Minimum payouts - GoFuckYourself.com

HighEnergy · 09-11-2009, 11:03 PM

Minimum payouts as a payor or payee, what's your opinion?

Phallus Fondue · 09-11-2009, 11:19 PM

i use ccbill for both so they really do not apply.

as a payee they do not bother me as long as they are reasonable to achieve during a test of a sponsor so lets say 30-60. i also think that all sponsors should clear out any people who did not meet minimums each quarter, yearly, or something. nobody like to find a shitty sponsor, not want to send valuable traffic for next to no sales to reach the damn minimum payout.

as a payor i could see setting them in place as a way to give time to check for fraud. also to allow a small amount of time for float so that i can be assured we have the money from the bank and that the transactions cleared. it also takes time and resources to print out checks or even send electronic payments and nobody wants to process a bunch of tiny ones each week.

09-11-2009, 11:03 PM	#1
HighEnergy So Fucking Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 806	Minimum payouts Minimum payouts as a payor or payee, what's your opinion?

09-11-2009, 11:19 PM	#2
Phallus Fondue Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 418	i use ccbill for both so they really do not apply. as a payee they do not bother me as long as they are reasonable to achieve during a test of a sponsor so lets say 30-60. i also think that all sponsors should clear out any people who did not meet minimums each quarter, yearly, or something. nobody like to find a shitty sponsor, not want to send valuable traffic for next to no sales to reach the damn minimum payout. as a payor i could see setting them in place as a way to give time to check for fraud. also to allow a small amount of time for float so that i can be assured we have the money from the bank and that the transactions cleared. it also takes time and resources to print out checks or even send electronic payments and nobody wants to process a bunch of tiny ones each week.