European Parliament Decides to Block Child Porn at Source

[Paul Markham]

http://www.xbiz.com/news/130688

If it's able to block it at it's source, in the EU, why not just send in the police?

BRUSSELS ? The European Parliament decided yesterday that European Union member states must attempt to block child porn images at the source rather than forcing complete Internet blocking.
Reports said that members of the Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee ruled that blocking access to websites is acceptable only in exceptional circumstances as when a host server from a non-E.U. member country refuses to cooperate or takes too long to comply.

The unanimous 40-0 vote sides with Internet rights activists and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who were concerned about Internet freedom.

"The new generation of MEPs has shown it understands the Internet and has courageously rejected populist but ineffective and cosmetic measures in favor of measures aimed at real child protection," said Joe McNamee, of the European digital rights movement EDRi.

He added, "This is a huge and implausible success for an army of activists campaigning to protect the democratic, societal and economic value of the Internet," he added.

The move supports the idea that simply blocking a website does not guarantee that some offensive images may remain in cyberspace. And blocking could mistakenly remove a site that supports child protection as was the case where a Dutch website reportedly campaigning against child abuse was blocked twice by mistake.

Blocking will be permitted under unusual circumstances but the ruling stated it "Must be set by transparent procedures and provide adequate safeguards, in particular to ensure that the restriction is limited to what is necessary and proportionate, and that users are informed of the reason for the restriction."

In addition, content providers must be informed of their right to appeal.

But some supporters of child protection are concerned. "MEPs seem more concerned with the rights of child pornographers than they do with the rights of children who have been sexually abused," said John Carr of the Children's Charities Coalition on Internet Safety.

The European Commission also suggested that sites hosted outside of the E.U. could be blocked by law enforcement agencies or that it may assist ISPs by developing codes of conduct and guidelines for blocking access on a voluntary basis.

The decision also calls for tougher penalties for those who sexually abuse or exploit children that include a minimum penalty for 22 criminal offenses, including so-called online "grooming" of children, and allowing E.U. member states to impose tougher measures and sentencing.

I think John Carr is spot on.

But then you fall into the problem of Social Network sites, should they be blocked because of underage people putting up nude images?

[Markul]

Well sure, if the social service does not actively police their own service for childporn and does not comply when reported, they need to be blocked/shut down.

[DWB]

John Carr.... as in John Mark Carr?

[Dappz]

its a good move for the union to block child porn

[DamianJ]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

If it's able to block it at it's source,

What does 'block at its source' mean?

[Klen]

Originally Posted by DamianJ

What does 'block at its source' mean?

Host source probably.

[DamianJ]

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Host source probably.

Oh right, so it's Paul Markham thinking that web censorship from government is good again then?

Gotcha.

Here's the right way to reduce child porn access, imho.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...orow-wikipedia

[Fletch XXX]

this article translates to = we have no idea how to stop child porn so we use blanket terms with no real plan of action.

[Dodododa]

Hasn't all the child porn gone to TOR, which is impossible to block?

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

this article translates to = we have no idea how to stop child porn so we use blanket terms with no real plan of action.

does not stop them from making laws.... to politicians understanding an issue is way over rated