wouldn't give him an inch" - lol! https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/0...ckmail_pecker/

[crockett]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

LOL!


https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...33399049168862

"National Enquirer's big Pecker tried to shaft me – but I wouldn't give him an inch" - lol! https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/0...ckmail_pecker/

now that's a headline

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

LOL!


https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...33399049168862

"National Enquirer's big Pecker tried to shaft me – but I wouldn't give him an inch" - lol! https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/0...ckmail_pecker/

So apparently this is what a man is willing to lose 70 billion dollars over.

Wasn't Emily Rajatowski available? He could have been fucking the entire Dallas Cowboys cheerleader squad for a tiny fraction of what his divorce will cost.

I'm just saying..if you're the richest man in the world, your side piece could be a whole lot better than a cock-eyed, over the hill plastic surgery test doll.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by bronco67

So apparently this is what a man is willing to lose 70 billion dollars over.

Wasn't Emily Rajatowski available? He could have been fucking the entire Dallas Cowboys cheerleader squad for a tiny fraction of what his divorce will cost.

I'm just saying..if you're the richest man in the world, your side piece could be a whole lot better than a cock-eyed, over the hill plastic surgery test doll.

Yes, I don't understand it either. You're ultra rich and can have anything. If you want to screw around, it just makes so much more sense to come clean with your wife and either adjust the marriage, or divorce. Why mess around and get caught and lose $70b?

Then again, Bezoz has come clean - he owned it, he's not hiding it - this is great because not only did he take away any "power" that The Enquire had, but now he may have fucked them over in the most epic way possible and simultaneously fucked Trump too.

[GAMEFINEST]

They are fucked

[RedFred]

The National Enquirer, the official rag of the right wing. What a joke these shitbags have become.

And you can bet Trump is involved in this being the piece of shit he is.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by RedFred

The National Enquirer, the official rag of the right wing. What a joke these shitbags have become.

And you can bet Trump is involved in this being the piece of shit he is.

He is absolutely involved. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.dbcd86985e2e

[Busty2]

Originally Posted by bronco67

So apparently this is what a man is willing to lose 70 billion dollars over.

Wasn't Emily Rajatowski available? He could have been fucking the entire Dallas Cowboys cheerleader squad for a tiny fraction of what his divorce will cost.

I'm just saying..if you're the richest man in the world, your side piece could be a whole lot better than a cock-eyed, over the hill plastic surgery test doll.

Yep! I feel sorry for the guy. WTF is he going to do with only 70 billion to live on ? poor fucker will have to apply for food stamps

[Acepimp]

OMG you guys actually believe the Enquirer is "going down". LOL!

Mark, you forgot to mention the part where Bezos has been harassing and threatening Mr. Pecker because the Inquirer reported about Bezos cheating on his wife. It's not Pecker's fault that Bezos is too dumb to be discreet (or just not cheat on his wife)

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

OMG you guys actually believe the Enquirer is "going down". LOL!

Mark, you forgot to mention the part where Bezos has been harassing and threatening Mr. Pecker because the Inquirer reported about Bezos cheating on his wife. It's not Pecker's fault that Bezos is too dumb to be discreet (or just not cheat on his wife)

Is there a scumbag on this planet that you don't love and defend?

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

OMG you guys actually believe the Enquirer is "going down". LOL!

Mark, you forgot to mention the part where Bezos has been harassing and threatening Mr. Pecker because the Inquirer reported about Bezos cheating on his wife. It's not Pecker's fault that Bezos is too dumb to be discreet (or just not cheat on his wife)

Before you speak....inform yourself.

[kane]

Originally Posted by bronco67

So apparently this is what a man is willing to lose 70 billion dollars over.

Wasn't Emily Rajatowski available? He could have been fucking the entire Dallas Cowboys cheerleader squad for a tiny fraction of what his divorce will cost.

I'm just saying..if you're the richest man in the world, your side piece could be a whole lot better than a cock-eyed, over the hill plastic surgery test doll.

I know nothing about this woman Bezos was with, but here is something I do know. I once dated a woman who was smoking hot. The girl had a rocking body, gorgeous face, and the best ass I have ever seen. She was also a dead fish in bed. Maybe it was me, maybe it was her, maybe it was both of us. The end result was sex was kind of boring and she wasn't really into it.

On the other hand, I dated a girl who was very average looking and was a fucking typhoon in bed. She loved to fuck and was energetic and a blast to roll around in bed with.

If I were going to cheat on my significant other and risk potential divorce and public shame, I would do it with the second girl because at least the sex was amazing.

[TheSquealer]

In the meantime, for shit that actually matters and that voters actually care about....

[SBJ]

Originally Posted by kane

I know nothing about this woman Bezos was with, but here is something I do know. I once dated a woman who was smoking hot. The girl had a rocking body, gorgeous face, and the best ass I have ever seen. She was also a dead fish in bed. Maybe it was me, maybe it was her, maybe it was both of us. The end result was sex was kind of boring and she wasn't really into it.

On the other hand, I dated a girl who was very average looking and was a fucking typhoon in bed. She loved to fuck and was energetic and a blast to roll around in bed with.

If I were going to cheat on my significant other and risk potential divorce and public shame, I would do it with the second girl because at least the sex was amazing.

yup, I've had that experience before too. LOL, one girl was so boring that when I pulled out she had told me I could cum on her nice tits but I aimed for her eye. She went batshit crazy and I said well that is the energy I was looking for during sex.

Also, the average girls don't cheat on you.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Is there a scumbag on this planet that you don't love and defend?

Simply defending the actual facts. You know, due process and all that..

Originally Posted by bronco67

Before you speak....inform yourself.

Which part was untrue?

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Simply defending the actual facts. You know, due process and all that..




Which part was untrue?

The part where you act like the cunt rag magazine is the victim of the scary Washington Post owner. You leave out lots of details...like AMI tried to extort Bezos because The Post was investigating them. That's because you're a dumb dickhead.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by kane

I know nothing about this woman Bezos was with, but here is something I do know. I once dated a woman who was smoking hot. The girl had a rocking body, gorgeous face, and the best ass I have ever seen. She was also a dead fish in bed. Maybe it was me, maybe it was her, maybe it was both of us. The end result was sex was kind of boring and she wasn't really into it.

On the other hand, I dated a girl who was very average looking and was a fucking typhoon in bed. She loved to fuck and was energetic and a blast to roll around in bed with.

If I were going to cheat on my significant other and risk potential divorce and public shame, I would do it with the second girl because at least the sex was amazing.

You have it backwards.

You can teach a partner how to be a better lover. You cannot make them beautiful.

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Is anyone following this?

The tools at National Enquirer signed an agreement to help the FBI. Among other things, it says that the FBI won't go after them, as long as they tell the truth, and commit no crimes for the next 3 years.

But now it looks like they tried to extort Bezos.

If that's true, then everything NE has admitted to the FBI can be used against them.

Grabbing popcorn.

you really indulge in shame don't you? have fun

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Rochard

You have it backwards.

You can teach a partner how to be a better lover. You cannot make them beautiful.

I like that.

I've had sex with a hottie who laid there like a sack of potatoes. I've also had sex with a few average to not so great looking girls who were hellcats in bed. I'll take the beautiful sack of potatoes because the thing that gets me off is perfect silky smooth skin, round firm ass cheeks and a symmetrical face with perfect teeth. And not all hot girls are dead fucks. They might need some extra training.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Rochard

You have it backwards.

You can teach a partner how to be a better lover. You cannot make them beautiful.

The problem is that partner has to want to get better. This girl had no interest in that. She already thought she was fantastic and if you said anything otherwise, she got pissed. It wasn't a very long relationship.

[astronaut x]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

In the meantime, for shit that actually matters and that voters actually care about....

The president doesn't control the gas prices.

This is basic shit you can't even get right.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by astronaut x

The president doesn't control the gas prices.

This is basic shit you can't even get right.

Yeah, picking up the phone and calling the Saudis to negotiate production levels had NOTHING to do with gas prices. And yeah, rescinding all of Obamas crippling executive orders/regulations to allow drilling and exploration as well as a massive ramp up in US production under Trump .. and the US then becoming the worlds largest oil producer, has nothing to do with lowering gas prices either.

Orange Man Bad!

[TheSquealer]

Trumps approval ratings went up right after the State of the Union Address.... i'm wondering how many of you had a stroke. Bipartisan Senate Intel Committee then says they've found zero evidence of Trump / Russia Collusion. Job numbers keep blowing away expectations. Pelosi caved on the wall.

It's just been a horrible week for the unhinged party of hate.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Yeah, picking up the phone and calling the Saudis to negotiate production levels had NOTHING to do with gas prices. And yeah, rescinding all of Obamas crippling executive orders/regulations to allow drilling and exploration as well as a massive ramp up in US production under Trump .. and the US then becoming the worlds largest oil producer, has nothing to do with lowering gas prices either.

Orange Man Bad!

So I guess helping them get away with Jamal Kashoggi's murder is getting is lower gas prices. Thanks Trump???

[King Mark]

Squealer just happy as hell Obama gone. That's all. He couldn't stand having a melanated folk as president.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by bronco67

So I guess helping them get away with Jamal Kashoggi's murder is getting is lower gas prices. Thanks Trump???

That's right, blame Trump when a foreigner with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organization gets killed by other foreigners in a foreign country. Makes total sense. There's no evidence the crown prince ordered it.

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

Squealer just happy as hell Obama gone. That's all. He couldn't stand having a melanated folk as president.

That's right, accuse everyone who disliked Obama of being a racist, even thought they guy was the worst president in history.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

Squealer just happy as hell Obama gone. That's all. He couldn't stand having a melanated folk as president.

Oh... you mean you are just a rabid racist that dislikes Trump only because he's white and for no other reason?

Got it.

I see how your mind works now and why you can't imagine someone disagreeing policy, when you view everything solely through the lense of race and hate.

My "melanated" girlfriend and the love of my life, is going to be super disappointed on my supposed views on "melanated" people. You stupid racist nitwit.'

[King Mark]

^^^2 more cac lies

Reality:

-Obama was ranked as the best american president in our lifetime by America.

-Trump is orange, not white. And his color doesn't matter to me, his 100% lack of political experience and his shitty lies and business tactics are why I dislike him.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

My "melanated" girlfriend and the love of my life

I did Nazi that coming.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

OMG you guys actually believe the Enquirer is "going down". LOL!

Mark, you forgot to mention the part where Bezos has been harassing and threatening Mr. Pecker because the Inquirer reported about Bezos cheating on his wife. It's not Pecker's fault that Bezos is too dumb to be discreet (or just not cheat on his wife)

ok - it is their right and maybe even their obligation to publish that suff.

but

a. why they bought such stories about trump with the intent to NOT publishing it?
b. is it also their right or obligation to blackmail bezos ?

but for you brainwashed sleepwalkers logic and arguments don't matter anyway.

[RycEric]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Is anyone following this?

The tools at National Enquirer signed an agreement to help the FBI. Among other things, it says that the FBI won't go after them, as long as they tell the truth, and commit no crimes for the next 3 years.

But now it looks like they tried to extort Bezos.

If that's true, then everything NE has admitted to the FBI can be used against them.

Grabbing popcorn.

You are really screwed when the wealthiest man in the world says this about his lawyer.
"I asked him to prioritize protecting my time since I have other things I prefer to work on and to proceed with whatever budget he needed to pursue the facts in this matter.""

[ANAL PASTE]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

In the meantime, for shit that actually matters and that voters actually care about....

Funny how in 2015 right wing shits were saying that cheap gas had nothing to do with Obama.

He's doing good in this department thought. Fastest borrower ever.



And facts on Trump's "miracle economy"..

https://slate.com/business/2019/02/f...cle-false.html

[Bladewire]

↑↑↑ Truth

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

In the meantime, for shit that actually matters and that voters actually care about....

So, If the economy is doing well thanks to Trump, any serious crimes he or people around him committed should be ignored, is that right?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Yeah, picking up the phone and calling the Saudis to negotiate production levels had NOTHING to do with gas prices. And yeah, rescinding all of Obamas crippling executive orders/regulations to allow drilling and exploration as well as a massive ramp up in US production under Trump .. and the US then becoming the worlds largest oil producer, has nothing to do with lowering gas prices either.

Orange Man Bad!

That's wrong. Here's what affects the price.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/ans...-fluctuate.asp

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

So, If the economy is doing well thanks to Trump, any serious crimes he or people around him committed should be ignored, is that right?

What crimes??????? Fake news got you believing crazy shit, dawg

After years of being spied on and investigated, there's nothing. Shouldn't you be worried about your beta cuck JT giving millions to terrorists and inviting them to flood into YOUR country??

[kane]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

In the meantime, for shit that actually matters and that voters actually care about....

In the interest of full disclosure, AAA reports that nationwide the average price for a gallon of gas in 2016 was $1.997. . . so . . . . you know . . . #thanksobama.

https://gasprices.aaa.com/average-u-...-2-per-gallon/

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

That's wrong. Here's what affects the price.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/ans...-fluctuate.asp

Notice how we are always educating Trump supporters with facts, and they are always denying them.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Yeah, picking up the phone and calling the Saudis to negotiate production levels had NOTHING to do with gas prices. And yeah, rescinding all of Obamas crippling executive orders/regulations to allow drilling and exploration as well as a massive ramp up in US production under Trump .. and the US then becoming the worlds largest oil producer, has nothing to do with lowering gas prices either.

Orange Man Bad!

becoming????

since trump ????

USA is the biggest gas producer since 1950, you honk !

but the reserves left in gas are only 1/5 of what russia have.

[onwebcam]

More fake news

Mistress’ Brother Leaked Bezos’ Racy Texts to Enquirer,

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mistre...-sources-say-7

[HairyChick]

The Enquirer has fought against big Hollywood icons and didn’t fold. I have a vague memory of Carol Burnett suing them for printing lies and they stayed alive. Each lawsuit has cost them lawyer fees but not much else. “Unnamed sources” is another word for “we made this up” and courts let them stay anonymous.

In high school I wrote a story about proving legally beyond doubt. Big star does show in Boston. I meet up with him, he stays in my bed for hours, then leaves. I claim forced sex or rape the next day. I have medical evidence and hospital reports as proof. Despite his pleas, he’s convicted of rape.

But, I lied. He had sex with me but said I was lousy in bed. He left in anger as I was in tears. I grabbed a sex toy, roughly used it, brought it home and claimed rape. Forensic tests showed his semen present. Bruises and abrasions were there.

Payback for dissing me.

Lie detector tests are inadmissible in court. Medical proof against the word of a playboy actor. I had no record and had excellent grades in school.

Hmmm ...... A+ and it was discussed for weeks. It isn’t hard to concoct the story and prove it. Evidence can be planted,witnesses can lie and today photos can be altered.

The pictures are real. Jeff admits to cheating. But how many innocent people are convicted in court and the press by false claims and false evidence? The Enquirer will hide behind anonymous people and claim they bought the hacked texts and pictures from unnamed sources. They will go to prison until they name the source. Eventually they’ll print a retraction, issue an apology, pay a fine and say information was sent anonymously, probably with a falsified handwritten note as proof.

Bezos can afford to fight this forever. The Enquirer has money but not enough. They’ll work out a deal somehow. Then they’ll continue on, making up stories with a tiny bit of truth.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by PamWinterReturns

The Enquirer will hide behind anonymous people and claim they bought the hacked texts and pictures from unnamed sources. They will go to prison until they name the source. Eventually they’ll print a retraction, issue an apology, pay a fine and say information was sent anonymously, probably with a falsified handwritten note as proof.

Normally this is how it goes, but this time its very different.

Last summer, David Pecker of AMI, owner of the National Enquirer, was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for helping with the Trump investigation. He was granted immunity because of the agreement he signed.

Here's the thing: The non-prosecution agreement also says that “it is understood […] should AMI commit any crimes subsequent to the date of signing of this Agreement, or should the Government determine that AMI or its representatives have knowingly given false, incomplete, or misleading testimony or information, or should AMI otherwise violate any provision of this Agreement, AMI shall thereafter be subject to prosecution for any federal criminal violation of this Office has knowledge, including perjury and obstruction of justice.”

Like... holy shit!

So if they find that AMI committed a crime, then everything and everything Pecker ever told the FBI is fair game. That means that Pecker and others could be going to jail. Bezoz just royally fucked them hard. And you can bet that Trump is furious over this.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Here's the thing: The non-prosecution agreement also says that “it is understood […] should AMI commit any crimes subsequent to the date of signing of this Agreement, or should the Government determine that AMI or its representatives have knowingly given false, incomplete, or misleading testimony or information, or should AMI otherwise violate any provision of this Agreement, AMI shall thereafter be subject to prosecution for any federal criminal violation of this Office has knowledge, including perjury and obstruction of justice.”

Like... holy shit!

So if they find that AMI committed a crime, then everything and everything Pecker ever told the FBI is fair game. That means that Pecker and others could be going to jail. Bezoz just royally fucked them hard. And you can bet that Trump is furious over this.

Hi Mark! Here's the thing- Bezos' mistress's brother leaked the photos to the Inquirer. There's no crime in AMI publishing leaked materials that were given to them. It's not like Mr. Pecker hacked Bezos' iCloud