Is HD porn the future? only for you or every one? (HOT PICS INSIDE) - GoFuckYourself.com

dirtymind · 12-04-2008, 06:12 AM

What do you think about hd porn. I think it sure can be the future and should be the future. still i see not that many sponsors switching to HD. It does cost more yes, does it pay more. I not that sure as many other content providers on the web are not shooting in HD so there are still niches where you don't even have a HD choice. But would you as surfer go for HD Porn? I would be then again my pc and IP allow it.

So my conclusion is that it all about the internet speed and for webmasters it is all about how much money more they make with turning their sites into HD sites. I think it is still a tricky thing in the industry.

What do you think?

O yeah here is some eye candy if you think this thread blows

enjoy the pics

ilbb · 12-04-2008, 06:25 AM

youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level...

I wonder when there will be illegal tube offering HD video for free.

andy83 · 12-04-2008, 06:39 AM

i hope some illegal tubes do move to hd, and then we can laugh at their bandwidth costs.

Mutt · 12-04-2008, 06:43 AM

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

tranza · 12-04-2008, 06:43 AM

Pretty nice babes!

pornguy · 12-04-2008, 06:50 AM

Hot babes but even those have been squashed by the system here and dont look HD any more.

RedShoe · 12-04-2008, 07:21 AM

Nothing like shooting with an HD cam and squishing everything down in WMV.

And some things were never meant to be shot in HD.

Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD.

A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

kowalsky · 12-04-2008, 07:23 AM

Nice nenas!

LA Crew · 12-04-2008, 07:26 AM

HD is the future

CashGordon · 12-04-2008, 07:31 AM

HD is the future and it is our only salvation against this much free porn on the net. That is why we have converted more than 20 of our sites to HD.

Manowar · 12-04-2008, 07:32 AM

hot looking girls

mikesouth · 12-04-2008, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

yer a moron I have been doing real HD for almost a year play it on your puter, your PS3, or your xbox360.

CaptainHowdy · 12-04-2008, 09:08 AM

I would HD those two anyday of the week, that's for sure...

Fletch XXX · 12-04-2008, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe

Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD.

A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

umm this makes no sense homie, sorry but I push shemale stuff and do not like "pretty girl" content, shemales should be shot in HD too. ;)

just because YOU dont want to see it in HD, doesnt mean the ts lovers dont ese

Kudles · 12-04-2008, 11:38 AM

Cute girls

dirtymind · 12-05-2008, 07:12 AM

well all some good points here. But i guess we will not even be able aviod the HD train it is coming if you want it or ot. I happy that we are HD from the start and many years to come.

How about the prices, is profit just going donw or are memebership prices going up.

I think there is a third solution, get the money you lose (earn less) some where else, like from an upsell or exit trades etc. May possible ways to maximize your profit off your members. What do you think?

HorseShit · 12-05-2008, 07:16 AM

nice content

dirtymind · 12-05-2008, 08:01 AM

thanks man. we are trying to be the future. lol

Serial Pervert · 12-05-2008, 08:16 AM

pretty babes

A-n-D-r-E-S · 12-05-2008, 09:37 AM

Nice content, these girls are very hot!

alexchechs · 12-05-2008, 11:38 AM

We have been shooting in HD for a while and putting alot of our content out in HD lately. I think it's worth it if you have a good customer base.

Chicks Delivery · 12-05-2008, 12:00 PM

Nice pics there, mate!

Paul Markham · 12-05-2008, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

That's something that flies over the top of most of the heads here.

The members want good porn first and last. Not HD.

dirtymind there are so many things wrong with your second picture that I find it amazing you put it up as a sample to spam your work. The first girl is all right but I suspect a lot of Photoshop has gone into that picture. Do you do the same correcting with video?

If you don't see what's wrong, a HD camera is not the solution.

Lastly most people shooting in HD are clueless how to light it and what models should never be in front of a HD camera.

stickyfingerz · 12-05-2008, 12:20 PM

lol at some of the responses in this thread.

Paul Markham · 12-05-2008, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

lol at some of the responses in this thread.

That's what I was thinking.

dirtymind · 12-05-2008, 12:37 PM

Paul Markham i don't see anything wrong with the second girl and seems the other people also dont see it. This thread is to talk about HD not about how the girls are shot.

If you had read this thread well you should now that i am not a content producers. Does this link to a content site? no. I do affiliate management. Second it sounds like you want to turn people off because you think there is something wrong with the second girl. go nag in some else thread, ok Paul

Please stay on topic or stay out of the thread.

LisaWP · 12-05-2008, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe

A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

Thank you for helping me stay on a diet today. That visual has me queasy.

leek · 12-05-2008, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilbb

youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level...

Switching to HD certainly put Vimeo on the map. Although their extremely sexy site could have attributed also.

bbm · 12-05-2008, 01:28 PM

Nice girls

NaughtyRob · 12-05-2008, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

While that is true the quality is amazing and way better than the highest quality SD. Forget the buffering, just let them download the videos.

dirtymind · 12-05-2008, 01:31 PM

well i still have doubt if youtube will really need that hd player. I mean they have hardly any users shooting in hd. I think it would be their advertisers that will use it.

woj · 12-05-2008, 01:42 PM

People have always wanted high quality stuff, wherever it's "true HD" or not is irrelevant, as long as your stuff is higher quality, loads faster, streams better, etc than your competitors you will get more signups/rebills...

dirtymind · 12-06-2008, 04:44 AM

well the loading it where the tricky part is and where also part of the investment is going to. streaming it online will take really fast connections. But also a fast connection on the part of the surfer. i think the surfer should makeup for its self if he is ready to watch hd. We could only advise him to download or stream it. noway people will stick around if you only have hd in your members are . For many it will take ages to download or to stream.

uno · 12-06-2008, 01:23 PM

I have some badass HD domains if anyone is interested.

stickyfingerz · 12-06-2008, 01:31 PM

Most of the "ifs" in this thread have been reality for awhile. lol

dirtymind · 12-08-2008, 06:56 AM

true that most have been reality but for how many.

stickyfingerz · 12-08-2008, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtymind

true that most have been reality but for how many.

We stream 720p with no problems.

Ravensp · 12-15-2008, 09:21 AM

Maybe after is IMAX porn ;)

Violetta · 12-15-2008, 09:23 AM

hot girl§!

tony286 · 12-15-2008, 09:34 AM

HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.

shako · 12-15-2008, 10:04 AM

Nice girls

stickyfingerz · 12-15-2008, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.

This is one of those things that you and I disagree on Tony lol

bloggingseo · 12-15-2008, 10:22 AM

HD will be the standard one of these days

bronco67 · 12-15-2008, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

he's right.
'
Besides, who wants to see some skank's butt zits in HD? Lo-Def hides the flaws we don't want to see.

Drake · 12-15-2008, 10:31 AM

Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video.

But just like images, I prefer the super high quality huge high resolution images over small grainy ones. Back in the day there were only a handful of Alsscan type quality sites, but it's the standard now.

When true HD video becomes available, surfers will definitely opt for it if it can be downloaded/saved and viewed quickly. If they have the hardware to handle it and the option of viewing HD vs regular, they'll choose HD.

bronco67 · 12-15-2008, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33

Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video.

I'm very into new tech, I build my own computers, I'm an internet geek, I love my HiDef TV set and Blu Ray HD DVDs, BUT -- I still prefer smaller clips when it comes to porn. As long as I can see that the girl is hot, and more importantly, the scene is well made and the director knows how to shoot the girl properly(and she gets hammered properly), I could really care less if I can count the skin cells on her forearm. Plus, I don't want to download gigabytes of porn video.

Penny Flame · 12-15-2008, 10:55 AM

lol at the skank whore with zits on her ass.....

But really, its fucking hard to shoot in HD, to be shot in HD, and I don't personally like seeing myself so clearly. Must be why I smoke weed.

But really, most of the girls aren't perfect, myself included, so when HD does become the way, the only way, or whatever the fuck GFYers wanna call it, viewers will either love the girl, because being that she is shot in HD and still looks hot it will make the attraction that much stronger, or the viewer will hate the girl and be incredibly disappointed by how she "really looks".

Its gotta be hard to find out that your favorite pornstar has really bad acne from years of meth abuse and the only reason you never knew is because videographers haven't been shooting in HD.

I've fucked most of these bitches and trust me, HD shows just a little bit too much.....

and that earlier post was right, capture's bitches MUST be shot in HD. Fly ass ho's

stickyfingerz · 12-15-2008, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

I'm very into new tech, I build my own computers, I'm an internet geek, I love my HiDef TV set and Blu Ray HD DVDs, BUT -- I still prefer smaller clips when it comes to porn. As long as I can see that the girl is hot, and more importantly, the scene is well made and the director knows how to shoot the girl properly(and she gets hammered properly), I could really care less if I can count the skin cells on her forearm. Plus, I don't want to download gigabytes of porn video.

If you are up on tech then you would know that streaming HD is not only possible, its already a reality.

Did anyone notice that Youtube now allows 1GB uploads? Im doing my music stuff and uploading 720p vids which I can open full screen on a 22" monitor at TV quality or better.

All you people best catch up.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ

Make sure to click the Watch in HD on the bottom right corner right under the video.

Downloading gigs of content pfft lol

Btw open that clip full screen, then try to tell me about can't stream HD pfft. We already were doing this months and months ago.

stickyfingerz · 12-15-2008, 11:06 AM

Can I have some grainy vids please? I heard they are coming out with MOVING PICTURE SHOWS soon! woot!

found direct link so you don't have to click watch in HD

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ&fmt=22

PornstarXS · 12-15-2008, 11:07 AM

i think it's a touchy subject you can go either way. if you have surfers who are into HD content they will possibly like your hd content. but it's about the content first. if they arent drawn to it then it doesnt matter if you have it in HD. just look how many people go to tube sites with the crappiest quality.

Now if it's in HD what file sizes are you looking at? a 30min scene 720x540 at 2200kps you're looking at about 500-700mb. So how big is it for HD the same scene? 2gb ? that's kind of nuts for 1 scene. when you think about it members often download as much as they can for one month then quit. So you'll probably have to be one of those programs like realitykings that restricts the amount you can download in one day. that kind of sucks that you offer HD but then may have to restrict your members a daily download limit. or worse charge $50/month

i just hope that HD is just a download option, because from my stats on my site members tend to download the high versions more than the DVD quality. you have 2 types of members: ones who go for the highest quality and save the movies they download and then there are the ones who download, whack off and delete. The latter just wants to tug one off so it's about downloading as fast as they can and ease of viewing content. of course there are all types of surfers, some download lower quality versions and like it and want higher quality rips for saving.

like some posters said previously, it's about people's connections and computers. if you're itching to rub one out i dont want to wait 60 minutes for my download to finish and then be pissed when my computer goes into epileptic shock. or worse it ends up being a horrible scene and now i have to wait another 60 minutes for another download. and while many of us have fast connections you cant forget about the all your potential surfers.

12-04-2008, 06:12 AM	#1
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	Is HD porn the future? only for you or every one? (HOT PICS INSIDE) What do you think about hd porn. I think it sure can be the future and should be the future. still i see not that many sponsors switching to HD. It does cost more yes, does it pay more. I not that sure as many other content providers on the web are not shooting in HD so there are still niches where you don't even have a HD choice. But would you as surfer go for HD Porn? I would be then again my pc and IP allow it. So my conclusion is that it all about the internet speed and for webmasters it is all about how much money more they make with turning their sites into HD sites. I think it is still a tricky thing in the industry. What do you think? O yeah here is some eye candy if you think this thread blows enjoy the pics __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-04-2008, 06:39 AM	#3
andy83 Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,605	i hope some illegal tubes do move to hd, and then we can laugh at their bandwidth costs. __________________ Available Skimmed Traffic Available Ad Spots BUY NICHE BANNER CLICKS OR IMPRESSIONS, SELL YOUR SPOTS FOR A FLAT RATE, SELL YOUR AD SPOTS WITH PROTRAFFIC.COM

12-04-2008, 06:43 AM	#4
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer. the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

12-04-2008, 06:43 AM	#5
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Pretty nice babes! __________________ I'm just a newbie.

12-04-2008, 06:50 AM	#6
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Hot babes but even those have been squashed by the system here and dont look HD any more. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

12-04-2008, 06:25 AM	#2
ilbb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: EU - Czech republic Posts: 3,025	youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level... I wonder when there will be illegal tube offering HD video for free.

12-04-2008, 07:21 AM	#7
RedShoe 赤い靴 call me 202-456-1111 Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: The Valley Posts: 14,831	Nothing like shooting with an HD cam and squishing everything down in WMV. And some things were never meant to be shot in HD. Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD. A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD. __________________ SPECIALTY COSTUMES • PROPS • FX Superheroes • Monsters • Robots PM for details For any manufacturing needs. Adult or otherwise. aka BonsHigh on Insta Bonsai weed plants

12-04-2008, 07:23 AM	#8
kowalsky Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 2,494	Nice nenas! __________________ Jimmy Kowalsky www.catchycash.com [email protected] ICQ - 7319094

12-04-2008, 07:26 AM	#9
LA Crew Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: city of angels Posts: 1,356	HD is the future __________________

12-04-2008, 07:31 AM	#10
CashGordon at your service Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver Posts: 1,201	HD is the future and it is our only salvation against this much free porn on the net. That is why we have converted more than 20 of our sites to HD. __________________ SEXTRONIX \| DATETRONIX \| HENTAIBIZ \| PIMPBOSS \| GAYTRONIX icq#306500802 cashgordon\|\|at\|\|sextronix.com

12-04-2008, 07:32 AM	#11
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	hot looking girls

12-04-2008, 09:08 AM	#13
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,395	I would HD those two anyday of the week, that's for sure... __________________ "Tjeezers.cam wishes you a nice day”

12-04-2008, 11:38 AM	#15
Kudles Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Here There and Everywhere Posts: 5,477	Cute girls __________________ Free to Play MMOs and MMORPGs

12-05-2008, 07:12 AM	#16
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	well all some good points here. But i guess we will not even be able aviod the HD train it is coming if you want it or ot. I happy that we are HD from the start and many years to come. How about the prices, is profit just going donw or are memebership prices going up. I think there is a third solution, get the money you lose (earn less) some where else, like from an upsell or exit trades etc. May possible ways to maximize your profit off your members. What do you think? __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-05-2008, 07:16 AM	#17
HorseShit Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 17,513	nice content

12-05-2008, 08:01 AM	#18
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	thanks man. we are trying to be the future. lol __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-05-2008, 08:16 AM	#19
Serial Pervert Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,666	pretty babes __________________

12-05-2008, 09:37 AM	#20
A-n-D-r-E-S Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,949	Nice content, these girls are very hot! __________________ Adult Copywriters Hire a writer to create original content for your website.

12-05-2008, 11:38 AM	#21
alexchechs Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: BROOKLYN!!! Posts: 3,474	We have been shooting in HD for a while and putting alot of our content out in HD lately. I think it's worth it if you have a good customer base. __________________ Alex Chechs http://thefawnconspiracy.com

12-05-2008, 12:00 PM	#22
Chicks Delivery Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,315	Nice pics there, mate! __________________ Let me deliver you some chicks! Check out my Blog!

12-05-2008, 12:20 PM	#24
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	lol at some of the responses in this thread.

12-05-2008, 12:37 PM	#26
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	Paul Markham i don't see anything wrong with the second girl and seems the other people also dont see it. This thread is to talk about HD not about how the girls are shot. If you had read this thread well you should now that i am not a content producers. Does this link to a content site? no. I do affiliate management. Second it sounds like you want to turn people off because you think there is something wrong with the second girl. go nag in some else thread, ok Paul Please stay on topic or stay out of the thread. __________________ skype: codercarlos Last edited by dirtymind; 12-05-2008 at 12:39 PM..

12-05-2008, 01:28 PM	#29
bbm So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,710	Nice girls

12-05-2008, 01:31 PM	#31
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	well i still have doubt if youtube will really need that hd player. I mean they have hardly any users shooting in hd. I think it would be their advertisers that will use it. __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-05-2008, 01:42 PM	#32
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	People have always wanted high quality stuff, wherever it's "true HD" or not is irrelevant, as long as your stuff is higher quality, loads faster, streams better, etc than your competitors you will get more signups/rebills... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

12-06-2008, 04:44 AM	#33
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	well the loading it where the tricky part is and where also part of the investment is going to. streaming it online will take really fast connections. But also a fast connection on the part of the surfer. i think the surfer should makeup for its self if he is ready to watch hd. We could only advise him to download or stream it. noway people will stick around if you only have hd in your members are . For many it will take ages to download or to stream. __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-06-2008, 01:23 PM	#34
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	I have some badass HD domains if anyone is interested. __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

12-06-2008, 01:31 PM	#35
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	Most of the "ifs" in this thread have been reality for awhile. lol

12-08-2008, 06:56 AM	#36
dirtymind Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,348	true that most have been reality but for how many. __________________ skype: codercarlos

12-15-2008, 09:21 AM	#38
Ravensp Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: DDF Posts: 46	Maybe after is IMAX porn ;)

12-15-2008, 09:23 AM	#39
Violetta Affiliate Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 28,735	hot girl§! __________________ M&A Queen

12-15-2008, 09:34 AM	#40
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.

12-15-2008, 10:04 AM	#41
shako Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 237	Nice girls __________________ Rom Art Studio - Adult Webdesign Studio Skype shako1322 ICQ 480403786

12-15-2008, 10:22 AM	#43
bloggingseo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Austin Posts: 1,793	HD will be the standard one of these days __________________ Writing mainstream and adult since 2003 Hit me up ICQ 375089597

12-15-2008, 10:31 AM	#45
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video. But just like images, I prefer the super high quality huge high resolution images over small grainy ones. Back in the day there were only a handful of Alsscan type quality sites, but it's the standard now. When true HD video becomes available, surfers will definitely opt for it if it can be downloaded/saved and viewed quickly. If they have the hardware to handle it and the option of viewing HD vs regular, they'll choose HD.