zombies, shills and bots. Is there a way to weed them out? - GoFuckYourself.com

hamiltonsteele · 12-15-2021, 12:51 PM

I wrote an article for a site and they have an upvote-downvote function. I've noticed that it's not a popular
feature because a fair number of people read the site but most writers (including myself) only get a very
small handful up/down votes.

So only my latest article I got 4 upvotes and more than 600 downvotes. Now either I'm a world class
expert at pissing people off, which given my personality is a possibility, or there's a mountain of twisted
sickos that support child abuse.

Now I'm thinking that if the site ain't broken and no one likes the idea of adult's abusing children then
it must be shills or bots.

hornyasf · 12-15-2021, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hamiltonsteele

Now either I'm a world class
expert at pissing people off, which given my personality is a possibility, or there's a mountain of twisted
sickos that support child abuse.

... it's definitely the former

w4mmaps · 12-19-2021, 10:39 PM

That is an ungodly like/dislike ratio which isn't even possible naturally IMO. Even if your article was about how you like to drink piss for the vitamins in there it would have a more favorable ratio.

To answer your question though, it would be on the site to weed them out which comes down to security measures.

A couple security measures that could help with that:

1. Strict 1 vote per 1 IP address
2. Not accepting comments/votes from VPN's or other proxy IPs.

At the end of the day, the majority of people who spam in any capacity whether its votes, comments, creating fake profiles.... rely on cheap proxies to get the job done. Or loopholes like being able to use the same IP over and over again on the same article vote.

baddog · 12-19-2021, 11:09 PM

Is it possible that 600 people misinterpreted what you were trying to say?

ZTT · 12-20-2021, 03:37 AM

Depends what you wrote and on what site. I can easily believe even on reddit 2021 (as opposed to when it was openly a "jailbait" site) you'd be downvoted to oblivion for suggesting some form of censorship. Plus, yes there are an ungodly amount of people into that kind of shit.

The thing to look at is number of comments, if any. If your article wasn't controversial enough to generate more (abusive) comments than usual then the downvotes are probably fake.

hamiltonsteele · 12-20-2021, 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by w4mmaps

A couple security measures that could help with that:

1. Strict 1 vote per 1 IP address
2. Not accepting comments/votes from VPN's or other proxy IPs.

Thanks! I can't help the other site but I'm going to do this on our sites.

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Is it possible that 600 people misinterpreted what you were trying to say?

It's possible because the Internet is filled with mostly stupid people.
(Just look at the politics section)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZTT

The thing to look at is number of comments, if any. If your article wasn't controversial enough to generate more (abusive) comments than usual then the downvotes are probably fake.

I agree that Reddit is a pathetic joke but it wasn't Reddit.
Also, there wasn't a single comment written.

12-15-2021, 12:51 PM	#1
hamiltonsteele Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,041	zombies, shills and bots. Is there a way to weed them out? I wrote an article for a site and they have an upvote-downvote function. I've noticed that it's not a popular feature because a fair number of people read the site but most writers (including myself) only get a very small handful up/down votes. So only my latest article I got 4 upvotes and more than 600 downvotes. Now either I'm a world class expert at pissing people off, which given my personality is a possibility, or there's a mountain of twisted sickos that support child abuse. Now I'm thinking that if the site ain't broken and no one likes the idea of adult's abusing children then it must be shills or bots. __________________ http://steelehard.com/ الإباحية باللغة العربية Discord: https://discord.gg/QWJpmDSFc2 http://le-beverley.com/ Under Development Twitter: https://twitter.com/steele_hard Spotify : https://open.spotify.com/show/43uaTA1AEPa2Nf0Tmvppd0

12-20-2021, 03:37 AM	#5
ZTT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 657	Depends what you wrote and on what site. I can easily believe even on reddit 2021 (as opposed to when it was openly a "jailbait" site) you'd be downvoted to oblivion for suggesting some form of censorship. Plus, yes there are an ungodly amount of people into that kind of shit. The thing to look at is number of comments, if any. If your article wasn't controversial enough to generate more (abusive) comments than usual then the downvotes are probably fake. __________________ __________________

12-19-2021, 10:39 PM	#3
w4mmaps Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2019 Posts: 248	That is an ungodly like/dislike ratio which isn't even possible naturally IMO. Even if your article was about how you like to drink piss for the vitamins in there it would have a more favorable ratio. To answer your question though, it would be on the site to weed them out which comes down to security measures. A couple security measures that could help with that: 1. Strict 1 vote per 1 IP address 2. Not accepting comments/votes from VPN's or other proxy IPs. At the end of the day, the majority of people who spam in any capacity whether its votes, comments, creating fake profiles.... rely on cheap proxies to get the job done. Or loopholes like being able to use the same IP over and over again on the same article vote.

12-19-2021, 11:09 PM	#4
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,090	Is it possible that 600 people misinterpreted what you were trying to say?