Which website looks better? (PICS) - GoFuckYourself.com

Magg · 11-29-2004, 09:15 AM

I had someone make a new web design, but Im not sure if I want to use it anymore.

Which do you guys think looks better:

www.foundrynap.com

or

http://www.mr2creationz.com/28studio...ate1/index.htm

Harmon · 11-29-2004, 09:16 AM

I like #2 better. It seems less "template"ish

Pete-KT · 11-29-2004, 09:16 AM

The second one looks like a bought template that i have seen before from other sites that i visit becareful if you paid for that you might of got ripped off for a 50 dollar template.

pete

MikeVega · 11-29-2004, 09:19 AM

I like the look of the first one better ..... the smooth edges and the brushed aluminum colors ....very nice

Magg · 11-29-2004, 09:19 AM

Well, theyre both custom made, not inspired or taken from any templates.

(especially not the first one) The first one has custom made servers for us, and everything, it was the most expensive.

The second one cost only $500.

Dont know if I want to change designs though unless I get good feedback.

fris · 11-29-2004, 09:20 AM

second one

Harmon · 11-29-2004, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Magg
Well, theyre both custom made, not inspired or taken from any templates.

(especially not the first one) The first one has custom made servers for us, and everything, it was the most expensive.

The second one cost only $500.

Dont know if I want to change designs though unless I get good feedback.

Throw them both up operational and test some traffic to both

dunefield · 11-29-2004, 09:21 AM

i like the first one...

Rinaldo · 11-29-2004, 09:27 AM

number one loads faster and looks nicer
But number 2 is more simple and thus prob your best bet

tranza · 11-29-2004, 09:27 AM

I like the 2nd one better....

azguy · 11-29-2004, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Magg
I had someone make a new web design, but Im not sure if I want to use it anymore.

Which do you guys think looks better:

www.foundrynap.com

or

http://www.mr2creationz.com/28studio...ate1/index.htm

The new one. The 1st one looks too much as if it was designed using pre-made templates. I hate that in websites nowadays. The 2nd one seems so as well, but you made us choose between the both of them

poisson · 11-29-2004, 09:28 AM

cocky · 11-29-2004, 09:34 AM

Fatalspeed · 11-29-2004, 09:34 AM

both are fine but I hate those fake 'people' pictures in #2, you see them all the time at hostingsites.

loverboy · 11-29-2004, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cocky
#2

mynetporn · 11-29-2004, 09:38 AM

IMO #2 looks nicer and has more information presented at first glance.

It may be my current connection but they both take a little time to fully load.

Taboo · 11-29-2004, 09:40 AM

#1 looks more unique. but needs the pricing table/offers/guarantees from #2.
#1 looks better, but does not compel me to buy, #2 does... but only because #1 doesn't have "deals" or specials on front page.

#1 has impact but gives me no reason to explore further.

find some way to merge them perhaps.

good luck. i can see why it's hard to decide.

Wolfy · 11-29-2004, 09:42 AM

thumbs up on #2

<quote>
Who does #2 work for?
</quote>

Wolfy · 11-29-2004, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taboo
#1 looks more unique. but needs the pricing table/offers/guarantees from #2.
#1 looks better, but does not compel me to buy, #2 does... but only because #1 doesn't have "deals" or specials on front page.

#1 has impact but gives me no reason to explore further.

find some way to merge them perhaps.

good luck. i can see why it's hard to decide.

exactly

Warden · 11-29-2004, 09:45 AM

It''s close, but I like the first one

banderas · 11-29-2004, 09:48 AM

for me both are not very good...

but if I need to choose I choose #1.

sean416 · 11-29-2004, 09:52 AM

#2

the first one looks too templateish..

ironlung · 11-29-2004, 10:06 AM

i like the second one better

Zoe_Zoebaboe · 11-29-2004, 10:09 AM

I like the second one, it catches my eye a lot better than the first one

Taboo · 11-29-2004, 10:21 AM

or go with #3 and hire:
www.2advanced.com

j/k

but 2advanced sites are amazing.

justsexxx · 11-29-2004, 10:27 AM

They both look like website templates to be honest..But they both look clean and such

Andre

banderas · 11-29-2004, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taboo
or go with #3 and hire:
www.2advanced.com

perfect......

maja · 11-29-2004, 11:57 AM

the second one by far, better layout.

thePelican · 11-29-2004, 11:58 AM

a1ka1ine · 11-29-2004, 12:04 PM

Indeed · 11-29-2004, 12:06 PM

I don't really like the first one but the second one is worst. So #1.

dennisthemenace · 11-29-2004, 12:17 PM

#1 it's smoother and more pleasing to my eyes.

WickedVenus · 11-29-2004, 12:29 PM

I like 2 personally

11-29-2004, 09:19 AM	#4
MikeVega Porntrepreneur Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: New York Posts: 12,788	I like the look of the first one better ..... the smooth edges and the brushed aluminum colors ....very nice __________________ Mike Vega-ICQ:253868499-AIM:mikeydicevega

11-29-2004, 09:20 AM	#6
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,359	second one __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

11-29-2004, 09:21 AM	#8
dunefield www.barely18movies.com Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 10,920	i like the first one... __________________

11-29-2004, 09:27 AM	#10
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	I like the 2nd one better.... __________________ I'm just a newbie.

11-29-2004, 09:28 AM	#12
poisson Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sea Posts: 6,474	#2 __________________

11-29-2004, 09:15 AM	#1
Magg Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: ICQ: 132497047 Posts: 4,467	Which website looks better? (PICS) I had someone make a new web design, but Im not sure if I want to use it anymore. Which do you guys think looks better: www.foundrynap.com or http://www.mr2creationz.com/28studio...ate1/index.htm

11-29-2004, 09:16 AM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,007	I like #2 better. It seems less "template"ish __________________ [email protected]

11-29-2004, 09:16 AM	#3
Pete-KT Workin With The Devil Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: West Bloomfield, MI Posts: 51,532	The second one looks like a bought template that i have seen before from other sites that i visit becareful if you paid for that you might of got ripped off for a 50 dollar template. pete

11-29-2004, 09:27 AM	#9
Rinaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: South Florida Posts: 5,086	number one loads faster and looks nicer But number 2 is more simple and thus prob your best bet

11-29-2004, 09:34 AM	#13
cocky Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: On my couch rubbing one off ! Posts: 2,044	#2 __________________ The Best Porn Site

11-29-2004, 09:34 AM	#14
Fatalspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: How'm I gonna get a scar like that eating pussy? Posts: 2,100	both are fine but I hate those fake 'people' pictures in #2, you see them all the time at hostingsites. __________________ Faber est quisque fortunae suae

11-29-2004, 09:38 AM	#16
mynetporn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: FL Posts: 1,154	IMO #2 looks nicer and has more information presented at first glance. It may be my current connection but they both take a little time to fully load.

11-29-2004, 09:40 AM	#17
Taboo Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: I'd rather be networking than not working. Posts: 3,700	#1 looks more unique. but needs the pricing table/offers/guarantees from #2. #1 looks better, but does not compel me to buy, #2 does... but only because #1 doesn't have "deals" or specials on front page. #1 has impact but gives me no reason to explore further. find some way to merge them perhaps. good luck. i can see why it's hard to decide.

11-29-2004, 09:42 AM	#18
Wolfy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 3,574	thumbs up on #2 <quote> Who does #2 work for? </quote>

11-29-2004, 09:45 AM	#20
Warden Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Valencia, CA Posts: 2,906	It''s close, but I like the first one __________________ AIM: ZeeRiddler ICQ: 128160005 Warden's MS

11-29-2004, 09:48 AM	#21
banderas Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Bruxelles Posts: 1,086	for me both are not very good... but if I need to choose I choose #1.

11-29-2004, 09:52 AM	#22
sean416 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Toronto Posts: 3,633	#2 the first one looks too templateish.. __________________ ServerProvider.com

11-29-2004, 10:06 AM	#23
ironlung Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nofx, florida Posts: 1,012	i like the second one better

11-29-2004, 10:09 AM	#24
Zoe_Zoebaboe Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Sin City Posts: 4,463	I like the second one, it catches my eye a lot better than the first one __________________ http://www.myspace.com/jennabea ICQ: 166862923 Email: [email protected]

11-29-2004, 10:21 AM	#25
Taboo Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: I'd rather be networking than not working. Posts: 3,700	or go with #3 and hire: www.2advanced.com j/k but 2advanced sites are amazing.

11-29-2004, 10:27 AM	#26
justsexxx Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 13,723	They both look like website templates to be honest..But they both look clean and such Andre __________________ Questions? ICQ: 125184542

11-29-2004, 11:57 AM	#28
maja Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Dirty D is my human bong! Posts: 868	the second one by far, better layout. __________________ FETISH SITES PAYS ME WELL! DOES IT PAY YOU TOO? If you're in vancouver / westcoast stop by here! ~~~zombiegirl~~ I've made out with Dwreck, have you?

11-29-2004, 11:58 AM	#29
thePelican Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: theAtlanticOcean Posts: 663	#2 __________________

11-29-2004, 12:04 PM	#30
a1ka1ine Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 3,387	#1

11-29-2004, 12:06 PM	#31
Indeed Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,892	I don't really like the first one but the second one is worst. So #1.

11-29-2004, 12:17 PM	#32
dennisthemenace Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: In the present moment Posts: 2,668	#1 it's smoother and more pleasing to my eyes. __________________ All the best to you

11-29-2004, 12:29 PM	#33
WickedVenus Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: ICQ: 309691342 ---- Yahoo Messenger: wickedvenus_acv Posts: 3,877	I like 2 personally __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.