Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2005, 01:28 AM   #1
Pretty_Lara
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Barbados
Posts: 755
M-16 VS Kalashnikov....What do you think ?

Once one of russian rumour disputed about weapons, He's sure that Kalashnikov much better then M-16.
I know that sight and rate of fire kalashnikov is sucks, but he talks me that Ak-47 super for iraq and our soldiers take AK-47 like trophy and then using instead of m-16...

Then he showed me u.s. texts where u.s. army going to change all M-16 to another models (I do not exactly remember).
What you think - is M-16 really worse than AK-47 ... ?

If not - send me some url with description of M-16 and Kalashnikov to help me to convince him. thanks.
Pretty_Lara is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:30 AM   #2
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:32 AM   #3
FrankWhite
Confirmed User
 
FrankWhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 3,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM

i second that.
FrankWhite is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:34 AM   #4
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
M-16 in a shooting competition or for long range "huting" ; )

AK-47 in combat, camping trip...anywhere shit can get dirty.

Heres one of mine, only had it for a year & it needs a new barrel, i pump 300 rounds a week through it, & i can put 30 in a target within 1/2 inch

pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:36 AM   #5
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
An AK-47 is called a "rattle gun" because all the parts are placed so that sand/dirt/water, & random shit could get in the mechanism, but it would still fire.

Where as the m-16 with a little dirt might blow up in your face, or cease to fire.

So in combat conditions, within 2-300 meters, the AK-47 is superior.
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:36 AM   #6
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0
M-16 in a shooting competition or for long range "huting" ; )

AK-47 in combat, camping trip...anywhere shit can get dirty.

Heres one of mine, only had it for a year & it needs a new barrel, i pump 300 rounds a week through it, & i can put 30 in a target within 1/2 inch


I'll see yours and raise you mine with a CJ T-shirt in the pic.




EDIT.....Shit, that's my AR-15. Nevermind.
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:38 AM   #7
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
Another year or 2 & i'll need a scope too ; )D

You need to tell me where to get an a2 rail adapter for mounting one.
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 01:43 AM   #8
Vlad
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: gone
Posts: 2,864
yeah , pr0 is very correct
Vlad is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 02:43 AM   #9
Pretty_Lara
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Barbados
Posts: 755
thanks pr0, but still need some urls about M16 and AK-47, wepons guru post here
Pretty_Lara is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 02:53 AM   #10
Pleasurepays
BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in a pile of boogers
Posts: 11,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty_Lara
thanks pr0, but still need some urls about M16 and AK-47, wepons guru post here
you were clever enough to find gfy and post - but no one apparently told you about a super secret site called google.com that can actually search the web for information and give you the links.

BTW its not a secret you know. the AK was always been vastly superior to the M16 in combat. the M16 is much more complicated and delicate and too much so for crawling around in the mud. there is no argument or debate. anyone who served in vietnam typically says the same thing.
Pleasurepays is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 02:55 AM   #11
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
just link him to this thread...i'm a certified weapons expert,...hahaha
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 02:56 AM   #12
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
you were clever enough to find gfy and post - but no one apparently told you about a super secret site called google.com that can actually search the web for information and give you the links.

BTW its not a secret you know. the AK was always been vastly superior to the M16 in combat. the M16 is much more complicated and delicate and too much so for crawling around in the mud. there is no argument or debate. anyone who served in vietnam typically says the same thing.
i wouldn't go as far as vastly, but it was quite a bit more effective

of course the kill ratio in vietnam was 20:1

so unless that was just from airstrikes....i doubt it was "vastly" superior
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:07 AM   #13
Gunni
Confirmed User
 
Gunni's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 2,385
AK-74 is even better
Gunni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:08 AM   #14
Pleasurepays
BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in a pile of boogers
Posts: 11,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0
i wouldn't go as far as vastly, but it was quite a bit more effective

of course the kill ratio in vietnam was 20:1

so unless that was just from airstrikes....i doubt it was "vastly" superior
well hello... airstrikes, fighter planes/napalm and helicopter gunships strafing everything that moves, artillery, carpet bombing etc etc etc.

i am not a weapons specialist... not even sure what that means. my tiger style is quite strong though and my crane technique is unbeatable however.

when M16s were first introduced in vietnam they were killing more US soldiers than AK-47s were by constant jamming and failing. only after changing powders in the ammunition, and learning they had to constantly clean the gun all day everyday, did a lot of that stop.

other than that, no one that knows anything about weapons is going to argue that the M16 is better in combat conditions than the AK.
Pleasurepays is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:11 AM   #15
Gunni
Confirmed User
 
Gunni's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
I'll see yours and raise you mine with a CJ T-shirt in the pic.

EDIT.....Shit, that's my AR-15. Nevermind.
isn't ar-15 the same as M-16?
Gunni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:14 AM   #16
Pretty_Lara
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Barbados
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunni
AK-74 is even better
AK-74 less reliable then AK -47, that cant say the same about M16A1 .....A3

Last edited by Pretty_Lara; 07-01-2005 at 03:16 AM..
Pretty_Lara is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:16 AM   #17
Gunni
Confirmed User
 
Gunni's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
well hello... airstrikes, fighter planes/napalm and helicopter gunships strafing everything that moves, artillery, carpet bombing etc etc etc.

i am not a weapons specialist... not even sure what that means. my tiger style is quite strong though and my crane technique is unbeatable however.

when M16s were first introduced in vietnam they were killing more US soldiers than AK-47s were by constant jamming and failing. only after changing powders in the ammunition, and learning they had to constantly clean the gun all day everyday, did a lot of that stop.

other than that, no one that knows anything about weapons is going to argue that the M16 is better in combat conditions than the AK.
http://www.ak-47.us/AK-47vsM-16.php
Gunni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:18 AM   #18
Gunni
Confirmed User
 
Gunni's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty_Lara
AK-74 less reliable then AK -47, that cant say the same about M16A1 .....A3
not that much less reliable, and more accurate and not as loud
Gunni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:21 AM   #19
Ace_luffy
www.creationcrew.com
 
Ace_luffy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM
Posts: 12,180
AK-47 , an terrorist M16.... like it so much....
__________________


++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

Ace_luffy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:23 AM   #20
Ace_luffy
www.creationcrew.com
 
Ace_luffy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM
Posts: 12,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunni
isn't ar-15 the same as M-16?
maybe yes , maybe no
__________________


++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

Ace_luffy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:25 AM   #21
Ace_luffy
www.creationcrew.com
 
Ace_luffy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM
Posts: 12,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
I'll see yours and raise you mine with a CJ T-shirt in the pic.




EDIT.....Shit, that's my AR-15. Nevermind.

love this one , kill some bullshitz...
__________________


++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

Ace_luffy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:45 AM   #22
Gunni
Confirmed User
 
Gunni's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 2,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace_luffy
maybe yes , maybe no
ar-15 is just semi automatic while m-16 is automatic from what I remember,

but maybe I'm wrong, to lazy to look it up
Gunni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 03:59 AM   #23
Adultnet
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,713
The M16 has some better qualities then ak47 for example its way more accurate then AK-47, m16 has better bullet power and the fire of the bullets goes in circling motion which maximize the damage to the target in like 70% more.The m16 can easy deal with water and rainy weather condition but does not support desert weather and can get jammed pretty easy if some send gets to it... There are many versions for the m16 which reduce the weight of the original rifle and make it lighter to allow advantage of speed in built areas
__________________


TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!

Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!
Adultnet is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 04:39 AM   #24
Lee
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kernow
Posts: 2,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty_Lara
thanks pr0, but still need some urls about M16 and AK-47, wepons guru post here
Seems to me that pr0 is very much a weapons guru.
Lee is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 04:40 AM   #25
Pretty_Lara
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Barbados
Posts: 755
thanks to all guys, tomorrow post here what he saying I think its enouph to convince him
Pretty_Lara is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 05:56 AM   #26
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee
Seems to me that pr0 is very much a weapons guru.
I sleep with mine, & once a week lay in sexual congress with my rifle. I think its healthy & I like to think it creates a strong bond between us.
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 06:45 AM   #27
ezrydn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Guadalajara, MX
Posts: 695
I carried and used the M-16 for 13 months, while with the 1st of the 7th Cav in Nam in 65-66. We were a "spearhead" batallion so we were always in contact. I can't begin to tell you how many rounds went through that rifle. It was constantly in use and I always carried 2000 rounds on me.

I never had it jam on me, even in the dust, dirt and mud I was constantly in. To "clean" it, I just opened the bolt, held it under water and swished it around for a moment and then fired off a round to 'clean' it. Always worked for me.

It didn't 'rattle' when I walked, as I head the AKs do (when they walked into our ambushes).

Life on the line? I'll take an M-16 ANYfuckingTIME! Most of you have just used them for 'plinking' and use has been, at best, random. Try using one all day, all night, every day, and see what you walk away with. Oh, and it's not a fair test if your target isn't constantly shooting back at you.

"We Were Soldiers" isn't a movie to me. It's a memory!
ezrydn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 06:51 AM   #28
taibo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
lmao
taibo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:19 AM   #29
Rinaldo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,086
I carried one (m16) shit, anyone in the army carried one. THey're great. I would much rather have an mp5... or a FAL but to me those are the two best weapons, FAL any day over the AK or AR15...

The M4 which was to replace the M16 is smaller, has a shorter range but it's the same round, which is really not as lethal as you think, which someone mentioned above, but if you know anything about combat... you shoot someone and he doesn't die it takes 3 men on average to lift him out of the area... so instead of killing one you took out 4 from the fight... wounding someone is almost always better.
Rinaldo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:30 AM   #30
Fucked Beyond Repair
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty_Lara
thanks pr0, but still need some urls about M16 and AK-47, wepons guru post here
http://kalashnikov.guns.ru/ has lots of info about the AK-47.
Fucked Beyond Repair is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:30 AM   #31
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty_Lara
Once one of russian rumour disputed about weapons, He's sure that Kalashnikov much better then M-16.
I know that sight and rate of fire kalashnikov is sucks, but he talks me that Ak-47 super for iraq and our soldiers take AK-47 like trophy and then using instead of m-16...

Then he showed me u.s. texts where u.s. army going to change all M-16 to another models (I do not exactly remember).
What you think - is M-16 really worse than AK-47 ... ?

If not - send me some url with description of M-16 and Kalashnikov to help me to convince him. thanks.
There was a History Channel documentary on this, and they tested them both. They had a whole series of examples, and situations they put them through. From just basic shooting, to environments, and so forth.

The AK-47 is superior to the M-16.

__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:31 AM   #32
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinaldo
I carried one (m16) shit, anyone in the army carried one. THey're great. I would much rather have an mp5... or a FAL but to me those are the two best weapons, FAL any day over the AK or AR15...

The M4 which was to replace the M16 is smaller, has a shorter range but it's the same round, which is really not as lethal as you think, which someone mentioned above, but if you know anything about combat... you shoot someone and he doesn't die it takes 3 men on average to lift him out of the area... so instead of killing one you took out 4 from the fight... wounding someone is almost always better.
Yep. Heard the same thing about the M4. Apparently a very nice weapon.

__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:34 AM   #33
Fucked Beyond Repair
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 565
"I would prefer to have invented a machine that people could use and that would help farmers with their work - for example a lawnmower."

? Mikhail Kalashnikov, designer of the AK-47 assault rifle
Fucked Beyond Repair is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 07:34 AM   #34
DarkJedi
No Refunds Issued.
 
DarkJedi's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GFY
Posts: 28,300
M-16s had all sorts of jamming problems during the Vietnam war. It was so bad that that US soldiers would often pick up & use AK-47s since they were more reliable.

30+ years later, I see the M-16 is still a jamming piece of shit.

Thats why US special forces are using captured AKs.
DarkJedi is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 08:13 AM   #35
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 73,392
I carried an M16 for four years of my life. While I never was in combat, I got a kick out of firing the gun and more often than not I could found on the rifle range. Never had one jam up on me. Same thing when out in the field firing blanks.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 08:23 AM   #36
palladin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 97
AK less accurate but larger round and more robust, so would prefer the AK up to a coupla hundred yards. Saw at TV prog a year or so where they fired both at 200 yards at a target situated behind a tree. The M16 round stuck in the tree, the AK blew a f****ing great hole in the tree. But the AK couldnt hit shit at longer range, the M16 did. Friend of mine in the Israeli army told me they had found AKs stuck muzzle down in the ground which they then pulled through and fired. With an M16 you would have got your arms blown off, if it had fired at all. My army (the British) have the SA-80. The mk1 probably wouldnt have fired half the time anyway, no matter how clean you kept it, though I understand the latest mark is OK.
__________________
Get yer Tits out for the boys
www.kuntzinternational.com
palladin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 08:28 AM   #37
loverboy
When it rains, it pours
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 20,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace_luffy
love this one , kill some bullshitz...
stupid noob, fix SIG

loverboy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 09:09 AM   #38
VeriSexy
Join The Royal Family
 
VeriSexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 25,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0
An AK-47 is called a "rattle gun" because all the parts are placed so that sand/dirt/water, & random shit could get in the mechanism, but it would still fire.

Where as the m-16 with a little dirt might blow up in your face, or cease to fire.

So in combat conditions, within 2-300 meters, the AK-47 is superior.
Yeah AK-47 was far more reliable in Vietnam
__________________
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos
.
With TOP RATIO Sites like


ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com |
TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com


VeriSexy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 09:45 AM   #39
DarkJedi
No Refunds Issued.
 
DarkJedi's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GFY
Posts: 28,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by RocHard
I carried an M16 for four years of my life. While I never was in combat...

You all talk about how good m16 is if you keep it nice and clean.
Of course it doesnt jam during practice shooting when you clean it after every use.

The thing jams when you're out in the desert or in the jungle. When there is war going on around and you simply dont have the time or mean to clean it. In the middle of the battle it gets some sand or some water inside and all of the sudden it stops working. Thats when it makes a difference.
DarkJedi is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 10:02 AM   #40
KRL
Entrepreneur
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 31,429
I've shot with the AR-15 aka M16. That gun is awesome and packs one nasty punch.

Never shot the AK but its rep as a top notch weapon is well known around the world.
__________________
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
KRL is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 10:30 AM   #41
PornGeneral
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In front of computer
Posts: 564
In any situation I would have to choose between an AK-47 or M16 based on the need. Each weapon has its benifits and downfalls, in the heat of battle your needs are always changing.
__________________
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." -Patton
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." -Plato
PornGeneral is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 10:31 AM   #42
BV
wtf
 
BV's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bikini State, FL USA
Posts: 10,914
M-16 shoots a .22 caliber bullet and wounds it's victims more than it kills. A wounded enemy is better than a dead enemy because a wounded enemy takes 2 or more additional enemy soldiers to care for him where as a dead enemy does not require anyone.

Also US went to the m-16 .222 caliber round because soldiers can carry about 30% more rounds with the same weight as what they were used too. They used to use .308 rounds (7.62mm x 51mm) in the M-14 which is the same caliber as an AK-47 round (7.62 x 39mm). just slightly longer casing and powder lengthening the case to 51mm

All of you I'm sure have heard of the 30-06 (M1-Garand) This is what US used before the M-14 .308. Still a 30 caliber bullet just slightly longer case yet 7.62 x 59mm. This is the grandaddy of all the 7.62mm 30 caliber bullets.

For flat out kill power any of the 30 caliber bullets are far superior than a twinky m-16 .222 round as it's only .22 caliber, very small, but very very fast and when it hits your target it tumbles. So you hit them in the leg it might end up in his gut wounding him even more. You hit the same target in the same spot with a .308 and it will most likely just blow the leg off. Hit him in the chest with a 30 caliber and your kill factor is much higher than the little 22 caliber m-16

To put it simple, bigger is better.
BV is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 10:33 AM   #43
Rich
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,486
Like pr0 said, the AK47's are better for desert combat because it's almost impossible for them to get jammed up.

P.S. Doesn't the US army use M4s or something now, not M16s?
Rich is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 10:43 AM   #44
jimmyf
OU812
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 12,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by BV
M-16 shoots a .22 caliber bullet and wounds it's victims more than it kills. A wounded enemy is better than a dead enemy because a wounded enemy takes 2 or more additional enemy soldiers to care for him where as a dead enemy does not require anyone.

Also US went to the m-16 .222 caliber round because soldiers can carry about 30% more rounds with the same weight as what they were used too. They used to use .308 rounds (7.62mm x 51mm) in the M-14 which is the same caliber as an AK-47 round (7.62 x 39mm). just slightly longer casing and powder lengthening the case to 51mm

All of you I'm sure have heard of the 30-06 (M1-Garand) This is what US used before the M-14 .308. Still a 30 caliber bullet just slightly longer case yet 7.62 x 59mm. This is the grandaddy of all the 7.62mm 30 caliber bullets.

For flat out kill power any of the 30 caliber bullets are far superior than a twinky m-16 .222 round as it's only .22 caliber, very small, but very very fast and when it hits your target it tumbles. So you hit them in the leg it might end up in his gut wounding him even more. You hit the same target in the same spot with a .308 and it will most likely just blow the leg off. Hit him in the chest with a 30 caliber and your kill factor is much higher than the little 22 caliber m-16

To put it simple, bigger is better.
I used the M14 when I was in the Army. Good rifle...

from 600 yards (with out scope) I could put it in a 1 foot bulls eye. And at 600 yards that bulls eye is a tiny spec.

M-16 VS Kalashnikov. Was on TV the other day, think it was the History channel.
__________________
Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

Last edited by jimmyf; 07-01-2005 at 10:45 AM..
jimmyf is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:02 AM   #45
vantage
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: BERLIN :: GERMANY
Posts: 214
I saw lot of M16 and kalashnikov fucked up at Guyana training...


FRF2, my best friend....
http://www.nme.de/CGI-SHL/NME/VIEWPI...ID=2708&cat=36
__________________
vantage is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:05 AM   #46
smack
Push Porn Like Weight.
 
smack's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Inside .NET
Posts: 10,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by BV
M-16 shoots a .22 caliber bullet and wounds it's victims more than it kills. A wounded enemy is better than a dead enemy because a wounded enemy takes 2 or more additional enemy soldiers to care for him where as a dead enemy does not require anyone.

actually it's not a .22 it is slightly larger .223 (5.56mm)
__________________
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
smack is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:13 AM   #47
Buzz
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,908
what you say about that piece guys?

http://world.guns.ru/assault/as08-e.htm
Buzz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:26 AM   #48
JD
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 22,651
http://www.floridagunworks.com/Merch...REARMS+R+SAR+T

woo woo
JD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:33 AM   #49
dready
Confirmed User
 
dready's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 5,247
M16A2 (The version Canadians added 109 updates to), is more accurate (especially in full auto), less recoil, lightweight.

The AK is more reliable, cheaper, and much more powerful.

I've used the C7 assault rifle (Canadian M16) when I was in the army, and owned a Chinese SKS (semi auto predecesor to AK) and would take the C7 any day. I also owned an FN battle rifle (Indian L1A1 actually) and man that thing really packed a punch.
__________________
ICQ: 91139591
dready is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2005, 11:39 AM   #50
Relish XXX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: www.adultlabel.com
Posts: 4,904
Who cares I am in the UK and here is the baddest weapon you can buy in a shop legally.

__________________

Relish XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.