Adult Industry Attorney - GoFuckYourself.com

deadbabes · 07-07-2010, 02:06 PM

I can't find anyone in my area, concerning the interpretation of 2257. All I want to do is show tits on my site. No porn, no cock, no vag, just tits. There was an attorney (I believe he was from Tampa, FL.) who posted here awhile back. Does anyone know his name? Thanks in advance!

fatfoo · 07-07-2010, 02:12 PM

I think in Toronto women are allowed to walk topless outside, even.
Rules about tits are different in different locations.

Jon Oso · 07-07-2010, 02:38 PM

adultbizlaw.com

deadbabes · 07-07-2010, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Oso

adultbizlaw.com

thanks, jon

dillonaire · 07-07-2010, 02:46 PM

what if the guy is topless. do you still need 2257?

2MuchMark · 07-07-2010, 03:06 PM

tits = porn = illegal in most places still, unfortunately.

BigDeanEvans · 07-07-2010, 03:13 PM

There is one in FL and may i suggest you be very careful with your retainer because they will bleed it fucking dry before you even use them.

Way3 · 07-07-2010, 03:17 PM

You may want see if Larry Walters can help you. He is in Florida!
http://firstamendment.com/

CIVMatt · 07-07-2010, 03:19 PM

Can I see your tits?

Ron Bennett · 07-07-2010, 03:20 PM

Below is a copy and paste of my reply from the thread http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=972124 regarding clothed models. While the OPs situation in that thread is different, my response to it, and that of others, will likely be helpful in regards to your question too.

If the pictures are intended to be of a sexual nature (and/or the websites / venues they're shown in), even if no nudity, 2257 would be wise to have.

Nudity alone isn't what determines whether a 2257 is required or not, but rather the intended use of the pictures. Nudism books, such as one will find on Amazon, B&N, etc, often have no 2257s on file and depict people of all ages, including minors, in the nude.

Digress a bit, but point is that it's how the pictures are posed / intended use that determines whether one needs a 2257 ... based on what you've described, in my view, you need to ensure all models, even those fully clothed, are of legal age and have 2257s for all of them.

With all that said, definitely consult with an attorney experienced with the adult business before hiring any models, let alone shooting any content.

Ron

pornlaw · 07-07-2010, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deadbabes

I can't find anyone in my area, concerning the interpretation of 2257. All I want to do is show tits on my site. No porn, no cock, no vag, just tits. There was an attorney (I believe he was from Tampa, FL.) who posted here awhile back. Does anyone know his name? Thanks in advance!

Im the attorney that owns AdultBizLaw.com. Let me save you some money.

Tits, just regular bare tits are considered nudity and exempt from 2257 regs. Squeeze a nipple and now you have content that will require docs and IDs.

V_RocKs · 07-08-2010, 04:41 PM

What about if the tits are on a site that is promoting them for porn?

L-Pink · 07-08-2010, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatfoo

I think in Toronto women are allowed to walk topless outside, even.
Rules about tits are different in different locations.

They can where I live as well ..... in Tampa.

.

deadbabes · 07-08-2010, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Im the attorney that owns AdultBizLaw.com. Let me save you some money.

Tits, just regular bare tits are considered nudity and exempt from 2257 regs. Squeeze a nipple and now you have content that will require docs and IDs.

Thanks so much for that response. I'll be taking down your information, should I ever need it.

Ron Bennett · 07-08-2010, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

What about if the tits are on a site that is promoting them for porn?

Then you likely need 2257s.

Ron

07-07-2010, 02:06 PM	#1
deadbabes Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Your mom's basement Posts: 366	Adult Industry Attorney I can't find anyone in my area, concerning the interpretation of 2257. All I want to do is show tits on my site. No porn, no cock, no vag, just tits. There was an attorney (I believe he was from Tampa, FL.) who posted here awhile back. Does anyone know his name? Thanks in advance! __________________ http://prettywasted.com

07-07-2010, 02:12 PM	#2
fatfoo ICQ:649699063 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 27,763	I think in Toronto women are allowed to walk topless outside, even. Rules about tits are different in different locations. __________________ Send me an email: [email protected]

07-07-2010, 02:38 PM	#3
Jon Oso Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cardboard Box Posts: 2,241	adultbizlaw.com __________________ icq 416133583 My Blog Clips4Sale Store

07-07-2010, 02:46 PM	#5
dillonaire Confirmed User Join Date: May 2009 Location: San Francisco Posts: 1,795	what if the guy is topless. do you still need 2257? __________________ . "Deja moo - The feeling you've heard this Bull before." Skype: jeffreydillon Email: [email protected]

07-07-2010, 03:06 PM	#6
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,777	tits = porn = illegal in most places still, unfortunately. __________________ Custom Software \| Server Management \| Integration and Technology Solutions https://www.2much.net

07-07-2010, 03:13 PM	#7
BigDeanEvans So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,368	There is one in FL and may i suggest you be very careful with your retainer because they will bleed it fucking dry before you even use them.

07-07-2010, 03:17 PM	#8
Way3 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Phoenix, Arizona Posts: 1,725	You may want see if Larry Walters can help you. He is in Florida! http://firstamendment.com/ __________________ FULLY Managed! FREE Control Panel! FREE Month on ALL Shared Accounts!!! ICQ: 169-554-261 Email: info[at]way3{dot}com

07-07-2010, 03:19 PM	#9
CIVMatt Amateur Pimpin Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 13,075	Can I see your tits? __________________ Make easy money with Webcams

07-07-2010, 03:20 PM	#10
Ron Bennett Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,653	Below is a copy and paste of my reply from the thread http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=972124 regarding clothed models. While the OPs situation in that thread is different, my response to it, and that of others, will likely be helpful in regards to your question too. If the pictures are intended to be of a sexual nature (and/or the websites / venues they're shown in), even if no nudity, 2257 would be wise to have. Nudity alone isn't what determines whether a 2257 is required or not, but rather the intended use of the pictures. Nudism books, such as one will find on Amazon, B&N, etc, often have no 2257s on file and depict people of all ages, including minors, in the nude. Digress a bit, but point is that it's how the pictures are posed / intended use that determines whether one needs a 2257 ... based on what you've described, in my view, you need to ensure all models, even those fully clothed, are of legal age and have 2257s for all of them. With all that said, definitely consult with an attorney experienced with the adult business before hiring any models, let alone shooting any content. Ron __________________ Domagon - Website Management and Domain Name Sales

07-08-2010, 04:41 PM	#12
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,405	What about if the tits are on a site that is promoting them for porn?